|
JBJS welcomes reader comments on published articles. Letters to the Editor are reviewed by JBJS editors but are not peer-reviewed. To submit your letter, please follow the "submit a response" link that appears in the content box at the upper right of the full text of the article.
Letters to the Editor to:
-
- Scientific Articles:
Scott T. Ball, Michel J. Le Duff, and Harlan C. Amstutz
- Early Results of Conversion of a Failed Femoral Component in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 735-741
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Electronic letters published:
-
Revising Femoral-Side Surface Replacement Failures
- Shearwood J. McClelland, MD, MPH, FACS
(2 May 2007)
|
Revising Femoral-Side Surface Replacement Failures |
2 May 2007 |
|
|
Shearwood J. McClelland, MD, MPH, FACS, Director of Orthopaedic Surgery Harlem Hospital Center, 506 Lenox Avenue, New York, NY 10037
Send letter to journal:
Re: Revising Femoral-Side Surface Replacement Failures
sjm2{at}columbia.edu Shearwood J. McClelland, MD, MPH, FACS
|
To The Editor:
While I read with interest the authors’ encouraging results in
revising femoral-side failures of current-generation hip surface
replacement arthroplasties, I was surprised that their well-researched
bibliography, with references dating back into the 1970s, failed to note a
pertinent article on this subject that I and my co-authors published over
twenty years ago.(1) That paper presented two-to-three year follow-up
observations of three femoral-side revisions of first-generation
resurfacing failures using an outer-diameter matched, press-fit bipolar
prosthesis to articulate with the retained acetabular cup. These novel
revisions had “created” the theretofore unreported surgical entity of a
true bipolar total hip arthoplasty, with two distinct, but biomechanically
linked, metal-on-polyethylene articulating interfaces. Fluoroscopic
evaluations of these three hips (and one set of x-rays included in the
article) strongly suggested the preservation and predominance of inner-
bearing motion which, we inferred, might be beneficial in enhancing the
longevity of the retained acetabular components. Unfortunately, these
procedures were performed in a highly mobile military population, and no
follow-up beyond that noted in the article was possible. Moreover,
concerns about the subsequent longevity of the relatively thin, non-metal
backed acetabular shells undoubtedly led many surgeons to opt for revising
such failures to a conventional total hip replacement.
The current generation of hip resurfacing implants, with its use of
metal-on-metal articulations and cementless technology, has significantly
minimized concerns about frictional torque and the wear debris from larger
articulating interfaces as potential causes of premature failure. However,
despite these advances, isolated femoral-side failures of these procedures
do still occur; and as the authors have shown, revision using a head
diameter matched unipolar stem appears to be a technically feasible and
highly satisfactory surgical solution. However, should the currently
unresolved issue of accumulated metal ion release from these implants rise
to a level of concern that leads to the reconsideration of a technology-
enhanced metal-on-plastic resurfacing option, the concept of a bipolar
conversion for those femoral-side failures may be worth a more formalized
revisiting and assessment.
The author did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of his research for or preparation of this work. Neither he nor a member of his immediate family received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the author, or a member of his immediate family, is affiliated or associated .
Reference:
1. McClelland SJ, Godfery JD, Benton PC, and Slemmons, BK. Revision
of Failed Hip Surface Replacement Arthroplasties With A Bipolar
Prosthesis. Three Case Reports with Two-to-Three Year Follow-Up
Observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; 208: 243-248. |
|