The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82:1639 (2000)
© 2000 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Patellar Malalignment*
Ronald P. Grelsamer, M.D.
*No benefits in any form have been received or will be received
from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject
of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
Maimonides Medical Center and the Hospital for Joint Diseases,
345 East 37th Street, New York, N.Y. 10016. E-mail address for R.
P. Grelsamer: rgrelsamer{at}pol.net
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Patellar malalignment is underdiagnosed yet too frequently
treated with surgery.
The majority of patients with patellar pain need not undergo
magnetic resonance imaging.
Imaging performed in the office setting is often sufficient to
reveal malalignment and dysplasia.
Rehabilitation protocols need to be specific to the patella.
 Surgery should be tailored to the patient's specific pathology.
Patellar malalignment is a translational or rotational deviation
of the patella relative to any axis, and it can be a major component
of patellar pain in adults. Chondromalacia, the
word that has defined the field of patellar pain during the last
century5,14,92, is now mostly
a source of confusion and should be abandoned19.
Indeed, the presence of soft cartilage - the literal translation
of the term chondromalacia - is not strongly correlated
with patellar pain1,28,175. Moreover,
surgeons often refer to cartilage changes anywhere in the knee as
chondromalacia. The confusion is further compounded by the use of poorly
defined grades (for example, grade-II chondromalacia). Lesions are
best called chondral or cartilage lesions, and they should be described qualitatively
(for example, as blistering or fissuring) and quantitatively (in
terms of size, location, and depth).
The term patellar subluxation is also confusing,
as it can pertain to a symptom, a finding on the physical examination,
or a radiographic observation75.
There is no universally accepted understanding of the term, and
it requires an explanation with each use.
 |
Etiology of Symptoms
|
|---|
Patients with patellar symptoms can be divided into two groups:
those who feel the patella slip, and those who simply have pain.
This slipping, referred to as instability or subluxation, has a
mechanical basis. Several mechanical causes have been proposed.
The vastus medialis obliquus may be proximally positioned and abnormally
oriented, and the timing of its contractions may be poorly synchronized
with those of the surrounding muscles96.
Osteochondral dysplasias, such as a shallow or even a convex trochlear
groove, may be present38,155.
The patella may lie too far proximally or distally relative to the
trochlea, conditions called patella alta and patella baja (or patella
infera), respectively22. Finally,
the patient may exhibit generalized ligamentous laxity or complex
malalignments of the entire extremity181.
Pure patellar pain remains more poorly understood. Chondral lesions
themselves are asymptomatic49,
although cartilage that is worn down to bone remains a potential
source of pain. Ficat et al.55 subscribed
to the concept of patellar malalignment as a source of pain. Specifically,
they hypothesized that if the patella is tilted, lateral side down,
painful stresses can develop on its lateral aspect. This is still
an accepted theory19,51, although
not all tilted patellae are painful. Pain from patellar malalignment
appears to be related to multiple factors with variable clinical
expression45, and our imperfect
understanding of these factors may explain the all-too-frequent
failure to achieve adequate pain relief with the use of realignment procedures.
Malalignment appears to be a necessary but not sufficient condition
for the onset of pain. Symptoms seem to be set off by a trigger,
the nature of which varies from patient to patient. Trauma is a potential
trigger6,19,84,133,163,179. The
presence of nerve-fiber changes in the lateral retinaculum61,64 raises the possibility that these
changes might be a catalyst for pain, although it is not clear whether the
malalignment precedes the nerve changes or vice versa. There are
reports of familial malalignment161,
which lend credence to the concept of malalignment as a possibly
inheritable trait.
Certain disorders of the patella and the extensor mechanism can
be associated with patellar malalignment. These disorders include
neural inflammation61,163, altered
proprioception69,104, venous congestion9, Osgood-Schlatter disease109,130, bipartite patella101,147,165, and inflammation of the
patellar tendon (so-called patellar tendinitis)46,60.
There are also causes of patellar pain unrelated to malalignment,
such as overuse50,131, inflammatory
arthritis, chemical irritation187,
osteochondritis dissecans144,
tumor53, plicae44,
infection, stress fracture149,
reflex sympathetic dystrophy78,
fat-pad inflammation47, dorsal
defects42,175, referred pain from
another site, and emotional disturbances.
 |
Basic Science
|
|---|
In view of the frequent problems associated with the knee, it
is remarkable that much of the time the articulating surfaces are
not in contact. There is no patellofemoral contact in the early
degrees of knee flexion and thus no contact during standing or walking
on level ground. Perhaps this is why symptomatic malalignment is
not even more prevalent than it is.
At any given time, only a portion of the patellar articular cartilage
is in contact with the trochlea. As the knee flexes from 10 to 90
degrees, the contact area shifts gradually from the distal to the
proximal pole of the patella67.
As the knee flexes toward 120 degrees, the contact area moves back
toward the center of the patella. With flexion of greater than 120
degrees, there is no contact between the patella and the medial
femoral condyle, except for that provided by the small, nearly vertical,
odd facet, which is present in 80 percent of people78,111.
In a closed-chain activity, where the leg, foot, and ground form
a continuous kinetic chain, the articular pressure increases as
the knee flexes from 0 to 90 degrees78.
Indeed, the joint-reaction force increases proportionately more
than the magnitude of the contact area78.
From 90 to 120 degrees, the articular pressure remains essentially
unchanged because the quadriceps tendon comes into contact with
the trochlea and effectively increases the contact area.
The articular cartilage of the patella is the thickest in the
body (up to seven millimeters thick), and it is unique in its lack
of conformity with the underlying bone. Thus, the cartilaginous
apex of the patella, when viewed in the axial plane, rarely coincides
with the osseous apex172. The
same is true for the trochlea, but to a lesser extent. The nature
and number of articular facets appear to be unique to each individual111. The biomechanical properties of
the patellar cartilage have been found to differ from those of the trochlea134,135. Specifically, the patellar
cartilage has a greater permeability and a lower compressive aggregate modulus.
For isotropic materials, Young's modulus E, Poisson's ratio ,
and the aggregate modulus HA are related by the equation HA= E(1 - )(1 - 2 )135.
