JBJS welcomes reader comments on published articles. Letters to the Editor are reviewed by JBJS editors but are not peer-reviewed. To submit your letter, please follow the "submit a response" link that appears in the content box at the upper right of the full text of the article.

Letters to the Editor to:

Articles:
Michelle S. Caird, John M. Flynn, Y. Leo Leung, Jennifer E. Millman, Joann G. D'Italia, and John P. Dormans
Factors Distinguishing Septic Arthritis from Transient Synovitis of the Hip in Children. A Prospective Study
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1251-1257 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*Letters to the Editor: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read Letter to the Editor] Septic Arthrits Versus Transient Synovitis of the Hip In Children
Gunasekaran Kumar, Ravi Trehan   (24 July 2006)

Septic Arthrits Versus Transient Synovitis of the Hip In Children 24 July 2006
  Top
Gunasekaran Kumar,
Specialist Registrar, Orthopaedics
Arrowe Park Hospital, UK,
Ravi Trehan

Send letter to journal:
Re: Septic Arthrits Versus Transient Synovitis of the Hip In Children

gunasekarankumar{at}hotmail.com Gunasekaran Kumar, et al.

To The Editor:

We congratulate the authors on performing a prospective study (1) on such an important topic. However, we found the title of the article a bit misleading as the authors obtained data only on patients with a high degree of clinical suspicion of septic arthritis. There are no data on the inflammatory markers in children who were diagnosed with transient synovitis of the hip in the first instance. Without this information it would be very difficult to come to a conclusion on the biochemical differences between septic arthritis and transient synovitis of the hip. The subject population chosen by the authors is a very biased one. Further, the authors mention that ultrasound evaluation and aspiration were performed on those children who were most likely to have septic arthritis of the hip. They do not provide the clinical criteria that were used to arrive at this probable diagnosis.

The results in this group of children show that only 17/48 patients had culture proven septic arthritis. Of the 17 patients with presumed septic arthritis, the authors do not report whether these patients underwent arthrotomy of the hip or the results of the cultures of the aspirate at arthrotomy. This high proportion of patients (17/48) who were negative for culture of hip means that either the aspiration was incorrectly performed or there were overinclusive criteria in selection of patients.

The only way to definitely identify the factors that distinguish septic arthritis from transient synovitis of the hip is to perform ultrasound examination, hip aspiration, blood cultures and inflammatory markers in all children who present with a limp or hip pain with no other identifiable causes. The chances of this kind of a study gaining ethical committee approval is very low, indeed.

In our experience, transient synovitis of the hip usually occurs about 2 to 3 weeks after an episode of upper respiratory infection. Hence, the inflammatory markers in these patients are usually raised to varying degrees. We are in the process of writing a paper which focuses on the inflammatory markers in the transient synovitis of the hip which would shed more light on apparent differences between these two conditions.

The author(s) of this letter to the editor did not receive payment or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the author(s) are affiliated or associated.

Reference:

1. Michelle S. Caird, John M. Flynn, Y. Leo Leung, Jennifer E. Millman, Joann G. D'Italia, and John P. Dormans. Factors Distinguishing Septic Arthritis from Transient Synovitis of the Hip in Children. A Prospective Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1251-1257.