This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KANN, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by STERN, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by KANN, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by STERN, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 78:1114-28 (1996)
© 1996 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Instructional Course Lecture

Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Simulators of Hand Infections*{dagger}

STEVEN E. KANN, M.D.{ddagger}, JOHN B. JACQUEMIN, M.D.{ddagger} and PETER J. STERN, M.D.{ddagger}, CINCINNATI, OHIO

An Instructional Course Lecture, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons


    Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Bites of the Brown...
 Pyogenic Granuloma
 Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Metastatic Lesions of the...
 Foreign-Body Reaction
 Factitious Diseases
 Gout
 Pseudogout
 Rheumatoid Arthritis
 References
 
Inappropriate treatment of pathological processes that mimic infection can have catastrophic consequences. Prompt recognition may prevent unnecessary operative intervention and permit appropriate therapy. The purpose of this lecture is to acquaint the physician with infection simulators, to demonstrate how they can be confused with infection, and to give guidelines for treatment.


    Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Top
 Introduction
 Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Bites of the Brown...
 Pyogenic Granuloma
 Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Metastatic Lesions of the...
 Foreign-Body Reaction
 Factitious Diseases
 Gout
 Pseudogout
 Rheumatoid Arthritis
 References
 
Acute calcific tendinitis may involve the hand and wrist as well as the shoulder, elbow, hip, or knee. Cohen, in 1924, was the first to describe calcium deposition in the hands and extremities22. The condition may be confused with infection because of the acute onset of symptoms; subtle radiographic findings; and physical findings of erythema, edema, severe pain, and occasionally fever18,30,57,102,140,143,165.

In the hand and wrist, the condition most commonly presents during middle age, with a slight preponderance in women19,165. Two cases in children have been reported19,97. The etiology is unknown, but it has been theorized that a focal area of tissue necrosis caused by trauma or disease in conjunction with an alkaline environment permits calcium salts to precipitate19. The calcium deposits usually occur in or adjacent to ligaments and tendons19,30,102.

The onset of symptoms is acute, with severe pain that is well localized over the tendon or ligament that contains the calcium deposit. The entire hand and wrist may be erythematous and swollen, with the specific region of the calcium deposit demonstrating point tenderness. The erythema and edema may extend proximally, mimicking cellulitis or lymphangitis, but there is no accompanying lymphadenopathy. The pain is often severe and is aggravated by both active and passive motion114,115. There are no accompanying abnormalities in laboratory values, and the condition can be associated with a febrile response19,56. Because the calcium deposits may be small and difficult to identify radiographically, it is important that radiographs be made centered on the region of maximum tenderness and in multiple projections to maximize visualization of the deposit. By region, the calcific deposits tend to be found in the ligaments of the phalanges, the intrinsic muscles of the palm, and the extensor or flexor tendons of the wrist. The most common site affected is the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon19,20,102 near its insertion into the pisiform. In this location, the calcific deposit may be very small and easily overlooked on radiographs. A special radiographic view, made with the forearm in mid-supination, throws the pisiform into relief and demonstrates even a very small calcium deposit115 (Fig. 1). There is no relationship between the size of the calcium deposit and the magnitude of the pain, erythema, or swelling. The radiographic finding of a dense, amorphous, well circumscribed soft-tissue calcification confirms the diagnosis19.



View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Radiograph of a hand with calcific tendinitis of the flexor carpi ulnaris. The calcific deposit (arrow) where the flexor carpi ulnaris inserts into the pisiform is best visualized on the oblique radiograph.

 
Calcific tendinitis is a self-limited condition that resolves with or without treatment. Carroll et al. noted that the symptoms subsided in about three weeks without treatment19. However, there are reports in the literature of earlier resolution of the symptoms with intervention. With simple splinting, the time until relief of the symptoms was decreased to an average of nine days, and relief was obtained in an average of six days with injection of 1 per cent procainamide57,102. Dilley and Tonkin found that relief occurred in an average of seven or eight days with the use of splints and anti-inflammatory medication30. The symptomatic relief obtained from an injection of procainamide is the result of the release of tension within the deposit and the dissemination and absorption of the calcium salts115. The addition of a corticosteroid to the local anesthetic does not appear to enhance the efficacy of the injection19,115. Of note, radiographic evidence of resolution lags behind clinical resolution of the symptoms by several weeks.

If the deposit is unusually large, then aspiration of the calcium salts may be performed. In rare cases in which the symptoms have been present for more than a month and the calcification appears very dense radiographically, an injection is not likely to be effective. In this situation, operative excision should be considered, and complete resolution of the symptoms can be anticipated within twenty-four to forty-eight hours19. Recurrence of the calcific tendinitis after resolution has occasionally been reported19,30,97,102,165.


    Bites of the Brown Recluse Spider (Loxoscelism)
 Top
 Introduction
 Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Bites of the Brown...
 Pyogenic Granuloma
 Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Metastatic Lesions of the...
 Foreign-Body Reaction
 Factitious Diseases
 Gout
 Pseudogout
 Rheumatoid Arthritis
 References
 
The brown recluse spider, which at one time was indigenous to Central and South America, can now be found in all fifty United States. Most reported bites, however, occur in the southern and midwestern states. The local and systemic manifestations of the bite are variable, which complicates treatment.

