To the Editor:
I read with interest the report of Dobbs and his colleagues regarding
the use of an intramedullary rod for the treatment of congenital
pseudarthrosis of the tibia. In their discussion they state that the intramedullary rod should
extend into the hindfoot to stabilise the subtalar and ankle
joint.
In their list of references,
they have not cited the article written by my group at the Sheffield
Children’s Hospital in which we reported satisfactory results by using the Sheffield
Intramedullary Nail System for this condition. This rod does not cross the
ankle or subtalar joints. It is our view that it is not essential for the rod to
cross both the ankle and subtalar joints (1).
I would be grateful for the comments of Mr Dobbs and his colleagues
and wonder why his literature review did not extend to papers
published in your sister journal.
1. Fern D Bell MJ. Expanding Rods in Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the
Tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br Nov 1990.