To the Editor:
Two valuable articles that appear in the June 2002 issue of the
Journal are those by Waters & Stewart (AVN of the scaphoid in
adolescents) and Luk et al (anterior approach to cerviothoracic junction).
It is interesting to note that the Waters & Stewart paper
includes three (3) patients and is presented in the Jouranl as a scientific study while the
Luk paper with its five (5) patients is presented as a case report
fashion. This begs the question: What constitutes a case report?
The implications of how an article is labeled can be significant.
For instance, when a structured review or meta-analysis is conducted case
reports are almost always automatically eliminated from consideration.
One would certainly hope that an evidence-based reviewer would identify
the Waters & Stewart paper for what it is - an important three (3)
patient case report.