JBJS welcomes reader comments on published articles. Letters to the Editor are reviewed by JBJS editors but are not peer-reviewed. To submit your letter, please follow the "submit a response" link that appears in the content box at the upper right of the full text of the article.

Letters to the Editor to:

Scientific Articles:
Anita Söderqvist, Ricard Miedel, Sari Ponzer, and Jan Tidermark
The Influence of Cognitive Function on Outcome After a Hip Fracture
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 2115-2123 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*Letters to the Editor: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read Letter to the Editor] Cognitive function and mortality after hip fracture
Dominik Golicki, M.D., MSc, Grzegorz Fijewski, Andrzej Sliwka   (8 November 2006)

Cognitive function and mortality after hip fracture 8 November 2006
  Top
Dominik Golicki, M.D., MSc
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland,
Grzegorz Fijewski, Andrzej Sliwka

Send letter to journal:
Re: Cognitive function and mortality after hip fracture

dgolicki{at}amwaw.edu.pl Dominik Golicki, M.D., MSc, et al.

To The Editor:

In their recent paper on the influence of cognitive function on outcome after hip fracture, Soderqvist et al.(1)stated that cognitive impairment, especially severe (Short Portable Mental State Questionnaire score <3), is a strong predictor of poor outcome.

In our own prospective observational study (PolHipQoL study) evaluating 153 patients for a mean duratlion of 14 months, any kind of cognitive dysfunction, i.e. mild, moderate or severe ( <8 points), was associated with increased mortality (49.2 vs 14.1%)(2). Instead of the Short Portable Mental State Questionnaire, we used the Abbreviated Mental State Questionnaire (AMTS), an instrument recommended for use in the Standardised Audit of Hip Fracture in Europe (SAHFE)(3). Both questionnaires are validated, and consist of 10-items that are similar in terms of content, administration, and scoring(4).

Our study confirmed that cognitive impairment is the strongest prognostic factor of increased mortality (HR = 3.49; 95%CI: 1.92 – 6.36), better than age over 82 years old (HR = 2.13; 95%CI: 1.32 – 3.42), physical status III or IV in American Society of Anaesthesiologists ASA scale (HR = 1.95; 95%CI: 1.10 – 3.43) or anaemia (HR = 1.68; 95%CI: 1.07 – 2.62).

We fully agree with the authors' conclusions that identification of cognitive dysfunction using a validated instrument, at the time of admission to the orthopaedic ward, should be considered a mandatory assessment for patients with hip fracture.

The author(s) of this letter to the editor did not receive payment or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the author(s) are affiliated or associated.

References:

1. Soderqvist A, Miedel R, Pozer S, Tidermark J. The influence of cognitive function on outcome after a hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2115-23.

2. Golicki D, Sliwka A, Fijewski G, Latek M. Quality of life according to EQ-5D after osteoporotic hip fracture in Poland. Value Health. 2006;9(6):A382.

3. Standardised Audit of Hip Fracture in Europe (SAHFE). http://www.sahfe.ort.lu.se/

4. Hodkinson HM. Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly. Age Ageing 1981;1:233-8.