To The Editor:
We read with interest the March 2008 paper by Palmu et al.(1)
entitled “Acute Patellar Dislocation in Children and Adolescents: A
randomized Clinical Trial” and would like to make the following points.
1. The study details 74 cases of acute patella dislocations over a
two-year period. In comparison to the study by Nietosvaara et al.(2), this is a large number for a two year study
from Helsinki, a city that currently has a total population of circa
550,000. Were any of the cases referred to the author's center for tertiary opinion and
management?
2. As cited in the introduction, nonoperative treatment, entailing a
period of rest followed by physiotherapy, is advocated for acute patellar
dislocation(3-5). Despite the methods detailing the demographic and
radiographic characteristics of both patient cohorts examined in this
study, there is no quantification of the number of previous acute patellar
dislocations experienced or the amount of physiotherapy received. More
specifically, since the patella is a mobile structure, the dynamic soft
tissue constraint provided by the extensor mechanism is thought to be
crucial for its stability. A quantification of quadriceps strength would
be informative for both patient cohorts studied.
3. The Insall-Salvati ratio used to assess patella height in this study,
whilst have the theoretical advantages of measuring the patellar tendon
length directly, has poor inter-observer correlation(6). How and by
whom was the measurement of the sulcus angle and the Insall-Salvati ratio
measured? Was adequate inter- and intra- observer agreement achieved?
4. Ligamentous hyperlaxity is a well known predisposing factor to
acute patellar dislocation and patellofemoral instability in children and
adolescents(7). Ligamentous hyperlaxity can be assessed using
Beighton score(8) and comparison of the degree of hypermobility in
this study would be useful.
5. Tibio – femoral alignment is known to alter patellofemoral
mechanics. External tibial torsion(9) and a high Q-angle(10) are
associated with recurrent lateral patella dislocation. Was there any
reason for these not being assessed in the two patient groups studied?
References:
1. Palmu, Kallio PE, Donell ST, Helenius I, Nietosvaara Y. Acute
patellar dislocation in children and adolescents: a randomized clinical
trial. J.Bone Joint Surg.Am 2008;90:463-470.
2. Nietosvaara, Aalto K, Kallio PE. Acute patellar dislocation in
children: incidence and associated osteochondral fractures.
J.Pediatr.Orthop 1994;14:513-515.
3. Beasley, Vidal AF. Traumatic patellar dislocation in children and
adolescents: treatment update and literature review. Curr.Opin.Pediatr.
2004;16:29-36.
4. Buchner, Baudendistel B, Sabo D, Schmitt H. Acute traumatic
primary patellar dislocation: long-term results comparing conservative and
surgical treatment. Clin J.Sport Med. 2005;15:62-66.
5. Cash, Hughston JC. Treatment of acute patellar dislocation. Am
J.Sports Med. 1988;16:244-249.
6. Rogers, Thornton-Bott P, Cannon SR, Briggs TW. Interobserver
variation in the measurement of patellar height after total knee
arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:484-488.
7. Arendt, Fithian DC, Cohen E. Current concepts of lateral patella
dislocation. Clin Sports Med. 2002; 21:499-519.
8. Beighton, de PA, Danks D, Finidori G, Gedde-Dahl T, Goodman R,
Hall JG, Hollister DW, Horton W, McKusick VA, International Nosology of
Heritable Disorders of Connective Tissue, Berlin, 1986. Am J.Med.Genet.
1988; 29:581-594.
9. Cameron, Saha S. External tibial torsion: an underrecognized
cause of recurrent patellar dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;177-184.
10. Mizuno, Kumagai M, Mattessich SM, Elias JJ, Ramrattan N,
Cosgarea AJ, Chao EY. Q-angle influences tibiofemoral and patellofemoral
kinematics. J.Orthop Res. 2001; 19:834-840.