This Article Extract Full Text (PDF) Free Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Rights and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by KARAS, E. H. Articles by IANNOTTI, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by KARAS, E. H. Articles by IANNOTTI, J. P. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Failed Repair of the Rotator Cuff. Evaluation and Treatment of Complications*

EVAN H. KARAS, M.D.and and JOSEPH P. IANNOTTI, M.D., PH.D., PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

An Instructional Course Lecture. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

	Introduction

Top Introduction Errors in Diagnosis Errors in Operative Technique Postoperative Complications Persistent Defects of the... References

 
Operative repair of a tear of the rotator cuff usually provides relief of pain^{8,21,22,36,41,48,54}. Restoration of strength is somewhat less predictable, but the rate of over-all patient satisfaction after primary repair of the rotator cuff has been reported to be as high as 91 per cent in a series of 340 shoulders^21,36. Improved operative techniques that have been developed over the last several decades have been largely responsible for this success. However, operative repairs do fail. These failures present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, as they may be due to multiple reasons. Identification of the cause in a given patient requires a thorough evaluation that includes a complete history, physical examination, and review of the radiographs and the ancillary studies. Only then can an effective treatment plan be established. Although the results of repair of recurrent tears of the rotator cuff have not been as satisfactory as those of primary repair^{5,10,37,47,54}, proper diagnosis and treatment can greatly increase the chance for success.

The major reasons for failure of repair of the rotator cuff are an incomplete or incorrect diagnosis; postoperative complications; errors in operative technique; and errors in or poor performance of postoperative rehabilitation, or both. A combination of these factors may be responsible for a poor result in a given patient. The clinical evaluation of these parameters must be extremely thorough in order to avoid failure of treatment.

A careful history, including a review of the medical record, operative notes, and preoperative and postoperative imaging studies, must be obtained. This information should allow the preoperative diagnosis to be established on the basis of both the clinical data and the anatomical abnormalities. An inaccurate or incomplete diagnosis or an error in the execution of the operative procedure or the postoperative rehabilitation program may then be revealed. Accurate definition of all of the factors resulting in failure of the initial procedure is the first step in deciding on future treatment and improving the likelihood of a successful revision when such a procedure is indicated.

	Errors in Diagnosis

Top Introduction Errors in Diagnosis Errors in Operative Technique Postoperative Complications Persistent Defects of the... References

 
Physical examination and injection tests help to define the patient's current problems. Care must be taken to specifically identify referred pain due to thoracic outlet syndrome and lesions of the cervical spine. Pain secondary to cervical lesions often presents in a dermatomal pattern over the posterior and lateral aspects of the shoulder; the pain may radiate to the occiput and the thoracic spine. Tenderness to palpation and a decreased range of motion of the neck are indicative of cervical disc disease. Provocative maneuvers, such as the Spurling test for discogenic disease and the Wright⁵⁵ and Adson¹ tests for thoracic-outlet syndrome^24,26, may be helpful if the results are positive. The Spurling test is performed by passive lateral bending and ipsilateral rotation of the neck. A positive test reproduces radicular symptoms. With the Adson test, the arm is positioned in extension with ipsilateral rotation of the neck. With the Wright test, the arm is placed in extension and abduction. The Adson and Wright tests are positive when they reproduce the symptoms of the upper extremity and the hand. If selective injection of lidocaine into the subacromial space or the acromioclavicular joint, or both, relieves pain, the cervical spine may be eliminated from consideration.

Neuropathies of the suprascapular and axillary nerves also may mimic disease of the rotator cuff and cause misdiagnoses. The suprascapular nerve, a branch of the superior trunk of the brachial plexus, may be compressed beneath the suprascapular ligament in the suprascapular notch⁴³ or by a ganglion in the spinoglenoid notch³⁸. In addition, if a superior capsular release was performed during the original procedure, it is possible that dissection more than two centimeters medial to the superior aspect of the glenoid rim may result in iatrogenic injury to the suprascapular nerve.

Clinical presentation of these neuropathies usually consists of pain in the posterior aspect of the shoulder with accompanying muscle weakness specific to the site of nerve compression. Proximal compression at the suprascapular notch or iatrogenic injury at this level denervates both the supraspinatus and the infraspinatus, while more distal compression at the spinoglenoid notch causes selective weakness of the infraspinatus. Similarly, weakness of the deltoid and the teres minor secondary to postoperative neuropathy of the axillary nerve may have a presentation very similar to that of a tear of the rotator cuff. Electromyographic analysis can help to confirm these diagnoses^12,14,43. Magnetic resonance imaging is the only useful imaging modality for defining neuropathy of the suprascapular nerve as a cause of failed operative treatment of a tear of the rotator cuff. It may reveal space-occupying lesions such as a ganglion cyst, or it may show severe muscle atrophy without a defect of the cuff.

