To the Editor:
I would like to direct the attention of the authors of this excellent paper to a mistake that may result in confusion to its readers.
On page 1172, the authors defined the curves type 3 and 6 as follows: Type 3—double major: The main thoracic and thoracolumbar/
lumbar curves are structural, while the proximal
thoracic curve is nonstructural. The main thoracic curve is the major
curve and is greater than, equal to, or no more than 5°less than the Cobb
measurement of the thoracolumbar/lumbar
curve.
Type 6—thoracolumbar/lumbar-main thoracic: The thoracolumbar/lumbar
curve is the major curve and measures at least 5° more than the main
thoracic curve, which is structural. The proximal thoracic curve is
nonstructural.
Then, on pages 1172 and 1173 they
wrote: "If the difference between the lumbar and thoracic curves is
<5°, the scoliosis can be categorized as type 3, 4, or 5 on the basis
of the structural characteristics of the main thoracic and
thoracolumbar/lumbar regions. For the sake of clarity, the major curve
(the curve with the largest Cobb measurement)
always distinguishes between type 3 (main thoracic curve is
major) and type 6 (thoracolumbar/lumbar curve is major). If
the Cobb measurements of the main thoracic and thoracolumbar/lumbar curves
are equal, then the thoracic curve is considered the major curve. Thus in
Figures 4-A through 4-F,the curve classification is type 6."
But by looking at the mentioned figures, I found the lumbar curve
(60°) measuring only 3° more than the main thoracic curve (57°), which is
according to the authors' definition, excludes type 6 and makes the curve
type 3,4 or 5. As long as the proximal thoracic curve is non-structural,
the curve is not type 4. On the other hand, because the main thoracic
curve is structural, the curve is type 3.