|
JBJS welcomes reader comments on published articles. Letters to the Editor are reviewed by JBJS editors but are not peer-reviewed. To submit your letter, please follow the "submit a response" link that appears in the content box at the upper right of the full text of the article.
Letters to the Editor to:
-
- Scientific Articles:
Robert E. Bunata, David S. Brown, and Roderick Capelo
- Anatomic Factors Related to the Cause of Tennis Elbow
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 1955-1963
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Electronic letters published:
-
Dr. Bunata et al. respond to Dr. LaBan
- Robert E. Bunata, M.D., David S. Brown, M.D., Roderick Capelo, M.D.
(31 October 2007)
-
Anatomic Factors Related to the Cause of Tennis Elbow
- Myron M. LaBan, M.D., MMSc.
(11 October 2007)
|
Dr. Bunata et al. respond to Dr. LaBan |
31 October 2007 |
|
|
Robert E. Bunata, M.D., Orthopedic Surgeon University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, David S. Brown, M.D., Roderick Capelo, M.D.
Send letter to journal:
Re: Dr. Bunata et al. respond to Dr. LaBan
rbunata{at}hsc.unt.edu Robert E. Bunata, M.D., et al.
|
We thank Dr. LaBan for his interest in our article. He raises two
questions requiring a response and one minor modification.
First, he asks “why are some more vulnerable to this injury than
others?” We contend that some people have tendon and bone anatomy that
results in the two structures rubbing against each other in such a way as
to cause injury. Factors that come into play
are the size and shape of the epicondyle and the capitellum, and the
site of the attachment of the extensor complex.
Second, he states that the anatomic variation between bone and tendon
may be the terminal consequence (expanded via email as the “accident
waiting to happen”) in the cause of tennis elbow. If we understand his
question, then we agree that these underlying anatomic relationships only
lay the foundation for the development of tennis elbow. Another
requirement is that the elbow must be moved while the wrist extensors are
under tension. If a person with a predisposing anatomic variation never puts his/her
elbow/wrist extenesors to substantial use then he/she is unlikely to
develop the disorder.
We found no change in the extent or type of rubbing
of tendon on bone due to shoulder position.
In regard to the last sentence in his first paragraph, our
hypothesis is that the tendon is weakened by the transverse rubbing
(trauma) of the tendon on bone. Other authors cited in our paper, not us,
described tendinous microtears from longitudinal overload as the source of
tennis elbows.(1). We propose that once the tendon is weakened, tension
plus abrasion causes further damage as occurs in any tendon exposed to
attritional wear.
Reference:
1. Nirschl RP. Tennis Elbow. Ortho Clinics NA 1973;4:787-800. |
|
Anatomic Factors Related to the Cause of Tennis Elbow |
11 October 2007 |
|
|
Myron M. LaBan, M.D., MMSc. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073
Send letter to journal:
Re: Anatomic Factors Related to the Cause of Tennis Elbow
myjoy{at}comcast.net Myron M. LaBan, M.D., MMSc.
|
To The Editor:
We read with interest the article by Bunata et al.(1)which called attention to the
anatomic relationship of the extensor digitorum brevis and
the capitellum as one of the precipitating causes of lateral
epicondylitis(“tennis elbow”). This syndrome, like that of
carpal tunnel and De Quervains tenosynovitis among others, usually results from
“overuse”. As such, form and function are
inseparable with respect to pathogenesis.
But even when controlling for age,
job description, speed, and repetition of task, why are some more
vulnerable to this injury than others? As a “mechanically induced
condition” anatomic variation between bone and tendon may, in-fact, be a
terminal consequence rather than the “initial step in the cause of tennis
elbow. Remote alterations in proximal as well as distal joint
biomechanics acting repetitively on the elbow through an altered kinetic
chain may instead be the progenitor of the lateral epicondylitis. In this
regard, LaBan, Iyer, and Tamler called attention to the frequent presence
of ipsilateral restricted shoulder range of motion, especially internal
rotation, in patients presenting with symptoms of tennis elbow(2). As a
consequence, excessive wrist flexion is required to compensate for the
proximal restricted arc of shoulder internal rotation. The extensor digitorum longus and brevis are two-joint muscles which cross both the elbow
and the wrist. As such, they have the capacity under load of functionally
reversing their origin insertions from a concentric/shortening to an
eccentric/elongating contraction. As the muscles in mid-cycle
precipitously reverse their direction, aging muscle with its reduced
elastic modulus may not be “fast enough” to absorb the force of recoil.
Instead, the shock of this action is primarily absorbed at the origin of
the extensor expansion. With repeated trauma tendinous microtears as
described by the authors can develop at the lateral epicondyle.
In the late 19th century, Epicondylitis lateralis humeri was
described as a “lesion which is imperfectly recognized, [and] is sure to
find a host of wanted remedies”(3). Over a hundred years later, who would
argue?
The author did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of his research for or preparation of this work. Neither he nor a member of his immediate family received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the author, or a member of his immediate family, is affiliated or associated .
REFERENCES:
1. Bunata RE, Brown DS, Capelo R. Anatomic factors related to the
cause of tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89:1955-63.
2. LaBan, MM, Iyer R, Tamler MS. Occult periarthrosis of the
shoulder. A possible progenitor of tennis elbow. Am J Phys Med Rehabil
2005; 84:1-4.
3. Tennis elbow: Annotations Lancet 1885; 2:772. |
|