Arthropathy of the acromioclavicular joint also may complicate the clinical presentation of disorders of the rotator cuff and may lead to failures in diagnosis and treatment. Careful clinical examination of the acromioclavicular joint, including direct palpation for tenderness and cross-arm adduction maneuvers, should be performed routinely for patients who have a possible lesion of the cuff. Imaging studies may be useful for diagnosing residual abnormalities of the acromioclavicular joint, a common cause of persistent pain after operations on the rotator cuff. A Zanca radiograph (an anteroposterior radiograph made with the x-ray beam centered on the acromioclavicular joint with 15 degrees of cephalic angulation) shows the full extent of the joint and may reveal lesions that were missed on routine anteroposterior radiographs. If the radiographs do not show conclusive findings and a lesion of the acromioclavicular joint is strongly suspected, a bone scan may confirm the diagnosis and lead to appropriate treatment.

An unrecognized os acromiale may lead to persistent pain after subacromial decompression and repair of the rotator cuff. This lesion is most readily identified on routine axillary radiographs of the shoulder or on axial magnetic resonance images of the acromion. If small fragments are mobile and painful, they can be excised with reattachment of the deltoid to the remaining edge of the acromion. Larger lesions may necessitate excision of the intervening synchondrosis and fixation with a tension-band wire with use of local bone graft obtained from a simultaneous acromioplasty.

Lesions of the biceps tendon and the superior aspect of the glenoid labrum often are found in patients who have impingement syndrome and a tear of the rotator cuff³⁵. Failure to recognize and treat these problems appropriately may lead to a poor operative result. An arthroscopic mini-open repair offers the advantage of improved visualization of the biceps tendon and its attachment to the superior aspect of the labrum. A finding of tenderness of the biceps tendon to palpation on physical examination, and a positive result on the Speed or the Yergason⁵⁶ test, are suggestive of but non-specific for biceps tendinitis. The Yergason test is performed by resisting supination and flexion of the forearm. The Speed test is performed by resisting flexion of the elbow and the shoulder with the elbow in 90 degrees of flexion and the shoulder in approximately 30 degrees of flexion. Both tests are performed to evaluate referred pain to the long head of the biceps tendon. Standard radiographs are not particularly helpful for assessing the status of the biceps tendon. An axial radiograph of the intertubercular sulcus may provide indirect evidence of a lesion of the biceps tendon⁹. Arthroscopy is the most useful tool for delineating severe lesions of the biceps tendon. Tendon-fraying and labral detachments can be both assessed accurately and treated arthroscopically. These intra-articular structures may be difficult to visualize and treat during routine open repair of defects of the cuff that are less than two centimeters long. Additionally, arthroscopy can be helpful for distinguishing internal impingement of the posterosuperior aspect of the glenoid or secondary subtle instability of the glenohumeral joint^27,52, especially in athletes who have pain during the late cocking phase (marked external rotation and abduction) of throwing.

	Errors in Operative Technique

Top Introduction Errors in Diagnosis Errors in Operative Technique Postoperative Complications Persistent Defects of the... References

 
Errors in the operative technique of acromioplasty and repair of the rotator cuff can undermine the results of treatment of even the most accurately diagnosed lesions of the cuff. These errors include inadequate operations and intraoperative complications. Inadequate operations include those in which a lesion of the biceps tendon or the labrum, or both, is missed; those in which arthropathy of the acromioclavicular joint is missed, as discussed previously; and inadequate acromioplasty. Intraoperative complications include fracture of the acromion, detachment or denervation of the deltoid, and failure to preserve the coracoacromial arch in patients who have an irreparable tear of the cuff.

The principles of acromioplasty include removal of a sufficient amount of the bursa for adequate evaluation of the underlying rotator cuff and adequate removal of anteroinferior acromial bone without excessive shortening or narrowing of the acromion. Inadequate anterior acromioplasty has been reported by many investigators as a common source of failure necessitating a revision procedure^{4,5,10,17,20,40,45}.

In a study by Flugstad et al.¹⁷, fifteen of nineteen patients who had failure of operative treatment for impingement syndrome were found to have residual acromial spurs. Of 117 patients who had a failed acromioplasty in a study by Rockwood and Williams⁴⁵, all ninety who had recurrent symptoms of impingement had a residual anterior portion of the acromion at the time of the reoperation. DeOrio and Cofield¹⁰ also demonstrated the importance of dequate subacromial decompression in their study of failed repairs of the rotator cuff; more than 50 per cent of their twenty-seven patients had not had an acromioplasty during the first, unsuccessful operation.