Through most of the flexion-extension cycle, the force generated
by the patellar tendon is lower than that generated by the quadriceps
tendon4,17,25,95. Thus, force
is dissipated as it rounds the patella. As with certain other levers
in the human body, such as the shoulder and the elbow joint, force
is sacrificed for displacement (a lever amplifies force at the expense
of displacement, and vice versa)136.
The insertion site of the normal vastus medialis obliquus is
the medial border of the patella, between one-third to one-half
of the way down from the proximal pole. The vector of the muscle
is medially directed and forms an angle of 50 to 65 degrees with
the mechanical axis of the leg21,108,159.
In patients with malalignment, the vastus medialis obliquus may
not reach the patella, and its most distal portion may remain proximal
to the proximal pole of the patella. The muscle vector is then more
vertical than normal, making it less effective as a dynamic stabilizer64,78. The timing of the vastus medialis
obliquus contractions relative to those of other muscles, especially
the vastus lateralis, is critical and can be abnormal in the setting
of malalignment117.
A tight lateral retinaculum pulls the patella laterally and tilts
it, lateral side down85,128. On
the medial aspect of the patella, the medial patellofemoral ligament,
which originates from the adductor tubercle and inserts on the proximal
two-thirds of the medial aspect of the patella, appears to be the
strongest passive, medial restraint33,85.
It can be stretched in the face of chronic malalignment, and, in
an acute dislocation, it can be torn from its femoral origin or
patellar insertion.
Patellar tracking continues to be the subject of much study88,183. Patellae take a serpentine,
individualistic path when assessed relative to coordinates that
are termed global when they are centered on a testing
jig183. However, when normal patellae
are investigated with use of anatomy-based coordinates, they behave
in a similar manner, assuming a slightly lateralized position in
neutral (0-degree) extension and taking a straight path down the
trochlea as the knee is slightly flexed10,78.
 |
History and Physical Examination
|
|---|
Karlson105, in 1940, noted
that "the diagnosis is difficult to make and the differential diagnosis
of injury to the meniscus . . . causes special difficulties, as
in both these ailments [meniscal and patellar pathology] there is
a pressure tenderness over the medial joint space." Hughston et
al.96 echoed those sentiments
in 1960 and then in 1984, when they stated that "the orthopaedic
surgeon who has not mistaken a recurrent subluxation of the patella
for a torn meniscus has undoubtedly had a very limited and fortunate
experience with knees and meniscectomies." The problem is now magnified
because of the relative ease of performing a meniscectomy. Thus,
arguably, the main problem related to the management of patellar malalignment
is not the treatment itself but recognition of the condition.
The symptom of giving-way should arouse suspicion of patellar
malalignment, although this symptom is shared by other conditions.
Pain occurs when a patient arises from a seated position, climbs
stairs, or squats, as these activities exacerbate the abnormal pressure
distribution about the patella. The so-called movie-theater sign96 - pain with prolonged sitting -
traditionally has been associated with patellar pain from any source.
Venous congestion and stretching of painful tissues are potential
explanations for this symptom. With regard to the diagnosis of patellar malalignment,
the location of the pain is not as helpful as one would expect;
classically, the pain is anterior, but it can also be medial96,105, lateral96,105,
or popliteal99. Unrelenting pain
should arouse suspicion of a neurological condition, such as a neuroma132,156, reflex sympathetic dystrophy,
or radicular pain, especially if the pain is burning in nature.
A number of findings on the physical examination have been correlated
with patellar symptoms, but there is no one sign that is currently
accepted as proof of malalignment157.
The patient should first be examined in the standing position to
assess overall limb alignment as well as to identify gait and foot
abnormalities such as foot pronation. Then, while seated, the patient should
fully extend the knee from a flexed position. A J sign is considered
to be present when the patella assumes a lateralized position as
the knee approaches full extension. The patella is compressed with
the palm of the hand through the full range of motion, as ulcerated
lesions can be tender with this provocative test. Distal lesions
are tender in the early degrees of knee flexion, whereas proximal
lesions are tender at approximately 90 degrees. Crepitus is a nonspecific
finding and can be associated with both cartilaginous and synovial
lesions. With the patient supine and then prone, the hip is flexed
and rotated as the surgeon checks for a source of referred pain
and assesses anteversion96. The
skin, retinacula, quadriceps tendon, and patellar tendon are palpated
to rule out soft-tissue sources of pain. In patients with malalignment,
the vastus medialis obliquus typically cannot be identified by sight
or palpation; it inserts no farther distally than the proximal pole
of the patella, and it remains soft, even with maximal quadriceps
contraction96. With the knee extended,
tilt is assessed by lightly palpating the medial and lateral borders
of the patella. The facets, with intervening soft tissues, can be
tested for tenderness, and overhang of the lateral facet over the
trochlea can occasionally be assessed.
The quadriceps (Q) angle is a measure of the patella's tendency
to move laterally when the quadriceps muscles are contracted70,96. This is defined as the acute
angle formed by an imaginary line connecting the anterior superior
iliac spine to the center of the patella and a line connecting the
center of the patella to the tibial tuberosity. The Q angle is increased
in patients with a lateralized tibial tuberosity, but it can be falsely
normal when the patella is laterally displaced. Different values
for the normal ranges of the Q angle have been reported in the literature, and
slight differences are noted when men are compared with women189, when the patient is assessed standing189, and when the quadriceps are contracted.
With the knee slightly flexed, a Q angle of greater than 20 degrees
is considered to be abnormal96,186,189.
The Q angle is increased in only a small percentage of patients
with patellar pain; as with other clinical signs, an abnormal value
does not necessarily identify the source of pain nor should it be considered
an indication for operative treatment157.
Although increased Q angles are traditionally associated with valgus
knees, some of the highest Q angles are found in patients with a
combination of genu varum and proximal tibial torsion82,96.
Patellar malalignment is associated with tightness of the following
structures (in decreasing order of frequency): the lateral retinaculum,
the hamstrings, the iliotibial band, the quadriceps, the hip rotators,
and the Achilles tendon64,96.
The lateral retinaculum is assessed by way of patellar tilt and
medial-lateral displacement (glide)58,107,117,177.
The Ober test is used to evaluate tightness of the iliotibial band78. For this test, the patient is placed
in the lateral decubitus position, and, with the hip extended and abducted
and the knee flexed, the proximal part of the leg is allowed to
drop passively onto the contralateral limb. The test is considered
positive when the leg fails to drop. Quadriceps tightness is examined
by placing the patient prone and passively bringing the heels toward
the buttocks. The heels should touch the buttocks.
