JBJS welcomes reader comments on published articles. Letters to the Editor are reviewed by JBJS editors but are not peer-reviewed. To submit your letter, please follow the "submit a response" link that appears in the content box at the upper right of the full text of the article.

Letters to the Editor to:

Scientific Articles:
Jong-Beom Park, Yong-Sun Cho, and K. Daniel Riew
Development of Adjacent-Level Ossification in Patients with an Anterior Cervical Plate
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 558-563 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*Letters to the Editor: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read Letter to the Editor] Indications for Anterior Cervical Plating and Fusion
Rajkumar S. Amaravati, india-560034   (21 March 2005)

Indications for Anterior Cervical Plating and Fusion 21 March 2005
  Top
Rajkumar S. Amaravati,
doctor
assistant professor,department of orthopaedics,st.john's medical college and hospital,bangalore-,
india-560034

Send letter to journal:
Re: Indications for Anterior Cervical Plating and Fusion

rajkumar_as{at}yahoo.co.in Rajkumar S. Amaravati, et al.

To the Editor:

I commend the authors on their efforts to classify and propose a probable cause of adjacent level ossificationfollowing arthrodesis with an anterior cervical plate. The prevalence of ossification in their series was rather high-- about 59% of 118 cephalad and 29% of 100 caudal adjacent disc spaces. It would have been helpful if they had assesed the clinical outcomes as well. I have a few questions for the authors.

Degenerative changes occur as part of the natural history of cervical spondylosis. After arhtrodesis, the unfused adjacent segments have more stress. It is also seen that new symptoms that develop after fusion in the adjacent disc levels resolve after Anterior cervical plating and fusion (1). As the disease can progress either way, what is the rationale for performing surgery?

There is a chance of developing adjacent level ossification after open surgery or after microscopic surgery. Are they an indication of imminent disc lesion?

It has been found in the literature that at 2-years follow up non- operative treatment gave good to excellent results for symptoms of cervical radiculopathy (2).Also a conflicting report found no difference in the rate of new radiculopathy that develops at adjacent level in patients who had Anterior cervical discectomy or Anterior cervical plating[ACP] with fusion (3).So we are at cross roads as what to tell our patients and how much to tell.Whether to go for conservative treatment or operative.

Finally, I would like to know whether the authors feel there a need to remove the posterior longitudinal ligament in all cases while doing ACP with fusion.If yes,then what are the do's and and dont's and how much does this influence the adjacent level ossification?

REFERENCES:

1.Hillbrand AS,Carlson GD,Palumbo MA,Jones PK, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis.J. Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:519- 528.

2.Saal JS, Saal JA,Yurth EF.Nonoperative management of herniated cervicalintervertebral disc with radiculopathy. Spine 1996;21:1877-1883.

3.Lunsford LD,Bissonette D,Janetta PJ,Sheptaak PE,Zorub DS.Anterior surgery for Cervical disc disease Part 1:Treatment of lateral cervical disc herniation in 253 cases.J Neurosurg 1980;53 :1-11.