Removal of an excessive amount of the anterior or lateral portion of the acromion may be associated with a fracture of the acromion or with detachment of the deltoid and a poor operative result²⁹. In the early development of techniques for repair of the rotator cuff, radical acromionectomy or subtotal lateral acromionectomy was advocated for subacromial decompression^2,51. More recently, however, it has become clear that the acromion serves a necessary function in providing a strong attachment point and fulcrum for the powerful deltoid muscle. In 1981, Neer and Marberry³⁴ reported on thirty patients who had had removal of 80 per cent of the acromion with resultant adhesions of the deltoid to the rotator cuff, retraction of the deltoid, and loss of the function of the acromion as a fulcrum. Attempted operative correction in twenty of these patients was unsuccessful. It is now accepted that acromionectomy is fraught with complications and should be abandoned^4,8,28,54.

Frank acromial fractures can occur either intraoperatively or postoperatively²⁹. Careful visualization and palpation of the thickness of the acromion is necessary to avoid this complication. Meticulous operative technique, with emphasis placed on the correct angle of progression of the osteotome and with great care taken not to lever on the acromion with a subacromial retractor, is mandatory. An intraoperative fracture should be identified readily at the time of the operation and should be corrected with open reduction and internal fixation to prevent a painful non-union and consequent weakness of the deltoid. Acromial fractures also have been reported after arthroscopic subacromial decompression²⁹ (Figs. 1-A and 1-B), emphasizing the need for excellent visualization of the undersurface of the acromion and careful control of removal of bone. Excessive use or trauma, or both, during the postoperative period also can cause an excessively thinned acromion to fracture.

View larger version (77K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1-A and 1-B: Postoperative fractures of the acromion (arrows).

Arthroscopic acromioplasty and mini-open repair of the rotator cuff theoretically should decrease the prevalence of detachment of the deltoid. To our knowledge, there have been no reported cases of detachment of the deltoid after mini-open or arthroscopic techniques. However, the senior one of us (J. P. I.) has seen such detachment after both arthroscopic mini-open repair of the cuff and arthroscopic acromioplasty alone. Therefore, it is possible for this complication to occur with both arthroscopic techniques.

Reattachment of the deltoid to the acromion after repair of a tear of the rotator cuff is crucial. If an inadequate soft-tissue cuff of fascia remains on the acromion, or if excessive detachment of the deltoid is necessary for repair of a massive tear, then the deltoid should be reattached to the osseous edge of the acromion and the clavicle (if necessary) through drill-holes. If the lateral portion of the clavicle has been resected, the deltoid must be repaired to the leading edge of the trapezius fascia. Improper reattachment may result in retraction of the deltoid and may substantially compromise the functional result. When poor-quality deltoid tissue is encountered, an extended period of protected mobilization of the shoulder may be necessary.

Examination of the shoulder of a patient who has detachment of the deltoid reveals a defect at the origin of the deltoid from the acromion and a prominence of the deltoid distal to the defect that is accentuated by active elevation of the arm (Fig. 2-A). A magnetic resonance image may be helpful for confirming this diagnosis (Fig. 2-B). Operative repair of a retracted deltoid should proceed as soon as possible. Prolonged retraction leads to scarring and subsequent stiffness, pain, and loss of shoulder function.

View larger version (109K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figs. 2-A and 2-B: Postoperative detachment of the deltoid. Fig. 2-A: Clinical photograph revealing a defect that is accentuated by attempted active elevation of the arm.

View larger version (147K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2-B: weighted magnetic resonance image demonstrating detachment and retraction of the origin of the deltoid (arrow).

Iatrogenic denervation of the deltoid is a serious complication of repair of the rotator cuff. Knowledge of the anatomy of the terminal branches of the axillary nerve as they relate to the splitting of the deltoid muscle is critical. The axillary nerve arises from the posterior cord of the brachial plexus near the coracoid process and then courses through the quadrilateral space to reach the posterior aspect of the shoulder. While in the quadrilateral space, it divides into posterior and anterior terminal branches, which supply the posterior one-third and the anterior two-thirds of the deltoid muscle, respectively. The anterior branch travels approximately five centimeters inferior to the lateral and anterior margin of the acromion, perpendicular to the direction of the muscle fibers. The split in the deltoid therefore should not extend beyond this distance. A stay suture can be placed at the apex of this split to prevent its propagation from excessive retraction of the deltoid. Furthermore, Burkhead et al.⁶ showed that, in some smaller patients, the nerve may be located slightly closer than five centimeters from the acromial margin.

Neuropathy of the axillary nerve initially presents as weakness in abduction and forward elevation of the shoulder. Chronic disorders are accompanied by atrophy of the deltoid. Loss of sensation in the dermatome overlying the lateral aspect of the deltoid is variable, as the cutaneous nerves supplying this area often arise from the posterior terminal branches of the axillary nerve.