This spider is able to live in a variety of conditions. It can tolerate extreme ranges in temperature, needs little food over extended periods, and can live inside or outside but prefers a dark, secluded habitat132,166. It is approximately 0.5 to two inches (one to five centimeters) in length, and it can be identified by a violin-shaped mark on its cephalothorax and by six eyes in three pairs as opposed to eight eyes, as are found in most spiders166.

In a classic bite scenario, the spider is living in clothing, bed sheets, or blankets that have been stored in a dark place and often bites when the victim is putting on clothes or rolling over in bed. The bite is perceived as a sharp sting or may go unnoticed. The spider often escapes, and the diagnosis is based solely on the history and the physical findings. The local reaction produces an urticarial rash that may progress to full-thickness skin necrosis132. The magnitude of tissue injury depends on the amount of venom injected and on the patient's immune status132. After several hours, a small hemorrhagic or erythematous blister develops that may be surrounded by a halo of ischemia. The erythema may spread rapidly and progress to a violaceous color. Snyder and Leonard stated: "A non healing ulcer with red, white, and blue phenomenon (erythema, ischemia, and cyanosis) is pathognomonic of a brown recluse spider bite."149 During a period of twenty-four to forty-eight hours, the affected area may expand, resulting in full-thickness skin loss in an area as large as thirty centimeters in diameter43 (Figs. 2-A and 2-B). If left untreated, the lesion forms an eschar, followed by ulceration in approximately fourteen days. Depending on its severity and size, the lesion can take weeks or months to heal.



View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figs. 2-A and 2-B: Photographs of a hand that was bitten by a brown recluse spider. Fig. 2-A: Approximately two days after the bite, there was epidermolysis and a halo of erythema.

 


View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2-B Ultimately, there was full-thickness skin necrosis that necessitated debridement and skin-grafting.

 
Systemic reactions to the venom have also been reported and range from nausea, vomiting, fever, chills, and arthralgia to disseminated intravascular coagulation, convulsions, and massive hemolysis leading to renal failure and death34,162.

The over-all approach to the treatment of loxoscelism is directed at three areas. First, the symptoms must be treated with antipyretics, sedatives, analgesics, and antipruritics. The second area of concern is the local wound. Treatment options include antihistamines, antibiotics, vasodilators, steroids (applied locally or systemically), operative excision, antivenin, hyperbaric oxygen, and oral administration of dapsone6,9,39,72,77,126. Unfortunately, there have been few prospective evaluations of these therapies in animals or humans125,126. The literature indicates that corticosteroids and early operative excision are not consistently beneficial, and early operative excision may be followed by delayed wound-healing and the formation of an abscess and scar72,125,166. Rees et al., in a prospective study of humans, demonstrated that treatment with dapsone and antibiotics reduced the prevalence of secondary infections as well as the need for operative intervention125. When an operation is necessary, it should be delayed until a mature eschar has formed and there is a need for skin-grafting. Dapsone should be used with caution; it has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for this application and, in rare instances, can cause hemolysis and agranulocytosis.

The treatment of the systemic symptoms and signs is supportive. All patients should have a baseline complete blood-cell count and urinalysis. Patients who have any systemic signs should be managed intensively with supportive therapy (intravenous administration of fluids and continuous monitoring of hemoglobin, renal electrolytes, platelet count, and coagulation factors) on an inpatient basis.

In conclusion, despite the variability in presentation and outcome associated with loxoscelism, close observation and treatment should be initiated to decrease the possibility of substantial local and systemic morbidity and, in rare circumstances, death.


    Pyogenic Granuloma
 Top
 Introduction
 Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Bites of the Brown...
 Pyogenic Granuloma
 Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Metastatic Lesions of the...
 Foreign-Body Reaction
 Factitious Diseases
 Gout
 Pseudogout
 Rheumatoid Arthritis
 References
 
The cause of pyogenic granuloma remains obscure. Its name is a misnomer, as it is not primarily a true infection. Many authors have thought that it is caused by chronic or repetitive irritation or trauma, with subsequent infection resulting in a proliferative, vascular response to an infectious organism of low virulence94,161. However, other authors have believed that, because of the histological findings and the absence of trauma or irritation in some patients, it is an acquired vascular lesion, possibly with secondary infection. It has a strong association with pregnancy and the use of oral contraceptives. These lesions are found primarily in the oral mucosa, but they have been seen in the hand94. Clinically, pyogenic granuloma must be differentiated from melanoma, particularly amelanotic melanoma. The primary and secondary small lesions may spread and can confuse the diagnosis94. The lesion has also been described in two case reports as an intravenous pyogenic granuloma of the hand23,29.

Grossly, the lesion is raised, red, and friable. On the hand, it is a papular lesion that bleeds easily and is usually found on the volar surface of the palm or digits (Fig. 3). Histological examination demonstrates both granulation tissue and inflammatory cells. The lesions range from one millimeter to one centimeter in diameter. They may develop spontaneously or follow an untreated laceration. There is an initial period of rapid growth, which may be alarming and may lead to suspicion of a cutaneous malignant tumor.



View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Photograph of a pyogenic granuloma. The lesion developed following a laceration that was not closed operatively. It was excised, and the skin edges were approximated. It did not recur.

 
There are numerous methods of treatment, including radiation, cauterization with silver nitrate, electrocautery, laser therapy, curettage, tangential removal, and operative excision performed with or without a wide margin48,109,110,118,161. All of these approaches may be followed by recurrence4,38,141,159.

