|
JBJS welcomes reader comments on published articles. Letters to the Editor are reviewed by JBJS editors but are not peer-reviewed. To submit your letter, please follow the "submit a response" link that appears in the content box at the upper right of the full text of the article.
Letters to the Editor to:
-
- Scientific Articles:
James S. Davitt, Nancy Kadel, Bruce J. Sangeorzan, Sigvard T. Hansen, Jr., Sarah K. Holt, and Emily Donaldson-Fletcher
- An Association Between Functional Second Metatarsal Length and Midfoot Arthrosis
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 795-800
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Electronic letters published:
-
Editor's Note
- Robert Poss MD
(7 July 2005)
-
A Question About the Exclusion Criteria For this Study
- George F. Wallace
(7 July 2005)
|
Editor's Note |
7 July 2005 |
|
|
Robert Poss MD, Deputy Editor Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Send letter to journal:
Re: Editor's Note
possr{at}jbjs.org Robert Poss MD
|
The corresponding author has been invited to respond to the letter by
Dr. Wallace and to date, has not done so.
|
|
A Question About the Exclusion Criteria For this Study |
7 July 2005 |
|
|
George F. Wallace, Podiatry University Hospital-UMDNJ, Newark, NJ 07103
Send letter to journal:
Re: A Question About the Exclusion Criteria For this Study
wallacgf{at}umdnj.edu George F. Wallace
|
To the Editor:
In the article "An Association Between Functional Second Metatarsal Length and Midfoot Arthrosis", the authors state that no
trauma patients were included in their series. However, upon inspection of their Figure 2, there appears to be a step off (malalignment) at the medial
borders of the second and intermediate cuneiform respectively. This would
signify a Lisfranc fracture dislocation, albeit subtly. The arthrosis then
would be from a traumatic event and hence should not have been included in
the study population.
One can argue that the step off is an anatomical "variant" but information about the other foot is lacking. Likewise, no other
views of the same foot or CT scans are mentioned or depicted which could
be used to definitively make the diagnosis of a Lisfranc injury and the
sequela of arthrosis of the second metatarsal intermediate cuneiform
articulation.
At the least, the choice of inserting Figure 2 could be confusing to the
reader and does not appear to match their exclusion criteria. I look
forward to the authors' comments.
Sincerely,
George F. Wallace, DPM, MBA
Director, Podiatry Service
University Hospital-University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
150 Bergen Street, A-226
Newark, NJ 07103 |
|