The apprehension sign, whereby the patient becomes apprehensive
as the knee is extended while a laterally directed force is applied
to the patella, is a reflection of extreme malalignment and is therefore
an insensitive screening test for malalignment78.
 |
Imaging
|
|---|
Imaging can confirm a diagnosis of malalignment while further
qualifying and quantifying it; however, it does not automatically
identify the source of pain. A major advance has been the improvement
of conventional radiography performed in an office setting. Few
patients, therefore, require magnetic resonance imaging. The lateral
radiograph reveals whether patella alta or baja (infera) is present.
Although each has slight advantages and disadvantages, there are
a number of simple parameters for the detection of patellar height16,30,37,72,98. Variations in the sagittal
shape of the patella can affect these measurements74. If, on the lateral radiograph,
the posteriormost portions of the femoral condyles overlap precisely, much
information can be obtained with regard to both the trochlea and
the patella (Fig. 1);
for example, patellar tilt can be appreciated. Indeed, the osseous
median ridge of the patella and the radiographic condensation of
the lateral patellar border become confluent as the patella tilts122,137. This sign is particularly
useful when tilt is present near extension but not in flexion. In
this situation, tilt cannot be detected on the Merchant radiograph, since
this image is made with the knee flexed at least 30 degrees, but
it can be detected on lateral radiographs made with the knee extended.
Moreover, when only the most proximal part of the trochlea is dysplastic,
the dysplasia is best noted on the lateral radiograph because this
portion of the trochlea is not visualized on a Merchant radiograph38,122,137. The difference in height
between the osseous trochlea and the condyles is a measure of the
depth of the trochlea. An intersection of the lines therefore indicates
an absence of depth - that is, dysplasia71,122,155.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1: With
superimposition of the posterior condyles on a lateral radiograph
(solid arrow), information can be obtained with regard to patellar
tilt and trochlear geometry. The distance between the subchondral
bone of the trochlea and that of the lateral femoral condyle (double
arrow) is a measure of trochlear depth38,71.
The lateral border of the patella is normally seen as a distinct
condensation just anterior to the posterior (osseous) surface of
the patella (open arrows). As tilt increases, these two lines become confluent122,137.
|
|
Although many tangential views, also known as sunrise views,
have been tried over the last century, the Merchant radiograph127 has emerged as the standard, as
it allows for imaging of the trochlea at 30 degrees of flexion rather than
the common 60 degrees. Also, it does not artificially compress the
patella as do radiographs made with the patient prone. The patient
lies supine, with the calves and feet supported by a table extension.
The degree of flexion is important because malalignment is more
noticeable and more clinically relevant at 30 degrees of flexion
than it is at 60 degrees. Two measures of malalignment are assessed
on the axial radiograph: medial-lateral displacement177 and tilt73.
These two parameters are independent of each other, although they
coexist in the most extreme cases. Lateral displacement can be measured
with use of the congruence angle127,
which is normally negative3. Tilt
can be measured with use of a number of references, including the
(osseous) lateral facet and the anterior aspect of the femoral condyles164. However, the condyles can be dysplastic
in the very patients who are likely to have malalignment; therefore,
they are not ideal references. I prefer a technique that reflects
the assessment of tilt on the physical examination: the drawing
of a line from the medial to the lateral border of the patella as
referenced from any horizontal line drawn on the radiograph73 (Fig. 2). The drawbacks to this approach
are minor: the patient's legs must rest in neutral rotation, and
the lower border of the x-ray cassette must be parallel to the ground.
Normal tilt ranges from 0 to 5 degrees, and tilt angles of greater
than 10 degrees are abnormal69.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2: Tilt is
shown here as the angle subtended by a line drawn across the patella
from its medial to its lateral border and the horizontal line. The
patient's foot must point up, and the lower border of the x-ray
cassette must be parallel to the ground73.
The patient's calves and feet are supported by a simple table extension,
as described by Merchant et al.127.
|
|
Computerized Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging provides static pictures of a relaxed
extensor mechanism in a supine patient. This is a questionable substitute
for the imaging of a standing, active person. Moreover, magnetic
resonance imaging does not effectively detect all chondral lesions.
Nevertheless, because of the difference between the osseous and
cartilaginous contours of the patella, magnetic resonance images
give a more accurate picture of patellofemoral congruence than do
radiographs. With regard to the detection of cartilage lesions,
major advances continue to be made43,115,139,145,154,160.
This is critical, since these lesions can be sources of pain and
need to be considered in any operative planning.
A laterally positioned patella can be found in asymptomatic subjects
when their knees are imaged in full or neutral (0-degree) extension39. However, on routine magnetic resonance
imaging, when the knee is flexed approximately 10 degrees, the normal
patella is centered over the underlying femur77.
Because the quadriceps are relaxed, magnetic resonance imaging can
underestimate tilt and lateral displacement79.
Computerized tomography can be used to superimpose images, as
when the position of the tibial tuberosity is assessed relative
to the trochlear groove68. Tilting
of the patella has been evaluated. With tilt defined as the angle
subtended by a line drawn along the posterior femoral condyles (or
a line parallel to it) and by a line along the osseous lateral facet
of the patella (Fig. 3), angles of greater than 7 degrees
were found to be normal (at 15 degrees of knee flexion)64.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3: Tilt on
computed tomography, as defined by Fulkerson64.