We recommend application of silver nitrate once or twice daily for ten days for the treatment of small lesions (less than 0.5 centimeter in diameter). For those that do not respond or for larger lesions, operative excision with use of magnification, removal of a small cuff of normal tissue, and meticulous hemostasis is effective. Treatment with antibiotics is usually unnecessary.

In the rare case of a pyogenic granuloma occurring on the hand during pregnancy or with the use of oral contraceptives, it is advisable to wait until the pregnancy is completed or for the patient to abstain from the use of the contraceptives for four to eight weeks. Any source of irritation, such as a ring, should be removed. Most lesions resolve spontaneously without operative intervention. In the event that the lesion is large or that a pregnant patient requests an excision, curettage or limited excision will suffice. Recurrence is uncommon94.


    Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Top
 Introduction
 Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Bites of the Brown...
 Pyogenic Granuloma
 Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Metastatic Lesions of the...
 Foreign-Body Reaction
 Factitious Diseases
 Gout
 Pseudogout
 Rheumatoid Arthritis
 References
 
Pyoderma gangrenosum is a rare, destructive, cutaneous lesion that presents as a painful, rapidly enlarging ulcer17,68,112,138. It was first described by Brunstig et al.15, in 1930, and its etiology remains unclear. It is thought to be caused by a deficiency in the host immune system, and 80 per cent of patients who have pyoderma gangrenosum have a coexisting systemic disease122, most commonly ulcerative colitis. Fifty per cent of patients who have pyoderma gangrenosum have ulcerative colitis, but only 5 per cent of patients who have ulcerative colitis have pyoderma gangrenosum138. Other associated diseases include Crohn disease, chronic active hepatitis, a carcinoid, diverticulosis, a myeloproliferative disorder, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, iron-deficiency anemia, and polyarteritis nodosa17,68,112,138,144. However, 10 to 20 per cent of patients who have pyoderma gangrenosum have no evidence of systemic disease112,150,164,167. The differential diagnosis includes erythema multiforme, necrotizing vasculitis, Sweet syndrome, bacterial pyoderma, blastomycosis, brown recluse spider bite, and necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum167.

The lesions begin as red or black papules that arise acutely and are very painful. The lesion may also be associated with a fever. Within hours, pustules develop, spread rapidly, and undergo central necrosis (Fig. 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C). The border, which is irregular, raised, and violaceous, advances centrifugally at a rate of one to two centimeters a day.



View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figs. 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C: Photographs of pyoderma gangrenosum of the hand in a patient who had ulcerative colitis. (Courtesy of John D. Wyrick, M.D.) Fig. 4-A: Hemorrhagic blisters had been present for three days.

 


View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4-B Dorsal and palmar photographs, made at ten days, revealed progression to digital necrosis. The patient died as a result of complications of the ulcerative colitis.

 


View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4-C Dorsal and palmar photographs, made at ten days, revealed progression to digital necrosis. The patient died as a result of complications of the ulcerative colitis.

 
The lesion is surrounded by an erythematous halo. In the initial stage, it is virtually indistinguishable from a pyogenic wound infection111,167. If left untreated, most lesions eventually cease advancing and become indolent. Histological findings include a mixture of neutrophils and lymphocytes in small abscesses within the dermis.

The treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum should consist of local wound care (including changes of the dressing, application of topical sulfone compounds, and the use of a whirlpool), systemic treatment of the skin lesion, and the search for an associated systemic disease111. Incision and drainage are contraindicated. Operative excision and closure of the wound can exacerbate the disease and leave a larger defect. Laurencin and Shoen described the excision of what was thought to be an infected ulcer81. The lesion recurred at the resection margin within twenty-four hours. This rapid reappearance of the lesion at the clear margins is one of the hallmarks of the disease142. Occasionally, the lesion may result in substantial necrosis, necessitating amputation.

Systemic use of steroids (sixty to eighty milligrams of prednisone a day) has been very successful in decreasing pain and resulting in the resolution of the lesion17,41,138,144,150. If the use of corticosteroids is contraindicated because of the underlying disease (as with diabetes), then a sulfone such as orally administered dapsone14 or cyclosporin can be substituted49.


    Metastatic Lesions of the Hand
 Top
 Introduction
 Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Bites of the Brown...
 Pyogenic Granuloma
 Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Metastatic Lesions of the...
 Foreign-Body Reaction
 Factitious Diseases
 Gout
 Pseudogout
 Rheumatoid Arthritis
 References
 
Metastatic lesions distal to the elbow are distinctively rare and nearly always occur in bone. Metastasis to soft tissue is extremely rare. A review of the world literature by Kerin, in 1983, identified only 156 metastatic tumors in the hand76. Wu and Guise reported three metastatic lesions in the hand in 41,000 patients who had cancer163. Despite the rarity of the lesion, awareness of its possibility is important to prevent a misdiagnosis of infection and, hence, a delay in proper treatment131. Amadio and Lombardi identified eighteen patients who had twenty-two metastatic lesions of the hand during a forty-three-year period5. The distal phalanx was the most common location, and the lung was the most common primary site. This is consistent with the literature, in which it was reported that more than 40 per cent of metastases to the hand (fifty-five of 129 in four series) arose from a primary lung tumor44,76,93,101. The other sites of primary lesions are the breast, kidney, colon, thyroid, head and neck, and prostate.

