JBJS welcomes reader comments on published articles. Letters to the Editor are reviewed by JBJS editors but are not peer-reviewed. To submit your letter, please follow the "submit a response" link that appears in the content box at the upper right of the full text of the article.

Letters to the Editor to:

Scientific Articles:
Ofer Levy, Lennard Funk, Giuseppe Sforza, and Stephen A. Copeland
Copeland Surface Replacement Arthroplasty of the Shoulder in Rheumatoid Arthritis
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 512-518 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*Letters to the Editor: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read Letter to the Editor] Copeland Surface Replacement Arthroplasty
James W. Pritchett   (7 April 2004)

Copeland Surface Replacement Arthroplasty 7 April 2004
  Top
James W. Pritchett

Send letter to journal:
Re: Copeland Surface Replacement Arthroplasty

JimP{at}PacMed.org James W. Pritchett

To The Editor:

I read with great interest the article entitled “Copeland Surface Replacement Arthroplasty of the Shoulder in Rheumatoid Arthritis”(2004; 86:512-518) by Levy et al. The long- term results of the Total Articular Replacement Arthroplasty (TARA) corroborate the authors’ findings. The TARA prosthesis with its characteristic curved stem was developed and commonly used as a femoral head surfacing prosthesis starting in 1952.1,2 The humeral prosthesis had a shorter stem and was first used in 1957 by the innovator Charles O. Townley of Port Huron, MI.

Since neither polyethylene nor polymethylmethacrylate was readily available the prosthesis was used as a press fit hemiarthroplasty. Starting in 1960 polyurethane was occasionally used to resurface the glenoid and if the humeral fixation was in doubt polyurethane was used as cement. More than 100 humeral TARA prostheses were implanted with a follow-up interval as long as 33 years.

When a hemiarthroplasty was performed the glenoid was prepared, just as the authors report for the Copeland prosthesis, by drilling to encourage fibrous tissue in growth. The implant, therefore, functions as an articular barrier assisting the formation of a self lubricating, soft, mobile, pseudobiological fibrous joint. In the cases where polyurethane was used it fragmented and ultimately disappeared radiographically. The joint then functioned as a hemiarthroplasty. There was neither apparent adverse reaction to polyurethane debris in patients nor were adverse changes found at necropsy in dogs.

Many of the patients also had hip arthritis and received a TARA hip prosthesis. The size of the humeral and femoral surfacing prosthesis was the same. A ceramic resurfacing prosthesis became available in 1995. Like resurfacing operations for the hip, the technique of resurfacing arthroplasty of the shoulder is demanding and critical to the long-term success of the procedure.

James W. Pritchett, MD 1101 Madison #400 Seattle, WA 98104

JimP@PacMed.org 206 505 1043

1. Freeman M: Total surface hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 134:2-4, 1978.

2. Townley CO: Hemi and total articular replacement arthroplasty of the hip with a

fixed femoral cup. Orthop Clin North Amer 13:869-894, 1982.