The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2009;91:2537-2542.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01126
© 2009 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activities for this article:
CME 4: October, November, December 2009 (publication date January 4, 2010; ...
Shoulder/Elbow Test 29: Winter 2010 (publication date February 16, 2010; ex...
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Porcellini, G.
Right arrow Articles by Paladini, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Porcellini, G.
Right arrow Articles by Paladini, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Shoulder
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Predisposing Factors for Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation After Arthroscopic Treatment

Giuseppe Porcellini, MD1, Fabrizio Campi, MD1, Francesco Pegreffi, MD1, Alessandro Castagna, MD2 and Paolo Paladini, MD1

1 Unit of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, D. Cervesi Hospital, Via LV Beethoven 1, 47841 Cattolica (RN), Italy. E-mail address for G. Porcellini: chirurgiaspalla{at}virgilio.it
2 IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas–Rozzano, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (MI), Italy

Investigation performed at the Unit of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, D. Cervesi Hospital, Cattolica, Italy

A commentary by Brett D. Owens, MD, is available at www.jbjs.org/commentary and as supplemental material to the online version of this article.

Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.


Background: Arthroscopic repair of anterior dislocation of the shoulder can fail. We hypothesized that patients who are at higher risk for redislocation following repair could be recognized preoperatively on the basis of their clinical history. The purpose of the present study was to identify the risk factors for recurrence in a community-based population of patients with traumatic unidirectional instability that was treated with a single arthroscopic technique.

Methods: From January 2000 to December 2003, 625 patients with anterior unidirectional instability were managed with an arthroscopic Bankart technique, and 385 met the criteria for inclusion in the study. Demographic data were collected, and clinical follow-up was performed at three, six, twelve, twenty-four, and thirty-six months.

Results: At thirty-six months, thirty-one patients (8.1%) had experienced a redislocation; the rate was 13.3% among patients who were twenty-two years of age and younger and 6.3% among older patients. Age at the time of the first dislocation, male sex, and the time from the first dislocation until surgery were significant risk factors for recurrence (p < 0.05 for all).

Conclusions: Patients who are more likely to have a redislocation following arthroscopic repair of an anterior shoulder dislocation can be identified preoperatively on the basis of sex, age, and the time from the first dislocation to surgery.

Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?