|
JBJS welcomes reader comments on published articles. Letters to the Editor are reviewed by JBJS editors but are not peer-reviewed. To submit your letter, please follow the "submit a response" link that appears in the content box at the upper right of the full text of the article.
Letters to the Editor to:
-
- Scientific Articles:
Ching-Jen Wang, Jun-Wen Wang, Lin-Hsiu Weng, Chia-Chen Hsu, Chung-Cheng Huang, and Han-Shiang Chen
- The Effect of Alendronate on Bone Mineral Density in the Distal Part of the Femur and Proximal Part of the Tibia After Total Knee Arthroplasty
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 2121-2126
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Electronic letters published:
-
Dr Wang responds to Dr Alexandropoulos
- Chin-Jen Wang, M.D., Jun-Wen Wang, Lin-Hsiu Weng, Chia-Chen Hsu, Chung-Cheng Huang, and Han-Shiang Chen.
(26 April 2004)
-
The Effect of Alendronate on Bone Mineral Density
- Christos Alexandropoulos
(26 April 2004)
-
Dr. Wang responds:
- Ching-Jen Wang, M.D., Jun-Wen Wang, M.D., Lin-Hsiu Weng, M.D., Chia-Chen Hsu, M.D., Chung-Cheng Huang, M.D.
(21 April 2004)
-
Dr Wang responds:
- Ching-Jen Wang, Jun-Wein Wang, L H Wend, CC Hsu, CC Huang and HS Chen
(10 February 2004)
-
The Effect of Alendronate on Bone Mineral Density in the Distal Part of the Femur and Proximal Part
- Tarja A Soininvaara, Kuopio University Hospital
(10 February 2004)
|
Dr Wang responds to Dr Alexandropoulos |
26 April 2004 |
|
|
Chin-Jen Wang, M.D., Orthopedic Surgeon Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Dept., Orthopedic Surgery, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 833, Jun-Wen Wang, Lin-Hsiu Weng, Chia-Chen Hsu, Chung-Cheng Huang, and Han-Shiang Chen.
Send letter to journal:
Re: Dr Wang responds to Dr Alexandropoulos
w281211{at}adm.cgmh.org.tw Chin-Jen Wang, M.D., et al.
|
We like to respond to the questions raised by Christos
Alexandropoulos in reference to our recent article entitled "The effect of
alendronate on bone mineral density ... after total knee arthroplasty"
(2003;85:2121-6 Am). We did measure the BMD on the contralateral knee in
this study. The BMD of the distal femur showed an increase of 11.6% +/-
22.2% in the alendronate group versus a decrease5.2% +/- 16.6% in the
control group at 6 months.
The BMD of the proximal tibia showed an increase of 6.3% +/- 26.5% in the
alendronate group versus a decrease of 2.3% +/- 10/1% in the control
group at 6 months. The data at one year postoperative were much lower.
We also analysed the BMD data on the contralateral knees into two
groups; one group with prior TKA and the other had no surgery. The BMD
changes with or without prior TKA were very similar. Therefore, the BMD
changes on the contralteral knees were similar to those noted on the
operated knees in our study. We did not include the data on the
contralateral knees because they were irrevelant to the goal of our study.
We hope that we have adequately answered the questions and addressed the
concerns. |
|
The Effect of Alendronate on Bone Mineral Density |
26 April 2004 |
|
|
Christos Alexandropoulos Trikala General Hospital
Send letter to journal:
Re: The Effect of Alendronate on Bone Mineral Density
alexand8{at}otenet.gr Christos Alexandropoulos
|
To the Editor:
Regarding the article “ The Effect of Aledronate on Bone Mineral
Density in the Distal Part of the Femur and Proximal Part of the Tibia
After Total Knee Replacement” (2003;85:2121-6) by CJ Wang et al, I would
like to make some observations.
In this study aledronate was administered in non osteoporotic
patients and the increased Bone Mineral Content (BMC) of the operated
tibia and femur that measured, considered that possibly improves the
prosthetic fixation of the Total Knee Arthroplasty. This would be good news.
But, surprisingly in this paper there are no data about the BMC
increase of the non operated knee. Since aledronate has
a systematic effect, one can expect an increased BMC in both knees and
eventually on both hips. It is not clear how this
iatrogenic alteration of BMC affects healthy major joints. For example,
one can suppose that BMC increase may lead to subchondral sclerosis and
rapid osteoarthritic degeneration of these joints.