The angle comprises a line drawn along the osseous lateral facet
of the patella and a line tangent to the posterior femoral condyles
(dotted line) or parallel to that tangent.
|
|
Nuclear Imaging
Technetium scanning is the only test that provides insight into
bone metabolism and homeostasis. In some patients with patellar
pain, increased activity has been noted about the patella48. A positive scan does not differentiate
between the possible causes of patellar pain, but it can validate a
patient's complaints.
 |
Serum Evaluation
|
|---|
Patients with inflammatory arthritis may present initially with
patellar pain, and the arthrosis can at first be localized to the
patellofemoral joint. This is of particular interest if a patellectomy
or a patellofemoral replacement is contemplated. The serum evaluation
should include tests for the uric acid level, erythrocyte sedimentation
rate, rheumatoid factor, and antinuclear antibodies. Consideration
can also be given to testing for the Lyme disease titer, the HLA-B27
genetic marker, and tuberculosis.
 |
Natural History
|
|---|
Pain from malalignment is likely to persist or recur unless the
subject modifies his or her activities. On the other hand, the natural
history of a dislocation resulting from malalignment depends on
the extent of the malalignment and the age of the patient27,35,120. The greater the underlying
malalignment, the greater the tendency of the dislocation to recur86. Also, the younger the age at the
time of the initial dislocation, the greater the predisposition
to recurrent instability27. Over
time, recurrent dislocations tend to decrease in frequency27,35, but each episode is still very
painful and a potential source of chondral damage. A patellar dislocation
mandates that a radiograph and possibly a magnetic resonance imaging
scan be made. Arthroscopy and realignment procedures are not essential
after an initial dislocation but are reasonable options when there
is a suspicion of loose bodies or severe malalignment. Arthritis
is a long-term risk with or without an operation7,102,121.
It remains unclear to what extent a child's trochlea can remodel
following a realignment procedure.
 |
Nonoperative Treatment
|
|---|
Most patellar pain diminishes with nonoperative treatment89. Patellar pain resulting from overuse
will most likely decrease with rest, anti-inflammatory medications,
and standard physical therapy regimens. Patients with malalignment
require a more patella-specific approach78,
since commonly used exercises can aggravate the pain and standard
knee protocols fail to specifically address the malalignment. Stretching
is the hallmark of a patellar malalignment rehabilitation protocol,
which includes stretching of the lateral retinaculum, the iliotibial
band, the hamstring muscles, the quadriceps, and the Achilles tendon117,186.
Strengthening of the vastus medialis obliquus - the main dynamic
stabilizer of the knee - is one of the main goals of patellar rehabilitation,
but it remains unclear to what extent there are specific and preferential
exercises for this muscle. As a rule, strengthening of the quadriceps
is beneficial as long as it does not cause pain. There is controversy
with regard to whether the exercises should be performed in an open
or closed-chain manner173. Alternating
between the two can sometimes allow pain-free training throughout
the full arc of knee motion. Exercises can be modified according to
the location of cartilage lesions; early flexion activities are
discouraged when patellar lesions are distal, and exercises at approximately
90 degrees of flexion are avoided in the presence of proximal lesions.
Coordination of muscle activity is as important as strength-training.
The interplay between the vastus medialis obliquus and the vastus
lateralis continues to be of great interest, and biofeedback with
surface electrodes has been used as an adjunct to therapy78,106,188.
Braces are prescribed to modify the position of the patella.
These devices range from simple straps across the patellar tendon
to complex supports. Although they relieve symptoms in a number
of patients, their mode of action remains speculative and their
effectiveness is unpredictable158,169.
The goal of taping116,117,158 is
to pull the patella away from a painful area, thereby unloading
it and providing pain relief. The extent to which this is possible
and the amount of displacement required to provide pain relief varies from
patient to patient. Displacement need not be perceptible to effect
improvement. A secondary goal is to inhibit muscle-firing by taping
perpendicular to the direction of the muscle fibers124,125. For example, taping across
an overly powerful vastus lateralis can diminish its pull116,117.
Knee mechanics are affected by the position of the foot during
gait; in certain patients, some aspects of patellar pain can be
attributed to an abnormal foot. For example, foot pronation imparts
internal torsion to the tibia and a valgus moment at the knee. It
is therefore reasonable, for selected patients, to prescribe an
orthotic device for the shoe78,153.
 |
Operative Treatment
|
|---|
When clinical improvement with nonoperative treatment has ceased,
operative intervention may be required. These operations can be
divided into three categories: proximal realignment, distal realignment,
and operations that are not intended to change the alignment of
the extensor mechanism.
Proximal realignment: These procedures alter
the medial-lateral position of the patella through manipulation
of the soft tissues proximal to its inferior pole. Included in this category
are lateral retinacular release36,56,90,107,124,128,148,
medial plication96,100,190, vastus
medialis obliquus advancement115,
and medial patellofemoral ligament repair and reconstruction66,85.
Distal realignment: These operations modify
the medial-lateral, anterior-posterior, and proximal-distal31,170 positions of the patella by
way of transfers of the tibial tuberosity or through surgery on
the soft tissues distal to the inferior pole. They include medial
transfer of the patellar tendon162;
medial transfer of the lateral portion of the patellar tendon65; anterior displacement of the tibial
tuberosity52,54,103,113,123,151,166;
medial displacement of the tibial tuberosity34,180;
anteromedial displacement of the tibial tuberosity15,62,174; distal, medial, and posterior
transfer of the tibial tuberosity83;
semitendinosus transfer13; plication
of the patellar tendon23; and
miscellaneous osteotomies of the tibial tuberosity114.
Operations not intended to change the alignment of the
extensor mechanism: These procedures include arthroscopic
synovectomy and débridement59;
denervation of the patella40,94;
cartilage146, periosteal93, and osteochondral grafting11; chondrocyte culture and transplantation146; microfracture146;
patellar osteotomy117,140,184;
prosthetic replacement8,18,26,76,81,129;
and patellectomy2,29,112,191.
It remains to be determined whether the surgeon should identify
the pathoanatomy of each patient and plan operative treatment individually63 or whether there are one or more
procedures that will be satisfactory for most patients. Some surgeons
have performed distal realignment for instability regardless of
the pathology and have reported success with this approach57,138, while others have achieved
the same results with proximal realignment100.
No long-term and few medium-term results have been reported for
the more common procedures, to my knowledge. The trend is toward
recreating the normal anatomy and thus toward customizing the procedure
to the patient's specific pathoanatomy168. No realignment procedures, including
lateral retinacular release, are indicated for patients with poorly
defined pain, as such procedures may lead to malalignment97. Moreover, even a so-called minor
procedure such as lateral retinacular release is associated with
a definite rate of complications such as hematoma167.
Operations that are rarely performed any longer include the Hauser
procedure83, in which the tibial
tuberosity is transferred distally, medially, and posteriorly. Late
results of this operation have included a high rate of patellofemoral
arthritis, presumably because of the excessive tightening of the
extensor mechanism80,141. It is
the posterior-displacement component of the transfer that is currently
thought to be a problem. The Goldthwait operation65,
in which the lateral portion of the patellar tendon is transferred
medially under the remaining tendon, successfully diminishes the
lateral translation of the patella but at the potential expense
of increasing patellar tilt (lateral side down)178.