Electromyography should be used when denervation of the deltoid is suspected postoperatively, both to confirm the diagnosis and to establish the nature of the injury as either a neurapraxia or a neurotmesis. Neurapraxias can be managed expectantly, with institution of passive range-of-motion exercises to prevent stiffness of the shoulder. Transections of the nerve should be evaluated for recovery on a monthly basis; nerve repair can be considered if no improvement is evident by three to four months and if it is warranted by the degree of the functional impairment. However, these recommendations are based on results obtained after repair of injuries of the axillary nerve secondary to dislocation of the shoulder or operations for anterior stabilization in which the nerve was injured at its larger, main-branch region⁴². There is little information in the literature with regard to the treatment of lesions of the terminal branch after repair of the cuff. Leffert²⁵ described rotational deltoidplasty with excision of the denervated portion of the muscle as a valuable alternative to nerve repair for this problem.

The importance of the coracoacromial arch in providing anterosuperior stability for the humeral head has been the subject of several recent investigations^23,31. Lazarus et al.²³ demonstrated anterosuperior escape of the humeral head from beneath the coracoacromial arch in five of six cadaver shoulders after release of the coracoacromial ligament and anterior acromioplasty. In a more elaborate cadaver model, Flatow et al.¹⁶ demonstrated that this superior migration is most severe in the presence of large tears of the rotator cuff, especially when the edges of the tear approach the equator of the humeral head. Repair of the tears of the rotator cuff restored nearly normal glenohumeral kinematics in their patients. Failure to recognize the role of the coracoacromial arch in shoulders with a tear of the rotator cuff may lead to clinically evident anterosuperior instability (Figs. 3-A and 3-B). In an attempt to circumvent this problem, Flatow et al.¹⁵ recently described a technique of limited subacromial decompression and reattachment of the coracoacromial ligament in patients who had a massive irreparable tear of the rotator cuff.

View larger version (85K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3-A: Photograph showing insufficiency of the coracoacromial arch.

View larger version (159K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3-B: Photograph showing attempted elevation of the shoulder resulting in superior migration of the humeral head.

	Postoperative Complications

Top Introduction Errors in Diagnosis Errors in Operative Technique Postoperative Complications Persistent Defects of the... References

 
Complications of repair of the rotator cuff include infection, heterotopic ossification, frozen shoulder, and recurrent tearing. Since these complications can be related both to the operative technique and to the postoperative rehabilitation, they will be discussed separately in this section.

Postoperative infections may be difficult to diagnose, as they often present in a delayed and unimpressive fashion. Superficial wound infections are characterized by erythema with or without drainage, induration, warmth, and fever. These findings may be subtle initially and may be overlooked as normal postoperative inflammation. Laboratory and imaging studies are often unrevealing at this stage. If left to worsen, these infections eventually will manifest themselves as wound dehiscence, drainage, cellulitis, and lymphadenopathy. Treatment is most successful if begun early and based on positive cultures. A heightened awareness of this potential problem is critical, and aspiration of the joint or the wound should not be delayed in suspicious cases. Intravenous administration of antistaphylococcal and antistreptococcal antibiotics (first-generation cephalosporin) should be initiated after operative débridement and exploration of the extent of the infection. If the infection does not pass deep to an intact repair of the cuff, then the repair can be left intact if this allows for adequate débridement of necrotic tissue. If the infection extends into the shoulder joint, then it should be debrided arthroscopically. The subacromial space and the biceps tendon sheath should be debrided in an open fashion. Non-absorbable suture and any metallic suture anchors should be removed. Closed suction drains should be left in place, and antibiotics should be given intravenously as dictated by the results of gram stains and specimens of intraoperative cultures.

Heterotopic ossification is uncommon after acromioplasty and repair of the rotator cuff. It occurs in approximately 3 to 5 per cent of patients, in our experience, but not all of these patients are symptomatic. Copious irrigation to remove all bone fragments after acromioplasty reduces the chance of heterotopic bone formation. When ossification occurs in the subacromial space or in the space created by resection of the lateral portion of the clavicle, it can be a source of pain (Figs. 4-A and 4-B). The diagnosis is best made with use of routine radiographs. Lesions that cause severe pain or that limit motion can be treated with excision. Preoperative bone scans help to delineate mature lesions when they do not display markedly increased uptake of radioisotope. In our center, low-dose irradiation (700 centigray in a single dose) given within the first forty-eight hours after resection, or Indocin (indomethacin) given orally for six weeks, has been successful in preventing recurrence. This regimen is based on its effectiveness in patients who have had a total hip arthroplasty; we are unaware of any scientific data that support its use specifically for heterotopic ossification of the shoulder.

View larger version (127K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4-A and 4-B: Postoperative radiographs showing heterotopic ossification. Fig. 4-A: Axillary radiograph demonstrating heterotopic bone in the vicinity of an anterior acromioplasty.

View larger version (133K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4-B: Zanca (acromioclavicular joint) radiograph demonstrating heterotopic bone formation in the space created by resection of the lateral portion of the clavicle.

