|
JBJS welcomes reader comments on published articles. Letters to the Editor are reviewed by JBJS editors but are not peer-reviewed. To submit your letter, please follow the "submit a response" link that appears in the content box at the upper right of the full text of the article.
Letters to the Editor to:
-
- Scientific Articles:
Roman Radl, Norbert Kastner, Christian Aigner, Horst Portugaller, Herbert Schreyer, and Reinhard Windhager
- Venous Thrombosis After Hallux Valgus Surgery
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 1204-1208
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Electronic letters published:
-
Dr. Radl replies to Drs. Simon and Mass
- Roman Radl, Reinhard Windhager
(30 September 2003)
-
Patients Undergoing Elective Forefoot Surgery Should Not Receive Prophylactic Anticoagulation
- Michael A. Simon, Daniel P. Mass, M.D.
(18 September 2003)
-
Re: Prevalance of venous thrombosis after hallux valgus surgery - is it low?
- Roman Radl, Reinhard Windhager.
(20 August 2003)
-
Prevalance of venous thrombosis after hallux valgus surgery - is it low?
- Ramesh Thalava
(6 August 2003)
|
Dr. Radl replies to Drs. Simon and Mass |
30 September 2003 |
|
|
Roman Radl , Reinhard Windhager
Send letter to journal:
Re: Dr. Radl replies to Drs. Simon and Mass
roman.radl{at}uni-graz.at Roman Radl, et al.
|
We thank Dr. Simon for his interesting comments regarding our article
dealing with venous thrombosis following bunion surgery. In the diagnosis
of deep vein thrombosis there are three methods that have been shown to be
accurate in the investigation of symptomatic patients:
venography; ultrasonography; and impedance plethysmography (3).
However, in the detection of asymptomatic thrombosis in the calf veins the
Doppler ultrasound, phleborheography and other non invasive techniques
were found to be unreliable as routine surveillance tools(1,2).
Ascending
venography remains the most reliable screening modality and therefore is
said to be the gold standard in the detection of venous thrombosis, but
it is invasive(1). Hence, from our findings, we suggest that thrombosis
screening using venograhy instead of ultrasound and phleborheography as in
the study by Simon et al. might have led to a higher prevalence of
detected postoperative thrombosis (5).
Preoperative contrast studies were not performed in our series. We wanted to avoid a possible postphlebographic venous
thrombosis and minimize the risk of other
phlebographic related complications by performing only one invasive
investigation, as the risk of DVT following minor surgery is known to be
very low. Venography was performed at four weeks postoperatively to include detection of late deep vein thrombosis. Also, preoperative screening for
non symptomatic DVT would possibly have resulted in the selection of a
cohort that was not representative.
In large series, 17 to 23 per cent of distal thrombi
propagated to the thigh, and approximately 50 per cent of those resulted
in pulmonary embolism. Multiple studies involving 100 to 200 patients each
have shown that 40 to 60 per cent of all thrombi after total hip
replacement, and as many as 95 per cent of those after total knee
arthroplasty, involve the deep veins of the calf(1). The majority of
symptomatic episodes of DVT start in the calf veins, but symptoms are
uncommon until there is involvement of the proximal veins. (4).
Although it has been
stated that about half of calf thromboses resolve spontaneously within
72 hours, about one sixth extend to the proximal veins and thus increase the
risk of pulmonary embolism(4).
Therefore, we do not agree with Dr. Simon's assumption that
calf vein thrombosis is unlikely to lead to a pulmonary embolus.
Finally, the main message of our study was that there is a possible risk
of deep vein thrombosis following bunion surgery. We feel that patients
with obvious risk factors for DVT should receive medical DVT
prophylaxis.
1. Ciccone WJ, 2nd, Fox PS, Neumyer M, Rubens D, Parrish WM,
Pellegrini VD, Jr. Ultrasound surveillance for asymptomatic deep venous
thrombosis after total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 80(8):
1167-74., 1998.
2. Comerota AJ, Katz ML, Grossi RJ, White JV, Czeredarczuk M, Bowman G,
DeSai S, Vujic I. The comparative value of noninvasive testing for
diagnosis and surveillance of deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg, 7(1): 40-
9, 1988.
3. Hirsh J, Hoak J. Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary
embolism. A statement for healthcare professionals. Council on Thrombosis
(in consultation with the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology), American
Heart Association. Circulation, 93(12): 2212-45., 1996.
4. Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation,
107(23 Suppl 1): I22-30, 2003.
