|
JBJS welcomes reader comments on published articles. Letters to the Editor are reviewed by JBJS editors but are not peer-reviewed. To submit your letter, please follow the "submit a response" link that appears in the content box at the upper right of the full text of the article.
Letters to the Editor to:
-
- Scientific Articles:
Susan L. Foad, Charles T. Mehlman, and Jun Ying
- The Epidemiology of Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy in the United States
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 1258-1264
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Electronic letters published:
-
Dr. Foad and colleagues respond to Dr. Alfonso
- Susan L Foad, MPH, Charles T. Mehlman, DO, MPH and Jun Ying, PhD
(24 September 2008)
-
Causes and Factors Involved In Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy
- Israel Alfonso, Andrew E. Price, John A. I. Grossman
(26 August 2008)
|
Dr. Foad and colleagues respond to Dr. Alfonso |
24 September 2008 |
|
|
Susan L Foad, MPH, Outcomes Coordinator Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Charles T. Mehlman, DO, MPH and Jun Ying, PhD
Send letter to journal:
Re: Dr. Foad and colleagues respond to Dr. Alfonso
susan.foad{at}cchmc.org Susan L Foad, MPH, et al.
|
We thank Dr. Alfonso for his comments and we are pleased to respond. Following in the footsteps of our colleagues at The Texas Scottish
Rite Hospital (1), we prefer to use the term "neonatal brachial plexus
palsy" to describe such brachial plexus injuries in infants. The term
“obstetrical brachial plexus palsy” is an out dated term that unfairly
implies causation. Just as “Pediatrician hip dysplasia” is a term that
would never be accepted to describe developmental dysplasia of the hip, we
feel that we are at a point in time where we should no longer accept
“obstetrical brachial plexus palsy.” We feel that our paper further
supports this contention because the majority (54%) of infants with
documented brachial plexus injuries had no identifiable risk factors
Cases of neonatal brachial plexus palsy were identified using ICD-9 code(2), age of admission and type of admission from the
Kids’ Inpatient Data Base (KIDS). The ICD-9 code 767.6 was defined as an
injury to the brachial plexus, palsy or paralysis: brachial, Erb
(Duchenne). Tumors, inflammation, or nondelivery–related trauma were not
specified in the KIDS and hence could not be excluded in analyses.
Nevertheless, we believe that they were rare cases and that their potential effects
on our results would be trivial.
Dr. Alfonso, has identified a limitation of utilizing a large
national database. Data analysis is limited to variables that are
collected in the database. Risk factors identified in our study from KIDS
were limited only to variables contained in the infant discharge summary.
Data regarding length of labor, space abnormalities, uterine malformation,
etc would be reported in the mother’s discharge data and this data is not
available from this database.
1. Smith NC, Rowan P, Benson LJ, Ezaki M, Carter PR. Neonatal
Brachial Plexus Palsy. Outcome Of Absent Biceps Function At Three Months
Of Age. JBJS-A. 2004:86-A:2163-70.
2. Hart AC, Hopkins CA ,eds. ICD-9-CM Expert for Physicians Volume
1 & 2. Ingenix; 2005. |
|
Causes and Factors Involved In Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy |
26 August 2008 |
|
|
Israel Alfonso, Pediatric Neurologist Miami Children's Hospital and Florida International University, Andrew E. Price, John A. I. Grossman
Send letter to journal:
Re: Causes and Factors Involved In Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy
ialfonso{at}pediatricneuro.com Israel Alfonso, et al.
|
To the Editor:
We read with interest the article by Foad, et al(1). The authors
appear to use the term neonatal brachial plexus palsy as a synonym for
obstetrical brachial plexus palsy or brachial plexus birth injury. Were
there any nonobstetrical causes of brachial plexus palsy, such as brachial
plexus tumors, inflammation, or nondelivery-related trauma in their
population?
The article states that 54% of children with neonatal brachial
plexus palsy had no known risk factors for this condition, yet the authors
limited the studied variables to factors related to the magnitude of the
stretching force acting upon the brachial plexus at the time of delivery:
shoulder dystocia, instrumented delivery, breech delivery, cesarean
delivery, an exceptionally large baby (an infant weighing >4.5 kg),
heavy for dates (a fetus or infant larger for dates regardless of period
of gestation) and twin or multiple birth-mate babies. This approach
reduces the percentage of patients with known risk factors by ignoring
conditions such as ultrashort second stage of labor, supracostoclavicular
space abnormalities, conditions that limit arm motility during late
gestation, maternal uterine malformations, and familial predisposition.(2-4).
Can these risk factors be retrospectively analyzed in the study
population?
At our program we have taken a wider approach to the search for
possible risk factors based on the following consideration and formula.
The probability (p) of an obstetrical brachial plexus injury (obpi) is
directly proportional to the magnitude of stretching force, which consists
of the sum of the propulsive and traction forces exerted on the brachial
plexus (pf + tf), the acceleration of the stretching force (a), and the
parallelism (cos of ∠) between the vector of the stretching force and the
axis of the most vulnerable brachial plexus segment (@ bp); and inversely
proportional to the resistance (r) of the brachial plexus nerve bundles
(n), shoulder girdle muscles (m) , joints (j) and bones (b).
p of obpi = (pf + tf) a (cos of ∠) @ bp / r (n + m + j + b)
This approach has led to the discovery of risk factors not related to
the magnitude of the stretching force in some of our patients.
The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.
REFERENCES
1.Susan L. Foad, Charles T. Mehlman, and Jun Ying
The Epidemiology of Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy in the United States
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 1258-1264.
2. Sandmire HF, DeMott RK. Erb’s palsy causation: A historical
perspective. Birth. 2002;29 (1):52-54.
3. Becker MH, Lassner F, Bahm J, Ingianni G, Pallua N. The cervical
rib. A predisposing factor for obstetric brachial plexus lesions. J Bone
Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(5):740-743.
4. Alfonso I, Diaz-Arca G, Alfonso DT, Shuhaiber HH, Papazian O,
Price AE, Grossman JA. Fetal deformations: A risk factor for obstetrical
brachial plexus palsy? Pediatr Neurol. 2006;35(4):246-249. |
|