The most common presenting symptom is continuous aching. The signs include erythema and swelling, with swelling in the phalanx presenting within six to eight weeks18 and metacarpal swelling presenting later because of the thicker soft-tissue envelope. If left untreated, the tumor may fungate, leading the unwary physician to suspect infection (Fig. 5-A). Radiographs typically reveal osteolysis within an associated soft-tissue mass (Fig. 5-B). A biopsy specimen should be taken for histological study and a culture specimen should be obtained to check for infection when any process destroys bone.



View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figs. 5-A and 5-B: Metastatic carcinoma of the distal phalanx in a patient who was seen with what was thought to be a chronic paronychia. Fig. 5-A: Photograph of the hand, showing an ulcerating lesion of the thumb pulp.

 


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5-B: Radiograph showing osteolysis of the tuft. Biopsy of a specimen showed metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma from the lung.

 
Most patients who have a metastatic lesion of the hand do not live for more than six months18. In one large review, the median duration of survival was less than five months5. Because of the poor prognosis, palliation is the primary goal for these patients. If the lesion is distal, conservative amputation provides the most rapid resolution of pain, obviates drainage from chronic wounds, and preserves maximum function of the hand. For more proximal lesions, local resection, with or without adjuvant radiation therapy, is effective in the short term and, again, preserves maximum function of the hand. Of the common primary tumors, carcinoma of the breast is most sensitive to radiation therapy.

Despite such a dismal prognosis, there have been cases in which wide excision of an isolated metastatic lesion resulted in a long-term disease-free interval5.


    Foreign-Body Reaction
 Top
 Introduction
 Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Bites of the Brown...
 Pyogenic Granuloma
 Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Metastatic Lesions of the...
 Foreign-Body Reaction
 Factitious Diseases
 Gout
 Pseudogout
 Rheumatoid Arthritis
 References
 
Injuries of the hand involving a foreign body are common. Usually the foreign body is removed; however, sometimes the patient is unaware of the penetration or the foreign body is not retrievable. Retained foreign bodies generate both acute and chronic inflammatory reactions, with the intensity of the reaction dependent on the type of material and the presence of any natural or synthetic toxins25,26,31,42,121. Chronic inflammation leads to isolation of the foreign body by granulomatous tissue25,42.

Most patients recall acute pain at the time of the initial injury. This may be followed by an asymptomatic period of weeks or months. There are several reports of previously asymptomatic patients being seen for an acute inflammatory reaction in the hand resulting from a foreign body that was deposited weeks or months earlier51,100,127.

The symptoms of a foreign-body reaction are those of acute or chronic inflammation. When a foreign body is deposited in or near a joint, symptoms include the acute onset of pain, effusion of the joint, erythema, and a decreased range of motion. These findings simulate septic arthritis40,53,106,127. A foreign body may also puncture or lie in proximity to tendon sheaths, causing aseptic inflammation, pain, and swelling37,117,127. Erosion of bone in the hand after an initial diagnosis of osteomyelitis and failed treatment with antibiotics has often led to a biopsy or resection during which a sterile foreign body surrounded by a granuloma has been identified8,51,117.

The diagnosis of a retained foreign body depends on clinical suspicion and imaging studies. Plain radiographs made in multiple projections are the first step. Russell et al. showed that adequate radiographs can demonstrate most foreign bodies133. However, wood and plastic are difficult to demonstrate on plain radiographs133, and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging may prove useful for the identification of such material95,133. In the last several years, the use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of foreign bodies in the hand has gained popularity64,69,82,83. This technique, while labor-intensive and operator-dependent, may supplant other techniques because it is less costly.

Treatment consists of operative removal. If there is secondary infection, culture of specimens and a short course of appropriate antibiotics are indicated. The complications of secondary infection, migration of the foreign body, and continued inflammation with damage to surrounding structures all militate against nonoperative treatment95,100,127,160.


    Factitious Diseases
 Top
 Introduction
 Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Bites of the Brown...
 Pyogenic Granuloma
 Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Metastatic Lesions of the...
 Foreign-Body Reaction
 Factitious Diseases
 Gout
 Pseudogout
 Rheumatoid Arthritis
 References
 
Factitious disease of the hand presenting as an infection is unusual. Causes include factitious disorder and malingering74. Factitious conditions may occur alone or in conjunction with another psychiatric illness such as conversion reaction74. Regardless, factitious disorders are characterized by the patient controlling the signs and symptoms of the illness without being aware of his or her motive74. In contrast, malingering is not strictly considered a mental illness since the patient consciously attempts to deceive others74. The motive for secondary gain can be monetary or legal.

Grunert et al.59 classified factitious disease of the hand into three categories on the basis of physical presentation: self-mutilation and manipulation of a wound (Fig. 6-A, 6-B, and 6-C), edema, and contractures. Some of the more common examples of self-mutilation include debridement, excoriation, and extension of wounds or operative incisions. In addition, new lesions or symptoms may develop along atypical paths of lymphatic drainage or in previously uninvolved areas45,59,87,116. Patients who have factitious edema may have sharp demarcations or even ligature marks124,148. Contractures of the hand may be simple or bizarre and cannot be explained on an anatomical basis. Frequently, these contractures involve muscles, nerves, or tendons that are unrelated to the described injury.