5. Simon MA, Mass DP, Zarins CK, Bidani N, Gudas CJ, Metz CE. The effect
of a thigh tourniquet on the incidence of deep venous thrombosis after
operations on the fore part of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 64(2): 188-
91, 1982. |
|
Patients Undergoing Elective Forefoot Surgery Should Not Receive Prophylactic Anticoagulation |
18 September 2003 |
|
|
Michael A. Simon, Chief, Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine The University of Chicago, Daniel P. Mass, M.D.
Send letter to journal:
Re: Patients Undergoing Elective Forefoot Surgery Should Not Receive Prophylactic Anticoagulation
msimon{at}surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu Michael A. Simon, et al.
|
To The Editor:
Early in our academic career we had the fortunate experience of being
authors of one of the earliest prospective clinical randomized studies
in orthopaedic surgery. The study was designed to determine whether the
use of a thigh tourniquet influences the incidence of deep venous
thrombosis(1). The results in a cohort of 117 patients who underwent
elective forefoot surgery showed that no patient had a venous thrombosis.
A recent study entitled Venous Thrombosis after Hallux Valgus Surgery also
showed a very low rate of venous thrombosis; only 4/100 (4%) had calf vein
thrombosis(2) This recent paper did not reference our article.
Although the study design, method of detection of the thrombosis, and
purpose of the two studies were different, the inclusion and exclusion
criteria, study population, number of patients, type of surgical
procedure, use of a thigh tourniquet, and outcomes were similar: However,
in spite of their data and ours, Radl, et. al.
conclude, “ because patients who have undergone hallux valgus surgery are
at a certain risk for venous thrombosis and patients over sixty years of
age especially may benefit from medical prophylaxis against thrombosis.”(2)
No preoperative or baseline contrast studies were performed in the study by Radl, et.al.
The four patients who had positive studies were
significantly older (p=0.034); a close call considering just four patients who
had a positive study. All of the positive contrast studies were only
abnormal in the calf, which is unlikely to lead to a pulmonary embolus.
Therefore, we strongly disagree with their suggestion that
prophylactic anticoagulation is indicated for routine elective hallux
valgus surgery, or any forefoot surgery.
Michael A. Simon, M.D.
Daniel P. Mass, M.D.
The University of Chicago
5841 S. Maryland Ave.-MC 3079
Chicago, IL 60637
References:
1. Simon, MA, Mass DP, Zarins CK, Bidani, N, Gudas CJ, and Metz CE:
The Effect of a Thigh
Tourniquet on the Incidence of Deep Venous Thrombosis after Forefoot
Surgery. J. BONE AND
JOINT SURG., 64A:188-191, 1982.
2. Radi R, Kastner N, Aigner C, Horst P, Schreyer H, Windhager R:
Venous Thrombosis After Hallux
Valgus Surgery. J. BONE AND JOINT SURG., 85A:1204-1209, 2003. |
|
Re: Prevalance of venous thrombosis after hallux valgus surgery - is it low? |
20 August 2003 |
|
|
Roman Radl, Orthopaedic Surgeon , Reinhard Windhager.
Send letter to journal:
Re: Re: Prevalance of venous thrombosis after hallux valgus surgery - is it low?
roman.radl{at}uni-graz.at Roman Radl, et al.
|
R. Radl, and R. Windhager reply:
We would like to thank Mr. R. Thalava for his commentary on our
article.
The intention of our study was to evaluate the potential risk of venous
thrombosis following hallux valgus surgery.
The venography, which up to know is regarded as the gold standard in the
investigation of deep vein thrombosis, was performed only once to avoid a
possible post-venographic thrombosis as stated in the literature after
performing two or more investigations.1 In our study a venography was
performed four weeks after the operative procedure with the intention to
discover also late deep vein thrombosis, which is known from a number of
publications.2,3,4
We agree with Mr. Thalava that the risk of postoperative thrombosis might
be highest within the first postoperative week. An additional non invasive
investigation like ultrasound performed one week after the surgical
procedure would have probably detected more cases of thrombosis, however,
this method is known to be unreliable as routine surveillance to detect
asymptomatic venous thrombi in the calf.5
In the present study no symptoms indicating a venous thrombosis could be
detected during the first postoperative week. Additionally, we want to
emphasize that venous thrombi which degenerate in this short time period
and therefore cannot be detected four weeks after the operation might not
be of serious clinical relevance.