More recently, Mormino et al.³² reported on thirteen patients who had subdeltoid adhesions after repair of the rotator cuff. These patients had arthroscopic release of the adhesions, which was universally successful in alleviating pain. The average score according to the system of the University of California at Los Angeles increased from 14.8 to 30.1 points. These authors postulated that the adhesions acted as a functional tenodesis, thus altering the normal biomechanics of the shoulder by preventing rolling of the humeral head on the glenoid. This restriction of motion is distinct from that secondary to capsular contracture or to scarring in the classic frozen shoulder and has been termed the captured shoulder. Early mobilization of the shoulder postoperatively may reduce the prevalence of this complication. However, all of the patients in the series of Mormino et al. began therapy on the first postoperative day. These authors did not explore factors that may have been associated with the development of the adhesions.

	Persistent Defects of the Rotator Cuff

Top Introduction Errors in Diagnosis Errors in Operative Technique Postoperative Complications Persistent Defects of the... References

 
Persistent defects of previously repaired rotator cuff tendons may be related to an inadequate initial repair of the cuff, poor-quality tendon or bone, persistent impingement, or improper physical therapy. The results of clinical evaluation and radiographs must be evaluated concomitantly in order to determine the presence of a persistent defect as well as its relative clinical importance.

Persistent impingement usually is related to inadequate acromioplasty. Inadequate repair of the original tear may be secondary to improper identification of thickened, hypertrophic subacromial bursal tissue as rotator cuff tendon or to inadequate mobilization of the torn tendons with consequent tension on the site of the repair. Bigliani et al.⁴ identified the cause of eleven of thirty-one failed repairs as secondary to inadequate mobilization. Observation of the ease with which the bursal tissue pulls away from the underlying rotator cuff, as well as the differential motion of the bursa as compared with that of the rotator cuff with rotation of the humeral head, should serve as guides with which to determine the proper tissue to repair.

Overly intensive physical therapy during the early postoperative period may lead to avulsion of the tendon before healing. This mechanism was associated with five of the thirty-one failures in the series of Bigliani et al.⁴. In addition, Neviaser and Neviaser³⁷ found that early use of weights was a factor leading to failure of repair of rotator cuff tears. Rehabilitation must be tailored individually to intraoperative observations of the repair in each patient. A small tear that is repaired without detachment of the deltoid will withstand more intensive therapy than will a large or massive tear necessitating takedown and repair of the deltoid origin. Intraoperative assessment of the quality of the tissue and the amount of tension on the site of the repair also will help to guide therapy.

The identification of persistent defects of the cuff with use of imaging modalities can be difficult. The most useful study in the postoperative setting is arthrography. Communication of contrast medium between the subacromial and glenohumeral joint spaces was reported to be 100 per cent sensitive and 96 per cent specific for the diagnosis of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff in series ranging from twenty to 805 shoulders^7,30,53. Ultrasonography also has been used successfully to delineate full-thickness defects in the shoulder postoperatively. Accurate interpretation of sonographic images requires an extremely experienced sonographer who has the frequent opportunity to correlate the readings with the intraoperative findings. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of postoperative tears of the cuff approached 95 per cent over-all, and failure to visualize a supraspinatus musculotendinous unit was virtually 100 per cent predictive of a complete tear, in series of fifty¹³ and seventy-two³⁹ patients. Unlike preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans, postoperative scans do not delineate partial tears of the rotator cuff accurately. Persistent full-thickness tears can be assessed accurately when there is a well defined defect in the tendon that displays high signal intensity on T2-weighted images (Fig. 5).

View larger version (183K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5: T2-weighted magnetic resonance image, made in the coronal plane, of a recurrent defect of the rotator cuff. There is a full-thickness, high-signal-intensity defect in the supraspinatus tendon (large arrow). Note the bone trough and the suture through the bone tunnel (small arrow).

DePalma et al.¹¹, in their classic study of 108 cadavera, determined the prevalence of defects of the rotator cuff relative to aging. Although no specimens from individuals who had died before the fifth decade of life had a tear of the rotator cuff, 33 per cent from those who had died in the fifth decade and 100 per cent from those who had died in the seventh decade had a complete tear. Forty-four of these specimens were obtained during autopsies on patients for whom the history and the findings on physical examination had been negative for a lesion of the rotator cuff.

Calvert et al.⁷ used arthrography to study twenty shoulders after repair of the rotator cuff. They found that eighteen of the shoulders had a persistent defect and that seventeen of the eighteen had satisfactory relief of the preoperative pain. Harryman et al.¹⁹, in a larger, more detailed study, performed bilateral ultrasonography on 122 patients after repair of the cuff. Of 105 patients who had a postoperative defect of the cuff, ninety-four were satisfied with the decrease in pain. Persistent defects were related to a decreased range of motion of the shoulder and to an inability to perform activities of daily living. Additionally, the subjective results associated with intact repairs of recurrent tears were as successful as those associated with intact repairs of primary tears. The size of the tear was not related to the subjective assessment of function or pain relief at the latest follow-up evaluation if the repair had remained intact. However, a repair of a large defect is less likely to heal than is a small tear.