For any operation involving a transfer of the tibial tuberosity,
the tendency has been to include a longer rather than a shorter
portion of the tuberosity151.
This minimizes the risk of splintering the bone and losing fixation.
In the case of an anterior displacement procedure, the longer tuberosity
piece minimizes the acuteness of the angle between it and the tibial
shaft, leading to a better cosmetic result and perhaps to less risk
of tendinitis. Some investigators have recommended rotation of the entire
tibia rather than transfer of the tuberosity126.
In the patient with open epiphyses, it is prudent to approach tibial
tuberosity procedures with caution in order to avoid creating a
growth arrest at the apophysis and eventual recurvatum. Soft-tissue procedures
about the tuberosity are an acceptable alternative20.
The greatest challenges involve patients with major trochlear
dysplasia and those with arthritic lesions localized to the patella
or the trochlea. When the proximal surface of the trochlea is convex
rather than concave, realignment procedures are usually unsuccessful.
The patella will continue to subluxate either laterally or medially,
and attempts to tighten the extensor mechanism may lead to arthritis.
It is important to detect these dysplasias preoperatively, both
to construct a realistic operative plan - an isolated lateral release,
for example, will not work - and to provide the patient with adequate
data on which to base informed consent. Attempts to change the shape
of the trochlea have been disappointing125,
although research in this area continues.
When dealing with arthritic lesions, there are a number of options.
Stresses on the lesions can be minimized by displacement of the
patella; fresh cartilage can be implanted through chondral and osteochondral
transplantation as well as through cartilage culture followed by
reimplantation146; the subchondral
bone of the arthritic bed can be drilled or fractured to stimulate
the formation of cartilage146;
resurfacing can be performed with a patellar or trochlear replacement26; or a partial or total patellectomy
can be carried out12,191. The
choice of procedure seems to be dictated at least in part by the
size, nature, depth, and location of the lesions. Thus, to the extent
possible it is important to obtain this information at the time
of arthroscopy. The Maquet procedure123 is
now rarely performed in Europe, its place of origin, perhaps because
it had been used too enthusiastically and indiscriminately in patients
with patellar pain and diffuse arthritis. This procedure preferentially
unloads the distal half of the patella54 and
may be more suited for distal patellar lesions. Its use has not
been formally studied for trochlear lesions. Anteromedialization
of the tibial tuberosity, popularized in the United States by Fulkerson62,64, seems best suited for distal-lateral
lesions of the patella64. Lateral
release and medial plication are indicated for lateral lesions78. Medial lesions are most troublesome,
as malaligned patellae usually require medialization and this may
increase the stresses on the arthritic areas. The Pridie technique
of drilling the subchondral bone has yielded unpredictable results,
as has the spongialization technique of Ficat et al.56, in which all subchondral bone is
removed. Various types of partial patellectomy have been reported78,118, although without much corroboration
or follow-up to date. These procedures seem to make eventual resurfacing
more difficult.
Patellectomy has been performed at least since 1860, sometimes
on a relatively routine basis. This reflects an incomplete understanding
of patellar mechanics by the surgeon24,41,91.
Many variations of this procedure have been described12,32,171,185, and although some patients
report a strong knee and an absence of pain, it is not a predictable
procedure with regard to strength or pain relief. Moreover, it is
a resection arthroplasty that cannot be readily reversed.
Prosthetic resurfacing can provide excellent results when evaluated
in the context of a knee replacement. Because of the lack of long-term results,
there is a natural reluctance to perform isolated patellar resurfacing,
especially in young patients.
 |
Pain Following Patellar Surgery
|
|---|
Persistent pain following patellar realignment presents a unique
challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon. In addition to considering
all of the potential causes of patellar pain in a patient who has
not been operated on, the surgeon must investigate whether the realignment
was insufficient or excessive. Moreover, soft tissues may have stretched, rendering
ineffective a realignment that was originally successful. Neuromas
at the incision or portal sites132,
patella baja143,152, and reflex
sympathetic dystrophy must also be considered as possible causes
of postoperative pain. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy may not be full-blown,
as the classic features of hypoesthesia, coolness, and stiffness
may be absent. Relief of pain with use of sympathetic blocks is
diagnostic of reflex sympathetic dystrophy, and the blocks also
may be curative78. Anesthetic
injections in and about the knee can help to differentiate between
intra-articular and extra-articular pathology.
 |
Overview
|
|---|
Although patellar subluxation and dislocation are associated
with well defined anatomical abnormalities, patellar pain is less
clearly understood. It appears to be caused by a number of factors,
which have a variable clinical expression. In adults, patellar malalignment
is one of these factors. The nonoperative treatment of patellar
malalignment must involve a program, specific to the patella, that
is designed to stretch the hamstring muscles and the lateral knee
structures, to bring the patella both actively and passively toward
the center of the knee, to improve the strength and timing pattern
of the quadriceps muscles, and to desensitize inflamed structures.
In the few patients who require operative intervention, attempts
should be made to address specific identifiable pathology.
Note: The author especially wishes to thank the members of the
Patellofemoral Study Group and guests, including P. Aichroth, A.
Amis, E. Arendt, G. Bellier, H. Berieter, R. Biedert, D. Buuck,
R. Cautilli, E. Cohen, J. Cox, D. Dejour, P. Djian, J.-Y. Dupont,
Z. Duri, S. Dye, J. Farr, D. Fithian, N. Friederich, D. Fritschy,
J. Fulkerson, C. Guier, J. Hart, R. Hoekman, D. Marshall, J. McConnell,
A. Merchant, J. Minkoff, B. Moyen, T. Muellmer, E.-O. Muench, P.
Neyret, W. Post, V. Sanchis-Alfonso, R. Scapinelli, H.-U. Stüubli,
O. Siegrist, R. Teitge, G. Terry, N. Thomson, J. Valloton, and J. van
Overschelde.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Abernethy, P. J.; Townsend, P.
R.; Rose, R. M.; and Radin, E. L.: Is chondromalacia patella a separate
clinical entity? J. Bone and Joint Surg., 60-B(2): 205-210, 1978.
-
Ackroyd, C. E., and Polyzoides, A.
