|
JBJS welcomes reader comments on published articles. Letters to the Editor are reviewed by JBJS editors but are not peer-reviewed. To submit your letter, please follow the "submit a response" link that appears in the content box at the upper right of the full text of the article.
Letters to the Editor to:
-
- Scientific Articles:
Iván F. Rubel, Peter Kloen, Deirdre Campbell, Mark Schwartz, Alan Liew, Elizabeth Myers, and David L. Helfet
- Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Humeral Nonunions : A Biomechanical and Clinical Study
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 1315-1322
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Electronic letters published:
-
Dr. Helfet responds to Dr. Sharma
- DAVID L. HELFET, Ivan F. Rubel, Peter Kloen, Deirdre Campbell, Mark Schwartz, Alan LIew and Elizabeth Myers
(28 August 2003)
-
Additional plate on medial side or lateral side of humerus?
- Ashwini Sharma, Roop Singh, Narender K Magu
(25 August 2003)
|
Dr. Helfet responds to Dr. Sharma |
28 August 2003 |
|
|
DAVID L. HELFET, MD Hospital for Special Surgery, Ivan F. Rubel, Peter Kloen, Deirdre Campbell, Mark Schwartz, Alan LIew and Elizabeth Myers
Send letter to journal:
Re: Dr. Helfet responds to Dr. Sharma
helfetd{at}hss.edu DAVID L. HELFET, et al.
|
Dear Dr. Sharma:
In answer to you questions:
1. Yes, the recon plate can be placed on either side.
2. The number of screws depends on bone quality and length of
segment.
3. The second plate is used if there is micromotion when the construct with one plate is stressed.
David L. Helfet, MD |
|
Additional plate on medial side or lateral side of humerus? |
25 August 2003 |
|
|
Ashwini Sharma, Senior Resident PGIMS, Rohtak, Roop Singh, Narender K Magu
Send letter to journal:
Re: Additional plate on medial side or lateral side of humerus?
ashvinisharma{at}rediffmail.com Ashwini Sharma, et al.
|
OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION OF HUMERAL NONUNIONS
A BIOMECHANICAL AND CLINICAL STUDY
Sir,
We read with interest the article in August, 2002 issue by Rubel et al
titled “Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral nonunions-a
biomechanical and clinical study”
We would ask the authors to comment on three questions.
1.In their clinical study,the authors have augmented the fixation achieved by a
4.5 mm limited contact dynamic compression plate using a lateral 3.5 mm
reconstruction plate. Yet the figure labeled Fig 3-C
shows a 3.5 mm recon plate on the medial (ulnar) side of humerus. Can the recon plate be placed on either side?
2. In their biomechanical study they have used two
additional screws on either side of the fracture site. Fig 3-C and 3-D
show one screw through the distal fragment. How many screws, at the
minimum, should be placed in the distal fragment to provide stability?
3.In both cases in which the preoperative radiographs show little deformity, (figures 2-A, 2-B, 3-A, 3-B) is it necessary to use a 3.5 mm recon
plate and the additional exposure that applying it entails? |
|