These results are not surprising, given the recent reports in the literature concerning the results of imaging of asymptomatic shoulders. With use of ultrasonography of the contralateral, asymptomatic shoulder of seventy-three patients who had a unilateral tear, Harryman et al.¹⁹ noted a defect of the rotator cuff in forty (55 per cent). Sher et al.⁴⁹ performed magnetic resonance imaging on ninety-six asymptomatic shoulders and found an over-all prevalence of full-thickness and partial-thickness tears of 15 and 20 per cent. All but one full-thickness defect was in a patient who was more than sixty years old.

Finally, the clinical importance of postoperative defects of the cuff must be interpreted in light of the evidence that acromioplasty and partial débridement or partial repair of a portion of the cuff is successful for the treatment of some large degenerative tears. Rockwood et al.^44,46 showed that this technique, coupled with intensive postoperative rehabilitation, can provide relief of pain and adequate function. Selection of the patients is critical, as the best results have been in patients who have had preoperative forward elevation of the shoulder above the horizontal plane, an intact long head of the biceps, and excellent function of the deltoid^44,46 (Figs. 6-A and 6-B). Less favorable results have been noted in patients who have had a previous operation, anterior deltoid dysfunction, or a tear of the biceps tendon^44,46. Although detachment of the cuff can provide favorable results in selected patients, we recommend repair of the cuff whenever possible.

View larger version (112K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figs. 6-A and 6-B: Photographs of a patient who had an excellent result two years after débridement of a massive tear of the rotator cuff. Fig. 6-A: The range of motion is excellent.

View larger version (123K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6-B: There is marked atrophy of the infraspinatus (arrow).

In conclusion, there are many potential causes of failure of rotator cuff repair. The categories of incomplete and incorrect diagnosis, errors of operative technique or postoperative rehabilitation, and postoperative complications are convenient for classification, but it must be remembered that there may be several causes of failure in any given patient. Clinical evaluation is most dependent on a careful history, a review of the medical record and the preoperative imaging studies, and a physical examination with use of injection tests as indicated. On the basis of this evaluation, a definitive diagnosis or a limited differential diagnosis often can be established. The selective use of additional imaging studies and diagnostic arthroscopy will define the anatomical abnormalities. These lesions must be correlated carefully with the clinical findings in order to determine their relative importance and to choose the appropriate treatment.

	Footnotes

 

*Printed with permission of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. This article will appear in Instructional Course Lectures, Volume 47, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Illinois, March 1998.

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

Shoulder and Elbow Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, PENN Musculoskeletal Institute, 39th and Market Street, Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.

	References

Top Introduction Errors in Diagnosis Errors in Operative Technique Postoperative Complications Persistent Defects of the... References

 

1. Adson, A. W.: Surgical treatment for symptoms produced by cervical ribs and the scalenus anticus muscle. Surg., Gynec. and Obstet., 85: 687-700, 1947.

2. Armstrong, J. R.: Excision of the acromion in treatment of the supraspinatus syndrome. Report of ninety-five excisions. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 31-B(3): 436-442, 1949.[Free Full Text]

3. Bigliani, L. U., and Rodosky, M. W.: Techniques of repair of large rotator cuff tears. Tech. Orthop., 9: 133-140, 1994.

4. Bigliani, L. U.; Cordasco, F. A.; McIlveen, S. J.; and Musso, E. S.: Operative treatment of failed repairs of the rotator cuff. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 74-A: 1505-1515, Dec. 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Bigliani, L. U.; McIlveen, S. J.; Cordasco, F. A.; and Musso, E. S.: Operative management of failed rotator cuff repairs. Orthop. Trans., 12: 674, 1988.

6. Burkhead, W. Z.; Schienberg, R. R.; and Box, G.: Surgical anatomy of the axillary nerve. J. Shoulder and Elbow Surg., 1: 31-36, 1992.

7. Calvert, P. T.; Packer, N. P.; Stoker, D. J.; Bayley, J. I. L.; and Kessel, L.: Arthrography of the shoulder after operative repair of the torn rotator cuff. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 68-B(1): 147-150, 1986.

8. Cofield, R. H.: Current concepts review. Rotator cuff disease of the shoulder. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 67-A: 974-979, July 1985.[Free Full Text]

9. Cone, R. O.; Danzig, L.; Resnick, D.; and Goldman, A. B.: The bicipital groove: radiographic, anatomic, and pathologic study. AJR: Am. J. Roentgenol., 141: 781-788, 1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. DeOrio, J. K., and Cofield, R. H.: Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 66-A: 563-567, April 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. DePalma, A. F.; Gallery, G.; and Bennett, G. A.: Variational anatomy in degenerative lesions of the shoulder joint. In Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Vol. 6, pp. 255-281. Ann Arbor, J. W. Edwards, 1949.