J.: Patellectomy for osteoarthritis. A study of eighty-one patients
followed from two to twenty-two years. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,
60-B(3): 353-357, 1978.
-
Aglietti, P.; Insall, J. N.; and Cerulli,
G.: Patellar pain and incongruence. I: Measurements of incongruence.
Clin. Orthop., 176: 217-224, 1983.
-
Ahmed, A. M.; Burke, D. L.; and Hyder,
A.: Force analysis of the patellar mechanism. J. Orthop. Res., 5:
69-85, 1987.
-
Aleman, O.: Chondromalacia post traumatica patellae.
Acta Orthop. Scandinavica, 63: 149-189, 1928.
-
Armstrong, C. G.; Mow, V. C.; and
Wirth, C. R.: Biomechanics of impact-induced microdamage to articular
cartilage: a possible genesis for chondromalacia patella. In American
Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Symposium on Sports Medicine: The
Knee, pp. 70-84. Edited by G. Finerman. St. Louis, C. V. Mosby,
1985.
-
Arnbjörnsson, A.; Egund, N.; Rydling,
O.; Stockerup, R.; and Ryd, L.: The natural history of recurrent
dislocation of the patella. Long-term results of conservative and
operative treatment. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 74-B(1): 140-142,
1992.
-
Arnbjörnsson, A. H., and Ryd, L.:
The use of isolated patellar prostheses in Sweden 1977-1986. Internat.
Orthop., 22: 141-144, 1998.
-
Arnoldi, C. C.: Patellar pain. Acta
Orthop. Scandinavica, Supplementum 244, pp. 1-29, 1991.
-
Ateshian, G. A.; Kwak, S. D.; Soslowsky,
L. J.; and Mow, V. C.: A stereophotogrammetric method for determining
in situ contact areas in diarthrodial joints, and a comparison with
other methods. J. Biomech., 27: 111-124, 1994.
-
Bakay, A.; Csönge, L.; and Fekete,
L.: A mushroom-shaped osteochondral patella allograft. Internat.
Orthop., 20: 370-372, 1996.
-
Baker, C. L., and Hughston, J. C.:
Miyakawa patellectomy. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 70-A: 1489-1494,
Dec. 1988.
-
Baker, R. H.; Carroll, N.; Dewar,
F. P.; and Hall, J. E.: The semitendinosus tenodesis for recurrent
dislocation of the patella. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 54-B(1): 103-109,
1972.
-
Bandi, W.: Chondromalacia of the
patella. Etiology and pathogenesis, clinical aspects, therapy and
prognosis. Zeitschr. Unfallmed. Berufskr., 75: 155-160, 1982.
-
Bellemans, J.; Cauwenberghs, F.;
Witvrouw, E.; Brys, P.; and Victor, J.: Anteromedial tibial tubercle
transfer in patients with chronic anterior knee pain and a subluxation-type
patellar malalignment. Am. J. Sports Med., 25: 375-381, 1997.
-
Bernageau, J., and Goutallier, D.:
Affections femoro-patellaires. Radiodiagnostic II. Encyclopéd. méd.
chir., 31: 312, 1977.
-
Bishop, R. E. D., and Denham, R.
A.: A note on the ratio between tensions in the quadriceps tendon
and infrapatellar ligament. Eng. Med., 6: 53-54, 1977.
-
Blazina, M. E.; Fox, J. M.; Del Pizzo,
W.; Broukhim, B.; and Ivey, F. M.: Patellofemoral replacement. Clin.
Orthop., 144: 98-102, 1979.
-
Boden, B. P.; Pearsall, A. W.; Garrett,
W. E., Jr.; and Feagin, J. A., Jr.: Patellofemoral instability:
evaluation and management. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surgeons, 5: 47-57,
1997.
-
Bonnard, C.; Nocquet, P.; Sollogoub,
I.; and Glorion, B.: Instabilité rotulienne chez l'enfant. Résultat
de la transposition du tiers interne du tendon rotulien. Rev. chir.
orthop., 76: 473-479, 1990.
-
Bose, K.; Kanagasuntheram, R.; and
Osman, M. B. H.: Vastus medialis oblique: an anatomic and physiologic
study. Orthopedics, 3: 880-883, 1980.
-
Brattström, H.: Patella alta in non-dislocating knee
joints. Acta Orthop. Scandinavica, 41: 578-588, 1970.
-
Brief, L. P.: Lateral patellar instability:
treatment with a combined open-arthroscopic approach. Arthroscopy,
9: 617-623, 1993.
-
Brooke, R.: The treatment of fractured
patella by excision. A study of morphology and function. British
J. Surg., 24: 733-747, 1937.
-
Buff, H. U.; Jones, L. C.; and Hungerford,
D. S.: Experimental determination of forces transmitted through
the patello-femoral joint. J. Biomech., 21: 17-23, 1988.
-
Cartier, P.; Sanouiller, J. L.; and
Grelsamer, R.: Patellofemoral arthroplasty. 2-12 year follow-up study.
J. Arthroplasty, 5: 49-55, 1990.
-
Cash, J. D., and Hughston, J. C.:
Treatment of acute patellar dislocation. Am. J. Sports Med., 16: 244-249,
1988.
-
Casscells, S. W.: Gross pathological
changes in the knee joint of the aged individual: a study of 300
cases. Clin. Orthop., 132: 225-232, 1978.
-
Castaing, J.; Castellani, L.; Plisson,
J.-L.; and Delplace, J.: La patellectomie totale. Technique et résultats.
Rev. chir. orthop., 55: 259-278, 1969.
-
Caton, J.; Deschamps, G.; Chambat,
P.; Lerat, J. L.; and Dejour, H.: Les rotules basses. A propos de
128 observations. Rev. chir. orthop., 68: 317-325, 1982.
-
Caton, J.; Mironneau, A.; Walch,
G.; Levigne, C.; and Michel, C. R.: La rotule haute idiopathique chez
l'adolescent. A propos de 61 cas opérés. Rev. chir. orthop., 76:
253-260, 1990.
-
Compere, C. L.; Hill, J. A.; Lewinnek,
G. E.; and Thompson, R. G.: A new method of patellectomy for patellofemoral
arthritis. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 61-A: 714-718, July 1979.
-
Conlan, T.; Garth, W. P., Jr.; and
Lemons, J. E.: Evaluation of the medial soft-tissue restraints of the
extensor mechanism of the knee. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 75-A: 682-693,
May 1993.