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figs. 6-A, 6-B, and 6-C: A health-care professional who was referred for treatment of what she called spontaneously acquired non-healing wounds. Figs. 6-A and 6-B: Dorsal and palmar photographs of the hand.

 


View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figs. 6-A and 6-B: Dorsal and palmar photographs of the hand.

 


View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6-C: A radiograph of the hand revealed a piece of glass (arrows). The patient subsequently admitted to self-inflicted manipulation of the wounds.

 
The diagnosis of factitious disease of the hand can be frustrating, time-consuming, and expensive. A high index of suspicion and thorough, non-confrontational evaluations are necessary. Several studies have stressed the importance of serial examinations to record the appearance of new wounds or a decrease in findings after the application of an occlusive dressing or cast45,124. Phelps et al. applied fluorescein to the wound of one patient and then applied an occlusive dressing116. Subsequent examination with a Wood lamp detected fluorescence under the nails of the uninjured hand and confirmed manipulation of the wound116. Phelps et al. recommended this procedure for detection of factitious disease. In our experience, culture of specimens from self-inflicted wounds often reveals several different types of organisms, including ones such as Enterobacter cloacae and Escherichia coli that are not usually associated with infections in the hand.

After the physician has determined that an injury of the hand is factitious, the patient may be managed non-operatively. A non-confrontational explanation of the facts is recommended, as many authors have described severe emotional and psychiatric consequences of doctor-patient confrontations3,32. Referral to a psychiatric professional is necessary to diagnose and treat underlying disorders. The prognosis for patients diagnosed with factitious disease is mixed. Grunert et al.59 found that angry or hostile patients who manipulated their wounds were especially prone to have a poor result.


    Gout
 Top
 Introduction
 Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Bites of the Brown...
 Pyogenic Granuloma
 Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Metastatic Lesions of the...
 Foreign-Body Reaction
 Factitious Diseases
 Gout
 Pseudogout
 Rheumatoid Arthritis
 References
 
Gout, in our experience, is among the most common simulators of hand infection. Any man who is more than forty years old and is seen for the acute onset of soft-tissue, tenosynovial, or synovial swelling should be carefully questioned regarding a history of hyperuricemia.

Gout is the most common of the crystalline deposition diseases, with descriptions dating back to Hippocrates2. Its pathogenesis begins with hyperuricemia and the saturation of a joint space, tendon sheath, or bursa with monosodium urate crystals75,154. In some individuals, urate crystallizes out of solution and causes an inflammatory reaction in the involved tissue. While the exact triggering mechanism is unknown, many factors, such as temperature, age, previous damage to the tissue, and heredity, may play a role73,154.

Recording a history aids in the diagnosis of gout, with most patients (1802 of 1900 in one study169) being middle-aged or elderly men. Women who are affected are almost exclusively postmenopausal, as estrogen promotes the excretion of urate75,84,154. Indeed, the onset in premenopausal women necessitates additional investigation to check for enzyme defects or renal disease. Obesity and a high alcohol intake are also frequently associated with gout75,154. Medications, such as thiazide diuretics or antimetabolites, can cause hyperuricemia and may precipitate an acute flare-up of gout75,92,130.

Questioning about a history of joint pain or a family history of gout is warranted. Previous episodes of monarthritis, particularly in the metatarsophalangeal joint of the great toe, the midtarsal joint, or the knee, that developed quickly and subsided should raise suspicion of gout75. A history of chronic or severe gout in the lower extremity increases the likelihood of involvement of an upper extremity75. A family history of gout may be found in as many as 40 per cent of patients55,75,169.

Gout is often confused with an infectious process as gout attacks may occur after an operation, infection, trauma, or illness1,54,67,73,89,99,129,130,151,156. A recent study of hospitalized patients who had crystal synovitis found that symptoms had developed in 75 per cent after they were admitted for non-musculoskeletal health problems67. Gouty arthritis may be precipitated even after minor trauma80,130,151. Postoperative attacks of gout mimicking infection of the treated hand have been reported in patients who have had a carpal tunnel release54,73.

Physical examination of the wrist and hand yields similar findings in gout and infectious arthritis or tenosynovitis54,73,75,130. Gout presents with acute swelling, erythema, and pain that is exacerbated by active or passive motion. Patients with these symptoms may also be febrile99,105. Tophi are not present in new-onset attacks, but they should be sought elsewhere as evidence of chronic disease86,152 (Fig. 7). Aspiration with crystalline analysis is helpful for establishing a diagnosis and thereby avoiding operative intervention.



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7 Photograph showing a tophus of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb, which had begun to drain. The patient had been referred for incision and drainage of a chronic infection of the joint.

 
Laboratory studies are non-specific. Both gout and infection may yield elevated erythrocyte-sedimentation rates and leukocyte counts75,119,153. Serum levels of uric acid, while helpful, are not diagnostic and are normal in 23 to 46 per cent of patients61,75,120.

Analysis of the synovial fluid is the primary means of diagnosing gout75,86,153. Even a few milliliters of synovial fluid can be analyzed for urate crystals75. Detection of negatively birefringent crystals with a polarizing microscope confirms the diagnosis75,153. Determination of glucose, leukocyte, and protein levels in the synovial fluid may be helpful but is frequently non-specific in the differentiation of infection from gout75,129,153. Gram stains and cultures should be performed for all patients, as gout and infection may occur together7,147.