12. Donovan, W. H.,, and Kraft, G. H.: Rotator cuff tear versus suprascapular nerve injury: a problem in differential diagnosis. Arch. Phys. Med. and Rehab., 55: 424-428, 1974.[Medline]

13. Drakeford, M. K.; Quinn, M. J.; Simpson, S. C.; Simpson, S. L.; and Pettine, K. A.: A comparative study of ultrasonography and arthrography in evaluation of the rotator cuff. Clin. Orthop., 253: 118-122, 1990.

14. Drez, D., Jr.: Suprascapular neuropathy in the differential diagnosis of rotator cuff injuries. Am. J. Sports Med., 4: 43-45, 1976.[Free Full Text]

15. Flatow, E. L.; Pollock, R. G.; and Bigliani, L. U.: Coracoacromial ligament preservation in rotator cuff surgery. Tech. Orthop., 9: 133-140, 1994.

16. Flatow, E. L.; Raimondo, R. A.; Kelkar, R.; Wang, V. M.; Pollock, R. G.; Pawluk, R. J.; Mow, V. C.; and Bigliani, L. U.: Active and passive restraints against superior humeral translation: the contribution of the rotator cuff, the biceps tendon and the coracoacromial arch. Orthop. Trans., 20: 121, 1996.

17. Flugstad, D.; Matsen, F. A.; Larry, I.; and Jackins, S. E.: Failed acromioplasty—etiology and prevention. Orthop. Trans., 10: 229, 1986.

18. Hammond, G.: Follow-up notes on articles previously published in The Journal. Complete acromionectomy in the treatment of chronic tendinitis of the shoulder. A follow-up of ninety operations on eighty-seven patients. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 53-A: 173-180, Jan. 1971.[Free Full Text]

19. Harryman, D. T., II; Mack, L. A.; Wang, K. Y.; Jackins, S. E.; Richardson, M. L.; and Matsen, F. A., III: Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 73-A: 982-989, Aug. 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Hawkins, R. J.; Chris, A. D.; and Kiefer, G. N.: Failed anterior acromioplasties. Orthop. Trans., 11: 233, 1987.

21. Hawkins, R. J.; Misamore, G. W.; and Hobeika, P. E.: Surgery for full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 67-A: 1349-1355, Dec. 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Iannotti, J. P.: Full-thickness rotator cuff tears: factors affecting surgical outcome. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surgeons, 2: 87-95, 1994.[Abstract]

23. Lazarus, M. D.; Yung, S. W.; Sidles, J. A.; and Harryman, D. T.: Anterosuperior humeral displacement: limitation by the coracoacromial arch.. J. Shoulder and Elbow Surg., 5 (Supplement):: 7, 1996.

24. Leffert, R. D.: Thoracic outlet syndrome—orthopaedic perspective on diagnosis and treatment. Orthop. Trans., 12: 190, 1988.

25. Leffert, R. D.: Neurological problems. In The Shoulder, edited by C. A. Rockwood, Jr., and F. A. Matsen, III. Vol. 2, pp. 750-773. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1990.

26. Leffert, R. D.: Thoracic outlet syndrome. In Operative Nerve Repair and Reconstruction, pp. 1177-1195. Edited by R. H. Gelberman. Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott, 1991.

27. Lombardo, S. J.; Jobe, F. W.; Kerlan, R. K.; Carter, V. S.; and Shields, C. L., Jr.: Posterior shoulder lesions in throwing athletes. Am. J. Sports Med., 5: 106-110, 1977.[Free Full Text]

28. McLaughlin, H. L.: Lesions of the musculotendinous cuff of the shoulder. I. The exposure and treatment of tears with retraction. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 26: 31-51, Jan. 1944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Matthews, L. S.; Burkhead, W. Z.; Gordon, S.; Racanelli, J.; and Rulard, L: Acromial fracture complicating arthroscopic subacromial decompression. J. Shoulder and Elbow Surg., 3: 256-261, 1994.

30. Mink, J. H.; Harris, E.; and Rappaport, M.: Rotator cuff tears: evaluation using double contrast shoulder arthrography. Radiology, 157: 621-623, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Moorman, C. T., III; Deng, S. H.; Warren, R. F.; Torzilli, P. A.; and Wickiewicz, T. L.: The coracoacromial ligment: is it the appendix of the shoulder?. J. Shoulder and Elbow Surg., 5 (Supplement): 9, 1996.

32. Mormino, M. A.; Gross, R. M.; and McCarthy, J. A.: Captured shoulder: a complication of rotator cuff surgery. Arthroscopy, 12: 457-461, 1996.[Medline]

33. Neer, C. S., II: Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder. A preliminary report. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 54-A: 41-50, Jan. 1972.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Neer, C. S., II, and Marberry, T. A.: On the disadvantages of radical acromionectomy. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 63-A: 416-419, March 1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Neer, C. S., II; Bigliani, L. U.; and Hawkins, R. J.: Rupture of the long head of the biceps related to subacromial impingement. Orthop. Trans., 1: 111, 1977.

