|
JBJS welcomes reader comments on published articles. Letters to the Editor are reviewed by JBJS editors but are not peer-reviewed. To submit your letter, please follow the "submit a response" link that appears in the content box at the upper right of the full text of the article.
Letters to the Editor to:
-
- Scientific Articles:
Jeff E. Schulman, Susan Williams, Oner Khera, Tina Sahba, James Michelson, and Kenneth Fine
- Effective Osteoporosis Education in the Outpatient Orthopaedic Setting
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 301-306
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Electronic letters published:
-
Response to "Is the educational change in post menopausal women being ignored"
- Jeff E Schulman, Susan Williams MD
(27 June 2007)
-
Is the educational change in post menopausal women being ignored?
- George Ampat, Cassandra Hallam, Levant Bayam
(26 June 2007)
|
Response to "Is the educational change in post menopausal women being ignored" |
27 June 2007 |
|
|
Jeff E Schulman, Orthopaedic Trauma Fellow R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, Susan Williams MD
Send letter to journal:
Re: Response to "Is the educational change in post menopausal women being ignored"
schulmje{at}yahoo.com Jeff E Schulman, et al.
|
Dear Sir,
We would like to thank Dr. Ampat and his colleagues for their
comments and questions regarding the recent publication of "Effective
Osteoporosis Education in the Outpatient Orthopaedic Setting." In
response to their question, we would reiterate what is stated in the
article. Post menopausal women in the study exhibited a much poorer
response than the pre menopausal group. And the next sentence further
states that this is perhaps because of the relatively small number of
subjects in the post menopausal group (n=26). Our statement was intended
to imply that a type II statistical error is distinctly possible as a flaw
of this study, which could have been stated more explicitly.
Unfortunately, our study was only able to unclude 26 post menopausal
women and this certainly signifies the need for further research into this
sub-group. Indeed, we did demonstrate overall improvements with
education, but they did not achieve statistical significance. Overall, we
sought to educate women in a novel way that has not been tried in the
world of orthopaedics and we feel that this opens the door to a variety of
further interventions as well as research endeavors within the orthopaedic
community.
|
|
Is the educational change in post menopausal women being ignored? |
26 June 2007 |
|
|
George Ampat, Orthopaedic Surgeon Southport Hospitals NHS Trust, Cassandra Hallam, Levant Bayam
Send letter to journal:
Re: Is the educational change in post menopausal women being ignored?
geampat{at}aol.com George Ampat, et al.
|
Dear Sir
We read with great interest the article entitled "Effective
Osteoporosis Education in the Outpatient Orthopaedic Setting (2007 89-A •
2 • February 301-306) by Schulman, Williams, Khera, Sahba, Michelson and
Fine".1
We commend the authors for doing an excellent study regarding a prime
opportunity for education regarding osteoporosis prevention and lifestyle
modification that can be performed in an inexpensive fashion.
The current report states “In contrast, the postmenopausal group
exhibited a much poorer response to the educational intervention (Table
IV).”
This requires clarification. In the pre menopausal group the percent
change between "before education" and "after education" is 20 % (69% to
89%) (Table III) and the authours have stated that it is statistically
significant at P = <0.001. In the post menopausal group the percentage
change is greater at 42 % ( 27% to 69%) (Table IV). The authours however
state that statistical significance has not been reached as p = 0.006.
Could this have occured because of the relatively few numbers in the post
menopausal group. Is it possible that a Type II statistical error has
occurred2?
1. Schulman JE, Williams S, Khera O, Sahba T, Michelson J, Fine K.
Effective Osteoporosis Education in the Outpatient Orthopaedic Setting.
JBJS-A Vol 89-A • No 2 • Feb 2007 301-306
2. Szabo RM. Current Concepts Review Principles of Epidemiology for
the Orthopaedic Surgeon. JBJS-A, Vol. 80-A, No. 1, Jan 1998 111-119
The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated. |
|