-
Cox, J. S.: Evaluation of the Roux-Elmslie-Trillat
procedure for knee extensor realignment. Am. J. Sports Med., 10:
303-310, 1982.
-
Crosby, E. B., and Insall, J.: Recurrent
dislocation of the patella. Relation of treatment to osteoarthritis.
J. Bone and Joint Surg., 58-A: 9-13, Jan. 1976.
-
Dandy, D. J., and Griffiths, D.:
Lateral release for recurrent dislocation of the patella. J. Bone
and Joint Surg., 71-B(1): 121-125, 1989.
-
de Carvalho, A.; Holst Andersen,
A.; Topp, S.; and Jurik, A. G.: A method for assessing the height of
the patella. Internat. Orthop., 9: 195-197, 1985.
-
Dejour, H.; Walch, G.; Neyret, P.;
and Adeleine, P.: La dysplasie de la trochlée fémorale. Rev. chir.
orthop., 76: 45-54, 1990.
-
Delgado-Martins, H.: A study of the
position of the patella using computerised tomography. J. Bone and
Joint Surg., 61-B(4): 443-444, 1979.
-
Dellon, A. L.; Mont, M. A.; Mullick,
T.; and Hungerford, D. S.: Partial denervation for persistent neuroma
pain around the knee. Clin. Orthop., 329: 216-222, 1996.
-
Denham, R. A., and Bishop, R. E.
D.: Mechanics of the knee and problems in reconstructive surgery.
J. Bone and Joint Surg., 60-B(3): 345-352, 1978.
-
Denham, R. H., Jr.: Dorsal defect
of the patella. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 66-A: 116-120, Jan. 1984.
-
Deutsch, A. L.; Shellock, F. G.;
and Mink, J. H.: Imaging of the patellofemoral joint: emphasis on
advanced techniques. In The Patellofemoral Joint, pp. 75-104. Edited
by J. M. Fox and W. Del Pizzo. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1993.
-
Dupont, J.-Y.: Synovial plicae of
the knee. The Knee, 1: 5-19, 1994.
-
Dupont, J. Y.: Pathologie douloureuse
fémoro-patellaire; analyse et classification. J. Traumatol. Sport,
14: 30-48, 1997.
-
Duri, Z. A. A., and Aichroth, P.
M.: Patellar tendonitis: clinical and literature review. Knee Surg.,
Sports Traumatol., Arthrosc., 3: 95-100, 1995.
-
Duri, Z. A.; Aichroth, P. M.; and
Dowd, G.: The fat pad. Clinical observations. Am. J. Knee Surg.,
9: 55-66, 1996.
-
Dye, S. F., and Chew, M. H.: The
use of scintigraphy to detect increased osseous metabolic activity
about the knee. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 75-A: 1388-1406, Sept.
1993.
-
Dye, S. F., and Vaupel, G. L.: The
pathophysiology of patellofemoral pain. Sports Med. and Arthrosc.
Rev., 2: 203-210, 1994.
-
Dye, S. F.; Stüubli, H.-U.; Biedert,
R. M.; and Vaupel, G. L.: The mosaic of pathophysiology causing
patellofemoral pain: therapeutic implications. Op. Tech. Sports
Med., 7: 46-54, 1999.
-
Eckstein, F.; Müller-Gerbl, M.; and
Putz, R.: Die Verteilung der Knorpeldegeneration an der menschlichen
Patellain Beziehungzur individuellen subchondralen mineralisierung.
Zeitschr. Orthop. Grenzgeb., 132: 405-411, 1994.
-
Ferguson, A. B., Jr.: Elevation of
the insertion of the patellar ligament for patellofemoral pain.
J. Bone and Joint Surg., 64-A: 766-771, June 1982.
-
Ferguson, P. C.; Griffin, A. M.;
and Bell, R. S.: Primary patellar tumors. Clin. Orthop., 336: 199-204,
1997.
-
Ferrandez, L.; Usabiaga, J.; Yubero,
J.; Sagarra, J.; and de No, L.: An experimental study of the redistribution
of patellofemoral pressures by the anterior displacement of the
anterior tuberosity of the tibia. Clin. Orthop., 238: 183-189, 1989.
-
Ficat, P.; Ficat, C.; and Bailleux,
A.: Syndrome d'hyperpression externe de la rotule (SHPE). Son intérêt
pour la connaissance de l'arthrose. Rev. chir. orthop., 61: 39-59,
1975.
-
Ficat, P.; Gédéon, P.; Léger, M.;
and Boussaton, M.: Résultats des arthrolyses externes et des spongialisations.
Rev. chir. orthop., 66: 268-272, 1980.
-
Fielding, J. W.; Liebler, W. A.;
Krishne Urs, N. D.; Wilson, S. A.; and Puglisi, A. S.: Tibial tubercle
transfer: a long-range follow-up study. Clin. Orthop., 144: 43-44,
1979.
-
Fithian, D. C.; Mishra, D. K.; Balen,
P. F.; Stone, M. L.; and Daniel, D. M.: Instrumented measurement
of patellar mobility. Am. J. Sports Med., 23: 607-615, 1995.
-
Frederico, D. J., and Reider, B.:
Results of isolated patellar debridement for patellofemoral pain in
patients with normal patellar alignment. Am. J. Sports Med., 25:
663-669, 1997.
-
Fritschy, D., and de Gautard, R.:
Jumper's knee and ultrasonography. Am. J. Sports Med., 16: 637-640,
1988.
-
Fulkerson, J. P., and Gossling,
H. R.: Anatomy of the knee joint lateral retinaculum. Clin. Orthop.,
153: 183-188, 1980.
-
Fulkerson, J. P.: Anteromedialization
of the tibial tuberosity for patellofemoral malalignment. Clin.
Orthop., 177: 176-181, 1983.
-
Fulkerson, J. P.; Schutzer, S. F.;
Ramsby, G. R.; and Bernstein, R. A.: Computerized tomography of
the patellofemoral joint before and after lateral release or realignment.
Arthroscopy, 3: 19-24, 1987.
-
Fulkerson, J. P.: Disorders of the
Patellofemoral Joint. Ed. 3. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1997.