36. Neer, C. S., II; Flatow, E. L.; and Lech, O.: Tears of the rotator cuff. Long term results of anterior acromioplasty and repair. Orthop. Trans., 12: 735, 1988.

37. Neviaser, R. J., and Neviaser, T. J.: Reoperation for failed rotator cuff repair: analysis of 46 cases. Orthop. Trans., 13: 509, 1989.

38. Neviaser, T. J.; Ain, B. R.; and Neviaser, R. J.: Suprascapular nerve degeneration secondary to attenuation by a ganglionic cyst. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 68-A: 627-628, April 1986.[Free Full Text]

39. Olive, R. J., Jr., and Marsh, H. O.: Ultrasonography of rotator cuff tears. Clin. Orthop., 282: 110-113, 1992.

40. Packer, N. P.; Calvert, P. T.; Bayley, J. I.L.; and Kessel, L.: Operative treatment of chronic ruptures of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 65-B(2): 171-175, 1983.

41. Petersson, C.: Long-term results of rotator cuff repair. In Shoulder Surgery, pp. 64-69. Edited by I. Bayley and L. Kessel. New York, Springer, 1982.

42. Petrucci, F. S.; Morelli, A.; and Raimondi, P. L.: Axillary nerve injuries—21 cases treated by nerve graft and neurolysis. J. Hand Surg., 7: 271-278, 1982.[Medline]

43. Rengachary, S. S.; Burr, D.; Lucas, S.; and Brackett, C. E.: Suprascapular entrapment neuropathy: a clinical, anatomical, and comparative study. Neurosurgery, 5: 441-455, 1979.[Medline]

44. Rockwood, C. A., Jr.: The management of patients with massive rotator cuff defects by acromioplasty and rotator cuff debridement. Orthop. Trans, 10: 622, 1986.

45. Rockwood, C. A., Jr., and Williams, G. R.: The shoulder impingement syndrome: management of surgical treatment failures. Orthop. Trans., 16: 739-740, 1993.

46. Rockwood, C. A., Jr.; Williams, G. R., Jr.; and Burkhead, W. Z., Jr.: Débridement of degenerative, irreparable lesions of the rotator cuff. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 77-A: 857-866, June 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Sahlstrand, T.: Operations for impingement of the shoulder: early results in 52 patients. Acta Orthop. Scandinavica, 60: 45-48, 1989.[Medline]

48. Samilson, R. L., and Binder, W. F.: Symptomatic full thickness tears of the rotator cuff: an analysis of 292 shoulders in 276 patients. Orthop. Clin. North America, 6: 449-466, 1975.[Medline]

49. Sher, J. S.; Uribe, J. W.; Posada, A.; Murphy, B. J.; and Zlatkin, M. B.: Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 77-A: 10-15, Jan. 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Sher, J. S.; Warner, J. P.; Groff, Y.;Williams, G.; and Iannotti, J. P.: Treatment of postoperative deltoid origin disruption. Read at the Open Meeting of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Atlanta, Georgia, Feb. 25, 1996.

51. Smith-Peterson, M. N.; Aufranc, O. E.; and Larson, C. B.: Useful surgical procedures for rheumatoid arthritis involving joints of the upper extremity. Arch. Surg., 46: 764-770, 1943.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

52. Snyder, S. J.; Karzel, R. P.; Del Pizzo, W.; Ferkel, R. D.; and Friedman, M. J.: SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy, 6: 274-279, 1990.[Medline]

53. Stiles, R. G., and Otte, M. T.: Imaging of the shoulder. Radiology, 188: 603-613, 1993.[Free Full Text]

54. Wolfgang, G. L.: Surgical repair of tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. Factors influencing the result. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 56-A: 14-26, Jan. 1974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

55. Wright, I. S.: The neurovascular syndrome produced by hyperabduction of the arms: the immediate changes produced in 150 normal controls, and the effects on some persons of prolonged hyperabduction of the arms, as in sleeping, and in certain occupations. Am. Heart J., 29: 1-19, 1945.

56. Yergason, R. M.: Supination sign. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 13: 160, Jan. 1931.[Free Full Text]

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Facebook

Technorati

Twitter

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. V. R. Mohana-Borges, C. B. Chung, and D. Resnick MR Imaging and MR Arthrography of the Postoperative Shoulder: Spectrum of Normal and Abnormal Findings RadioGraphics, January 1, 2004; 24(1): 69 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Extract Full Text (PDF) Free Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Rights and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by KARAS, E. H. Articles by IANNOTTI, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by KARAS, E. H. Articles by IANNOTTI, J. P. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 1997 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.