EDITOR'S NOTE: The corresponding author has been invited to respond to this letter and to date, has not done so.
To the Editor:
We read with great interest the article by Bosse, et al,(1) and applaud their effort to establish that the insensate foot is not an indication for amputation in severe lower
extremity injuries. We would like to add some additional comments and questions to the topic.
Why did the authors use the criteria of MESS(2) where the cold, paralysed, insensate and numb limb
represents the highest degree of limb ischemia as opposed to the criteria for an insensate limb used in the
NISSA rating system(3) which represents nerve injury?
It would be interesting to know the cause (nerve injury, vascular
injury or both) of insensate foot in the salvage group who recovered
sensation. How did the authors arrive at the conclusion that ‘sensory
impairment at twenty four months appeared to be independent of treatment
with either amputation or limb salvage’ when the table 1 represents the
results of sensory loss in the amputated group as N/A?
We wonder how the decision was made to proceed with amputation in the insensate
amputation group. Surely, the patient’s personal and social beliefs must be
considered in the decision making for amputation along with the scoring
systems(4).
References:
1. Bosse MJ, McCarthy ML, Jones AL, Webb LX, Sims SH, Sanders RW. The
Insensate Foot Following Severe Lower Extremity Trauma: An indication for
amputation? J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005: 87(12); 2601-8.
2. McNamara MG, Heckman JD, Corley FG. Severe open fractures of the lower
extremity: A evaluation of the mangled extremity severity score (MESS). J
Orthop
Trauma 1994: 8(2); 81-87.
3. Johansen K, Daines M, Howey T, Helfet D, Hansen ST. Objective criteria
accurately predict amputation following lower extremity trauma. J Trauma
1990: 30(5); 568-72.
4. John V Z, Alagappan M, Devadoss S, Devadoss A. A completely shattered
tibia. J Bone Joint Surg 2005: 87 (11); 1556-59.