-
Goldthwait, J. E.: Slipping or recurrent
dislocation of the patella. With the report of eleven cases. Boston
Med. and Surg. J., 150: 169-174, 1904.
-
Gomes, J. L.: Medial patellofemoral
ligament reconstruction for recurrent dislocation of the patella:
a preliminary report. Arthroscopy, 8: 335-340, 1992.
-
Goodfellow, J.; Hungerford, D. S.;
and Zindel, M.: Patello-femoral joint mechanics and pathology. 1:
Functional anatomy of the patello-femoral joint. J. Bone and Joint
Surg., 58-B(3): 287-290, 1976.
-
Goutallier, D.; Bernageau, J.; and
Lecudonnec, B.: Mesure de l'écart tubérosité tibiale antérieure
- gorge de la trochleé (T.A.-G.T.). Technique. Résultats. Intérêt.
Rev. chir. orthop., 64: 423-428, 1978.
-
Grabiner, M. D.; Koh, T. J.; and
Draganich, L. F.: Neuromechanics of the patellofemoral joint. Med.
and Sci. Sports and Exerc., 26: 10-21, 1994.
-
Grana, W. A., and Kriegshauser,
L. A.: Scientific basis of extensor mechanism disorders. Clin. Sports
Med., 4: 247-257, 1985.
-
Grelsamer, R. P., and Tedder, J.
L.: The lateral trochlear sign. Femoral trochlear dysplasia as seen on
a lateral view roentgenograph. Clin. Orthop., 281: 159-162, 1992.
-
Grelsamer, R. P., and Meadows, S.:
The modified Insall-Salvati ratio for assessment of patellar height.
Clin. Orthop., 282: 170-176, 1992.
-
Grelsamer, R. P.; Bazos, A. N.;
and Proctor, C. S.: Radiographic analysis of patellar tilt. J. Bone
and Joint Surg., 75-B(5): 822-824, 1993.
-
Grelsamer, R. P.; Proctor, C. S.;
and Bazos, A. N.: Evaluation of patellar shape in the sagittal plane.
A clinical analysis. Am. J. Sports Med., 22: 61-66, 1994.
-
Grelsamer, R. P.: Patellofemoral
semantics. The Tower of Babel. The International Patellofemoral
Study Group. Am. J. Knee Surg., 10: 92-95, 1997.
-
Grelsamer, R. P.: Patellofemoral
arthroplasty. Tech. Orthop., 12: 200-204, 1997.
-
Grelsamer, R. P.; Newton, P. M.;
and Staron, R. B.: The medial-lateral position of the patella on routine
magnetic resonance imaging: when is normal not normal? Arthroscopy,
14: 23-28, 1998.
-
Grelsamer, R. P., and McConnell,
J.: The Patella: A Team Approach. Gaithersburg, Maryland, Aspen,
1998.
-
Guzzanti, V.; Gigante, A.; Di Lazzaro,
A.; and Fabbriciani, C.: Patellofemoral malalignment in adolescents.
Computerized tomographic assessment with or without quadriceps contraction.
Am. J. Sports Med., 22: 55-60, 1994.
-
Hampson, W. G. J., and Hill, P.:
Late results of transfer of the tibial tubercle for recurrent dislocation
of the patella. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 57-B(2): 209-213, 1975.
-
Harrington, K. D.: Long-term results
for the McKeever patellar resurfacing prosthesis used as a salvage
procedure for severe chondromalacia patellae. Clin. Orthop., 279:
201-213, 1992.
-
Harrison, M. M.; Cooke, T. D. V.;
Fisher, S. B.; and Griffin, M. P.: Patterns of knee arthrosis and
patellar subluxation. Clin. Orthop., 309: 56-63, 1994.
-
Hauser, E. D. W.: Total tendon transplant
for slipping patella. A new operation for recurrent dislocation
of the patella. Surg., Gynec. and Obstet., 66: 199-213, 1938.
-
Haut, R. C.: Contact pressures in
the patellofemoral joint during impact loading on the human flexed
knee. J. Orthop. Res., 7: 272-280, 1989.
-
Hautamaa, P. V.; Fithian, D. C.;
Kaufman, K. R.; Daniel, D. M.; and Pohlmeyer, A. M.: Medial soft
tissue restraints in lateral patellar instability and repair. Clin.
Orthop., 349: 174-182, 1998.
-
Hawkins, R. J.; Bell, R. H.; and
Anisette, G.: Acute patellar dislocations. The natural history. Am.
J. Sports Med., 14: 117-120, 1986.
-
Hayes, C. W.; Sawyer, R. W.; and
Conway, W. F.: Patellar cartilage lesions: in vitro detection and
staging with MR imaging and pathologic correlation. Radiology, 176:
479-483, 1990.
-
Heegaard, J.; Leyvraz, P.-F.; Van
Kampen, A.; Rakotomanana, L.; Rubin, P. J.; and Blankevoort, L.:
Influence of soft structures on patellar three-dimensional tracking.
Clin. Orthop., 299: 235-243, 1994.
-
Henry, J. H., and Crosland, J. W.:
Conservative treatment of patellofemoral subluxation. Am. J. Sports
Med., 7: 12-14, 1979.
-
Henry, J. H.; Goletz, T. H.; and
Williamson, B.: Lateral retinacular release in patellofemoral subluxation.
Indications, results, and comparison to open patellofemoral reconstruction.
Am. J. Sports Med., 14: 121-129, 1986.
-
Hey Groves, E. W.: A note on the
extension apparatus of the knee-joint. British J. Surg., 24: 747-748,
1936.
-
Hirsch, C.: Contribution to the
pathogenesis of chondromalacia of the patella. A physical, histologic
and chemical study. Acta Chir. Scandinavica, Supplementum 83, 1944.
-
Hoikka, V. E.; Jaroma, H. J.; and
Ritsila, V. A.: Reconstruction of the patellar articulation with periosteal
grafts. 4-year follow-up of 13 cases. Acta Orthop. Scandinavica,
61: 36-39, 1990.
-
Horner, G., and Dellon, A. L.: Innervation
of the human knee joint and implications for surgery. Clin. Orthop.,
301: 221-226, 1994.
-
Huberti, H. H.; Hayes, W. C.; Stone,
J. L.; and Shybut, G. T.: Force ratios in the quadriceps tendon
and ligamentum patellae. J. Orthop. Res., 2: 49-54, 19
|