MM Petersen et al(1), investigating the effect of nasal salmon
calcitonin on post-traumatic osteopenia following ankle fracture measured
the BMC in both operated and healthy tibiae and and found a
statistically significant increase on BMC in the healthy leg tibia.
I believe that not only the improvement of the prosthetic components
fixation but the effects of aledronate on the non osteoporotic patients’
major joints must be investigated in order the clinical importance of this
study be evaluated. If the authors have obtained relative data the
clinical follow up will be of great value.
Yours sincerely
Christos Alexandropoulos, MD
Orthopaedic Department of Trikala General Hospital
Reference:
1. Petersen MM, Lauritzen JM, Schwarz P, Lund B. Effect of nasal salmon
calcitonin on post traumatic osteopenia following ankle fracture. A
randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study in 24 patients. Acta
Orthop Scand. 1998 Aug; 69(4): 347-50
Corresponding address:
Christos Alexandropoulos, MD
20, Triantafilou str., 42100
Trikala, Greece
e-mail: alexand8@otenet.gr |
|
Dr. Wang responds: |
21 April 2004 |
|
|
Ching-Jen Wang, M.D., Orthopedic Surgeon Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 833, Jun-Wen Wang, M.D., Lin-Hsiu Weng, M.D., Chia-Chen Hsu, M.D., Chung-Cheng Huang, M.D.
Send letter to journal:
Re: Dr. Wang responds:
w281211{at}adm.cgmh.org.tw Ching-Jen Wang, M.D., et al.
|
To the Editor:
We like to respond to the questions raised by Dr.Alexandropoulos in reference to our recent article entitled "The effect of
alendronate on bone
mineral density ... after total knee arthroplasty" (2003;85:2121-6 Am). We
did measure the BMD on the contralateral knee in this study. The BMD of
the distal femur showed an increase of 11.6% +/- 22.2% in the alendronate
group versus a decrease5.2% +/- 16.6% in the control group at 6 months.
The BMD of the proximal tibia showed an increase of 6.3% +/- 26.5% in the
alendronate group versus a decrease of 2.3% +/- 10/1% in the control
group at 6 months. The data at one year postoperative were much lower.
We
also analysed the BMD data on the contralateral knees into two groups; one
group with prior TKA and the other had no surgery. The BMD changes with
or without prior TKA were very similar. Therefore, the BMD changes on the
contralteral knees were similar to those noted on the operated knees in
our study. We did not include the data on the contralateral knees because
they
were irrevelant to the goal of our study. We hope that we have adequately
answered his questions and concerns. |
|
Dr Wang responds: |
10 February 2004 |
|
|
Ching-Jen Wang, Physician Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Jun-Wein Wang, L H Wend, CC Hsu, CC Huang and HS Chen
Send letter to journal:
Re: Dr Wang responds:
w281211{at}adm.cgmh.org.tw Ching-Jen Wang, et al.
|
Dear Editor,
This is to acknowledge the receipt of the letter to Editor from Tarja A.
Soininvaara regarding our article.
We would like to congratulate them on their study showing
favorable effect of alendronate on periprosthetic bone, findings that are similar to our
study. In their study, patients treated with alendronate plus calcium
maintained distal femur BMD values close to the baseline, while patients who
received only calcium showed significant bone loss during the one-year
post TKA.
The groups differed significantly in BMD in the metaphyseal and
diaphyseal regions of interest. In their study, patients were allowed full
weight bearing immediately after the operation, and the BMD was performed
within one week, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.
In our study, the BMD was performed within one week preoperatively and at
6 and 12 months postoperatively. The geometries of the distal femur and
the proximal tibia for BMD measurements were determined preoperatively.
The same geometries were used for subsequent BMD measurements
postoperatively. Thus, similar measurement areas can be secured and the
values of measurement are reproducible.
We have noted a wide range of BMD
values among the patients. Therefore, we analyzed the results based on the
mean ˇÓ SD values.
In our study, patients were allowed to bear partial weight on the operated
leg for 4 to 6 weeks before full weight bearing. In fact, the majority of
patients were unable to bear full weight for approximately 4 weeks due to
postoperative pain even though they were allowed to do so. Weight bearing
may theoretically affect the BMD; however, short-term partial weight
bearing (4 to 6 weeks) does not seem to cause any detrimental effect on
BMD around the knee.