Radiographs are useful in the diagnosis of chronic, but not acute, gout. Radiographic examination of patients with new acute-onset gout reveals only soft-tissue swelling or effusion of the joint. In chronic gout, tophaceous deposits (which appear as soft-tissue masses) may be detected. Additionally, well marginated erosions of bone may occur. These are typically round or oval, are oriented along the long axis of the bone, and may be intra-articular, periarticular, or at a distance from the joint. They may be large (more than five millimeters in diameter) and can be surrounded by a sclerotic border. In many patients, the erosion is partially surrounded by an overhanging margin of bone. In the hand and wrist, any joint may be involved. Preservation of the joint space (until late in the disease) and asymmetrical joint involvement help to distinguish gout from rheumatoid arthritis128 (Fig. 8).



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8 Radiograph of the hand of a patient who had chronic gout. There are typical findings of asymmetrical joint involvement, periarticular erosions, and multiple soft-tissue tophi. The interphalangeal joint of the thumb demonstrates a classic periarticular erosion with an overhanging margin of bone.

 
Medical treatment of inflammation and pain is the first priority in the management of patients who have acute gout35,157. Colchicine and high-dose non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the first line of treatment75,151. The recommended dosage of colchicine for acute attacks is 0.6 milligram every two hours until the patient has relief; until intestinal symptoms, such as nausea or diarrhea, develop; or until a maximum dose of six milligrams has been given75. Dosages of anti-inflammatory medications vary. Indomethacin, one widely used drug, may be given in an initial dose of fifty to seventy-five milligrams and then in a dosage of twenty-five to fifty milligrams three or four times a day. For patients in whom colchicine and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications are contraindicated, systemic or intra-articular administration of corticosteroids may be equally effective35,75,151. With proper treatment, most patients respond within twenty-four to forty-eight hours86. Hypouricemic agents, such as probenecid or allopurinol, should not be added or adjusted during an acute attack of gout as they may exacerbate the attack75,153. Operative treatment is not indicated for acute gout12.


    Pseudogout
 Top
 Introduction
 Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Bites of the Brown...
 Pyogenic Granuloma
 Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Metastatic Lesions of the...
 Foreign-Body Reaction
 Factitious Diseases
 Gout
 Pseudogout
 Rheumatoid Arthritis
 References
 
Intrasynovial deposition of calcium pyrophosphate crystals was discovered in 1961, during studies of patients who were believed to have gout79,91. Since then, similar crystalline deposition has been found in tendons, ligaments, and joint cartilage. Appropriately termed calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease, this clinical illness is also known as pseudogout. Radiographic evidence of deposition in hyaline cartilage or fibrocartilage (Fig. 9) has led to the term chondrocalcinosis.



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9 Representative radiograph of a wrist with advanced calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (pseudogout). There is prominent calcification within the triangular fibrocartilage complex and distal radio-ulnar joint, carpal and ulnar cysts, and advanced carpal collapse.

 
A pathological study demonstrated calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposits in 5 per cent (thirty-two) of 598 cadaver specimens of patients who were an average of seventy-two years old at the time of death89. However, the prevalence of clinically symptomatic patients is much lower. Most studies have shown the prevalence of symptoms to be half that associated with gout, or about one in 1000 patients107.

A patient history aids in the diagnosis. Most symptomatic patients are in at least the seventh decade of life. Many can describe previous episodes of pain and weakness in the affected joint89,107. Pseudogout may also be associated with metabolic diseases such as hemochromatosis, gout, hyperparathyroidism, and hypothyroidism70,107. As is the case for gout, an operation, trauma, or severe illness may precipitate acute attacks of pseudogout36,63,96,158. Occurrence in an ill patient may particularly raise the suspicion of an infectious process.

Pseudogout most commonly affects the knee. The wrist is the most common location in the upper extremity, with the lesion occurring less frequently in the metacarpophalangeal joints. Symmetrical involvement of joints is the rule; however, attacks are often unilateral.

Physical examination of the affected hand or wrist reveals the joint to be inflamed, with a mild or moderate effusion and a decreased range of motion. A pyarthrosis may be suspected on the basis of physical findings, but other methods of evaluation, including plain radiographs and arthrocentesis, aid in establishing the correct diagnosis. Pain on the ulnar side of the wrist may be particularly prominent since the triangular fibrocartilage complex is commonly involved. Radiographic evidence of chondrocalcinosis in the triangular fibrocartilage complex in a patient who has acute pain on the ulnar side of the wrist as well as an effusion is highly consistent with pseudogout. Attacks usually last about one week and may be accompanied by a low-grade fever. Acute compression of the median nerve, similar to that seen with infection of the carpal tunnel, may occur as a result of deposition of calcium pyrophosphate21,52,98,123.

Screening for deposition of calcium pyrophosphate can be done with radiographs of the knees, hips, pubic symphysis, and wrists47,107,139. Additional study is unlikely to yield positive results if these areas are devoid of calcification. A presumptive radiographic diagnosis of pseudogout may be made on the basis of punctate or linear densities in articular or fibrocartilaginous tissues.