Since the routine use of low-molecular weight-heparin as antithrombotic
prophylaxis in hallux valgus surgery is very common in our country, the
local ethics committee insisted on rigorous exclusion criteria. According
to the findings of our study, patients following operative hallux valgus
correction are at a certain risk of venous thrombosis. Therefore we feel
that patients with obvious risk factors for venous thrombosis are at need
of a medical thrombosis prophylaxis. The inclusion of patients with risk
factors might have increased the number of cases with venous thrombosis.
Advanced age is a well known clinical risk factor for developing
first time venous thrombosis.6 The prevalence of thrombosis following
total hip replacement or major trauma rises significantly with increasing
age.7,8
However, in a population-based cohort study the total daily activity was
systematically decreasing with the age.10 From these findings it is easy
to speculate that the activity level might be reason for the significant
age difference in the patients with and without postoperative vein
thrombosis. Unfortunately, in our patients the exact postoperative
activity level was not measured and therefore this issue can be only a
speculation, but should be concern in further prospective studies.
Reference List
1. Radl, Kastner N, Aigner C, Portugaller H, Schreyer H,
Windhager R. Venous thrombosis after hallux valgus surgery. J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 2003;85:1204-8.
1. Fraser JD, Anderson DR. Deep venous thrombosis: recent
advances and optimal investigation with US. Radiology. 1999;211:9-24.
2. Bergqvist D, Benoni G, Bjorgell O, Fredin H, Hedlundh
U, Nicolas
S, Nilsson P, Nylander G. Low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) as
prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement. N
Engl J Med. 1996;335:696-700.
3. Lassen MR, Borris LC, Anderson BS, et al. Efficacy and
safety of prolonged thromboprophylaxis with a low molecular weight heparin
(dalteparin) after total hip arthroplasty--the Danish Prolonged
Prophylaxis (DaPP) Study. Thromb Res. 1998;89:281-7.
4. Trowbridge A, Boese CK, Woodruff B, Brindley HH, Sr.,
Lowry WE, Spiro TE. Incidence of posthospitalization proximal deep venous
thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty. A pilot study. Clin Orthop.
1994;299:203-8.
5. Ciccone WJ 2nd, Fox PS, Neumyer M, Rubens D, Parrish
WM, Pellegrini VD Jr. Ultrasound surveillance for asymptomatic deep venous
thrombosis after total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am.
1998;80:1167-74.
6. White R. The Epidemiology of Venous Thromboembolism
Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23 Suppl 1):I4-8.
7. Sikorski, Hampson WG, Staddon GE. The natural history
and
aetiology of deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. J Bone
Joint Surg Br. 1981;63:171-7.
8. Stannard JP, Riley RS, McClenney MD, Lopez-Ben RR,
Volgas DA, Alonso JE.Mechanical prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis
after pelvic and acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001
Jul;83:1047-51.
9. Norman A, Bellocco R, Vaida F, Wolk A. Total physical
activity in relation to age, body mass, health and other factors in a
cohort of Swedish men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 May;26(5):670-
5. |
|
Prevalance of venous thrombosis after hallux valgus surgery - is it low? |
6 August 2003 |
|
|
Ramesh Thalava, Locum Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
Send letter to journal:
Re: Prevalance of venous thrombosis after hallux valgus surgery - is it low?
rameshgenie{at}yahoo.com Ramesh Thalava
|
Dear Editor,
I read the article on venous thrombosis after hallux valgus surgery
(Radl et al., 2003) with interest. The authors have conducted a well
planned study. It is reassuring to note the low prevalance rate of venous
thrombosis at four weeks after hallux valgus surgery.
I feel that a single investigation performed four weeks after the
surgery may not have accurately quantified the true incidence of venous
thrombosis. The authors in their discussion have clearly stated that most
of the thrombi form in the first post operative week and supported it with
a reference (Sikorski et al., 1981). Perhaps a non invasive investigation
in the first week after surgery might have diagnosed more cases of venous
thrombi.
The study suggests a significant association between venous
thrombosis and the age of the patient. Noting the inclusion and exclusion
criteria, a relatively risk free population has been selected for the
study. Can the authors explain the reason for the significant age
dependent increase in the venous thrombosis that was noted in their study.
Reference List
1. Radl, Kastner N, Aigner C, Portugaller H, Schreyer H, Windhager
R. Venous thrombosis after hallux valgus surgery. J.Bone Joint Surg.Am.
2003; 85-A:1204-1208
2. Sikorski, Hampson WG, Staddon GE. The natural history and
aetiology of deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. J.Bone
Joint Surg.Br. 1981; 63-B:171-177
|
|