To The Editor:
I read with interest the article on exchange nailing of
ununited fractures(1). Although the authors performed a comprehensive review, I would like to point out that there is an important operative technique that they did not discuss.
The use of a circular fixator to compress a long bone nonunion with
an intramedullary nail in situ has previously been described by the same
authors(2) and requires the exchange of an intramedullary nail with one of smaller diameter in addition to the application of an Ilizarov
fixator to allow slow compression at the nonunion site. This technique relies on
different mechanical and biological effects than exchange nailing per se
with a smaller nail being placed unreamed and providing stability by resisting only bending and shearing forces. Indeed, this technique has also been
utilised with retention of a failed exchange nail(3) and provided
excellent results in these recalcitrant nonunion cases.
The author did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of his research for or preparation of this work. Neither he nor a member of his immediate family received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the author, or a member of his immediate family, is affiliated or associated .
References:
1. Brinker MR, O’Connor DP. Exchange Nailing of Ununited Fractures. J
Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89:177-188
2. Brinker MR, O’Connor DP. Ilizarov Compression Over a Nail for
Aseptic Femoral Nonunions That Have Failed Exchange Nailing: A Report of
Five Cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2003; 17:668-676
3. Menon DK, Dougall TW, Pool RD, Simonis RB. Augmentative Ilizarov
External Fixation After Failure Of Diaphyseal Union With Intramedullary
Nailing. J Orthop Trauma. 2002; 16:491-497