The BMD measurement of the proximal part of the tibia was divided into
three regions of interest (ROI): the lateral region (ROI-1), the medial
region (ROI-2), and the center region (ROI-3). The medial and lateral
regions were located at 1.0 cm within the cortex and 1.0 cm distal to the
prosthesis-bone interface, and the center region was located at 1.0 cm
distal to the prosthetic stem. We only used one type of prosthesis in this
study, and the prosthesis-bone interface in the medial and lateral regions
can be fair precisely estimated preoperatively. Likewise, the tip of the
prosthesis stem can be determined accordingly. Such measurements can
minimize or eliminate the effect of cement mantle on BMD values.
The BMD
values in the ROIs in Table IV are the average values of BMD measurement
in anteroposterior and lateral projections. These regions were so chosen
because they theoretically sustain the most stress shielding and the
changes in BMD, if any, will most likely occur in these locations.
Overall, we agree with the writer's opinions that there is a favorable effect of alendronate on periprosthetic bone after TKA.
We like to thank the writer for his valuable opinions and comments.
Ching-Jen Wang, M.D. |
|
The Effect of Alendronate on Bone Mineral Density in the Distal Part of the Femur and Proximal Part |
10 February 2004 |
|
|
Tarja A Soininvaara, M.D., Savonlinna Central Hospital, Kuopio University Hospital
Send letter to journal:
Re: The Effect of Alendronate on Bone Mineral Density in the Distal Part of the Femur and Proximal Part
tarja.soininvaara{at}uku.fi Tarja A Soininvaara, et al.
|
To The Editor:
We read with great interest "The Effect of Alendronate on Bone
Mineral Density in the Distal Part of the Femur and Proximal Part of the
Tibia After Total Knee Arthroplasty" by Wang et al. (2003; 85-A:2121-
2126)(1).
We have previously shown the efficacy of oral alendronate with
calcium for the inhibition of early BMD loss after TKA in a prospective,
randomized, one-year follow-up study. Periprosthetic BMD changes were
measured in 19 patients with knee osteoarthrosis with dual-energy X-ray
absorptiometry within a week post-operatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months
follow-up. Patients treated with alendronate+calcium maintained distal
femoral BMD values close to the baseline (from 0.48% to –5.5, P >
0.04), while patients receiving only calcium showed significant bone loss
during the one-year (from –14.3% to –23.6%, P < 0.015). The groups
differed significantly in metaphyseal and diaphyseal regions of interests
(ROI)(2). These ROIs are reproducible, with an average precision error
ranging from 1.3% to 3.1% (3). Full weight-bearing was allowed
immediately after the operation(2-4).
The present study by Wang, et al., raises some questions. The authors used the preoperative
BMD measurement as a baseline reference in their patients. We would like to know the reproducibility of their measurements. How did they verify that they measured the areas in the pre- and
postoperative scans? What is the effect of the cement mantle and
perioperative bone loss on these measurements? What was the duration and the effect of
partial weight-bearing on BMD?
The ranges of BMDs and their percent changes are very
wide. Although the BMD increase at 6 months is marked (10 %) in the study
group, the 12 months change may not be significant (1.9 %).
According to both studies, alendronate treatment seems to
prevent bone loss after TKA. The long-term effect of bisphosphonates in
prevention of aseptic loosening needs to be investigated.
Tarja A Soininvaara, M.D. and Heikki Kröger, M.D., Ph.D
Department of Surgery, Savonlinna Central Hospital, Savonlinna,
Finland.
Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Bone and Cartilage Research Unit (BCRU), University of Kuopio, Kuopio,
Finland.
Tarja.Soininvaara@uku.fi
References
1. Ching-Jen Wang, Jun-Wen Wang, Lin-Hsiu Weng, Chia-Chen Hsu, Chung-
Cheng Huang, Chen. H-S 2003 The Effect of Alendronate on Bone Mineral
Density in the Distal Part of the Femur and Proximal Part of the Tibia
After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:2121-2126.
2. Soininvaara TA, Jurvelin JS, Miettinen HJ, Suomalainen OT, Alhava EM,
Kroger HPJ. 2002 Effect of alendronate on periprosthetic bone loss after
total knee arthroplasty: a one-year, randomized, controlled trial of 19
patients. Calcif Tissue Int. Dec;71(6):472-7.
3. Soininvaara T, Kroger H, Jurvelin JS, Miettinen H, Suomalainen O,
Alhava E 2000 Measurement of bone density around total knee arthroplasty
using fan-beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int Sep
67(3):267-72.
4. Soininvaara TA, Miettinen HJA, Jurvelin JS, Suomalainen OT, Alhava EM,
Kroger HPJ. Periprosthetic femoral bone loss after total knee
arthroplasty: one-year follow-up study of 69 patients. The Knee (In
press). |
|