The definitive diagnosis is based on analysis of the synovial fluid. Calcium pyrophosphate crystals are usually irregular or rhomboid in shape, although needle-shaped crystals, as in gout, may be encountered. Unlike the negatively birefringent gouty crystals, the crystals in pseudogout are positively birefringent when viewed under a polarizing microscope.

Calcium pyrophosphate crystals cannot be removed from tissues. Treatment of associated diseases also has no proved effect on the progression of crystal deposition107. Symptomatic attacks in the hand may be treated with colchicine or non-steroidal medications, such as indomethacin. Injection of corticosteroids has proved useful in selected patients70,90. For lesions presenting as carpal tunnel syndrome, operative release is the treatment of choice21.


    Rheumatoid Arthritis
 Top
 Introduction
 Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Bites of the Brown...
 Pyogenic Granuloma
 Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Metastatic Lesions of the...
 Foreign-Body Reaction
 Factitious Diseases
 Gout
 Pseudogout
 Rheumatoid Arthritis
 References
 
Rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, and the seronegative spondyloarthropathies have many pathological characteristics in common, including the ability to cause chronic progressive destruction of the hand and wrist. Confusion of an infectious condition with one of these inflammatory disorders is uncommon. However, when patients are seen because of the acute onset of monarticular inflammation or when the usual associated signs and symptoms are lacking, the specific diagnosis may be more difficult. Of the many autoimmune-related diseases, only rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis tend to present in this fashion.

While patients typically describe the insidious development of painful swollen joints in a symmetrical polyarticular fashion, confusion with an infectious process may occur when symptoms develop more acutely and in fewer joints. Acute onset has been found in 8 to 15 per cent of patients65. The acute onset of rheumatoid arthritis is especially common in elderly patients24,28. In addition, many authors have noted monarthritis, usually of the knee or wrist, as the initial manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis27,155. Episodic attacks of monarticular arthritis, with periods of complete remission, also have been described. These attacks, termed palindromic arthritis, evolve into rheumatoid arthritis in approximately 33 per cent of patients (218 of 653 in two studies60,136).

Complicating the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis is the potential coexistence of septic arthritis. Patients who have rheumatoid arthritis are more prone to joint infections103. Reasons for this may include the local and systemic effects of rheumatoid arthritis, the presence of other illnesses, or treatment with immunosuppressive medications103. Infection of the same joint may recur in as many as one-third of patients, and polyarticular joint infections develop in many patients. In order to preserve function and to prevent recurrence, such infections necessitate more intensive treatment than do similar infections in otherwise healthy patients11,50,103,104.

In rheumatoid arthritis, physical examination of the digits reveals fusiform swelling, warmth, and a decreased range of motion of involved joints. Swelling on the volar aspect of the digits indicates inflammation of the flexor tendon sheaths. While involvement of the distal interphalangeal joint is less common, it does not exclude the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis62,71. Distinction from an infectious process may be impossible on the basis of physical examination alone.

Laboratory studies are frequently not helpful in the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Initial laboratory analysis often reveals non-specific elevations of the leukocyte count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and the level of C-reactive protein. A positive rheumatoid factor is valuable as an indication, as 85 per cent of patients with rheumatoid arthritis have a positive test for rheumatoid factor145. However, the rheumatoid factor may remain negative for one to two months after the onset of the disease136. Analysis of the synovial fluid for bacteria and crystals is negative. Also, the total white-blood-cell count in the synovial fluid is lower with rheumatoid arthritis (usually 2000 to 75,000 cells per cubic millimeter [2 X 109 to 75 X 109 per liter]) than with septic arthritis (often more than 100,000 cells per cubic millimeter [100 X 109 per liter])137.

Radiographs are usually not useful in the diagnosis of new-onset rheumatoid arthritis and reveal only evidence of soft-tissue swelling128.

Effective treatment of rheumatoid arthritis depends on interruption of the complex inflammatory process. Aspirin and non-steroidal medications are first-line treatments. The trial of an agent at maximum dosage for two weeks appears to be the most accurate way to assess the efficacy of the drug13,33. Other medications, such as gold compounds, antimalarials, cytotoxic agents, or low-dose corticosteroids, are generally reserved for chronic progressive disease46,56,78,88. An operation is not indicated in the treatment of acute rheumatoid arthritis.

Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, like rheumatoid arthritis, is an autoimmune disease of unknown etiology. Unlike rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis has several distinct subtypes. In particular, monarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis may be confused initially with infection and occurs in 10 per cent (thirty-three of 316) to 31 per cent (forty of 130) of patients16,20. Pauciarticular arthritis or polyarthritis may subsequently develop in children who initially have monarticular disease. However, there is no way to predict which children are at risk for more widespread disease10. Affected joints include the knees, ankles, elbows, and wrists10,58,134. The hips and small joints of the hand are often spared. Systemic signs and symptoms such as fever are rarely present.

The diagnosis of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis is frequently one of exclusion. Aspiration of the joint, with gram-staining and culture of synovial fluid, should be done for all patients to rule out infection. Serum blood tests for rheumatoid factor are rarely positive; however, antinuclear antibodies may be positive in as many as 85 per cent of patients113,135. Radiographic evaluation frequently reveals only soft-tissue swelling.

As it does with rheumatoid arthritis, treatment centers around the reduction of inflammation of the involved joints. Aspirin and non-steroidal medications are used to decrease inflammation, although not all antiinflammatory drugs are approved for use in children146. Parents should be warned of the dangers of Reye syndrome in association with treatment with aspirin and should be told to briefly discontinue the use of aspirin during and after viral infections. Administration of corticosteroids systemically or by injection is contraindicated in most patients because of the potential for retarded skeletal growth85,108,146. Children who have monarticular or oligoarticular arthritis should be evaluated regularly by an ophthalmologist because of the occurrence of uveitis16,66,146.

In summary, despite the availability of an ever-enlarging technological armamentarium, the patient's history and physical examination remain pivotal with regard to arousing suspicion of an infection simulator. Once suspicion is raised, the diagnosis can usually be confirmed with simple laboratory tests or plain radiographs. Failure to include infection simulators in the differential diagnosis may lead to inappropriate medical or operative treatment and may compromise the clinical outcome.


    Footnotes
 
*Printed with permission of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. This article will appear in Instructional Course Lectures, Volume 46, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Illinois, March 1997.

{dagger}No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

{ddagger}2800 Winslow Avenue, Suite 401, Cincinnati, Ohio 45206.


    References
 Top
 Introduction
 Acute Calcific Tendinitis
 Bites of the Brown...
 Pyogenic Granuloma
 Pyoderma Gangrenosum
 Metastatic Lesions of the...
 Foreign-Body Reaction
 Factitious Diseases
 Gout
 Pseudogout
 Rheumatoid Arthritis
 References
 

  1. Abrahamsson, S. O.: Gouty tenosynovitis simulating an infection. A case report. Acta Orthop. Scandinavica, 58: 282-283, 1987.[Medline]

  2. Adams, K.: Hippocrates: the Genuine Works of Hippocrates. New York, Wood, 1886.

  3. Agris, J., and |and |Simmons, C. W., Jr.: Factitious (self-inflicted) skin wounds. Plast. and Reconstr. Surg., 62: 686-692, 1978.

  4. Allen, R. K., and |and |Rodman, O. G.: Pyogenic granuloma recurrent with satellite lesions. J. Dermatol. Surg. and Oncol., 5: 490-493, 1979.

  5. Amadio, P. C., and |and |Lombardi, R. M.: Metastatic tumors of the hand. J. Hand Surg., 12A: 311-316, 1987.[Medline]

  6. Auer, A. L., and |and |Hershey, F. B.: Surgery for necrotic bites of the brown spider. Arch. Surg., 108: 612-618, 1974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  7. Baer, P. A.; Tenenbaum, J.; Fam, A. G.; and |and |Little, H.: Coexistent septic and crystal arthritis. Report of four cases and literature review. J. Rheumatol., 13: 604-607, 1986.[Medline]

  8. Barry, M.; Maffulli, N.; and |and |Good, C.: The missed thorn. Acta Orthop. Belgica, 58: 468-470, 1992.[Medline]

  9. Berger, R. S.: The unremarkable brown recluse spider bite. J. Am. Med. Assn., 225: 1109-1111, 1973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  10. Blockey, N. J.; Gibson, A. A. M.; and |and |Goel, K. M.: Monarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 62-B(3): 368-371, 1980.

  11. Brancos, M. A.; Peris, P.; Miro, J. M.; Monegal, A.; Gatell, J. M.; Mallolas, J.; Mensa, J.; Garcia, S.; and |and |Munoz-Gomez, J.: Septic arthritis in heroin addicts. Sem. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 21: 81-87, 1991.

  12. Brody, G. A.; Chase, R. A.; and Hentz, V. R.: The upper extremity in gout. In Flynn's Hand Surgery, edited by J. B. Jupiter. Ed. 4, pp. 429-438. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1991.

  13. Brooks, P. M., and |and |Day, R. O.: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs—differences and similarities. New England J. Med., 324: 1716-1725, 1991.[Medline]

  14. Brown, R. E.; Lay, L.; and |and |Graham, D.: Bilateral pyoderma gangrenosum of the hand: treatment with dapsone. J. Hand Surg., 18-B: 119-121, 1993.

  15. Brunstig, L. A.; Goeckerman, W. H.; and |and |O'Leary, P. A.: Pyoderma (ecthyma) gangrenosum. Clinical and experimental observations in five cases occurring in adults. Arch. Dermatol. and Syphilol., 22: 655-680, 1930.

  16. Bywaters, E. G., and |and |Ansell, B. M.: Monoarticular arthritis in children. Ann. Rheumat. Dis., 24: 116-122, 1965.

  17. Callen, J. P., and |and |Taylor, W. B.: Pyoderma gangrenosum—a literature review. Cutis, 21: 61-64, 1978.[Medline]

  18. Carroll, R. E.: Tumors of the hand skeleton. In Flynn's Hand Surgery, edited by J. B. Jupiter. Ed. 4, p. 987. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1991.

  19. Carroll, R. E.; Sinton, W.; and |and |Garcia, A.: Acute calcium deposits in the hand. J. Am. Med. Assn., 157: 422-426, 1955.

  20. Cassidy, J. T.; Brody, G. L.; and |and |Martel, W.: Monoarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J. Pediat., 70: 867-875, 1967.[Medline]

  21. Chiu, K. Y.; Ng, W. F.; Wong, W. B.; Choi, C. H.; and |and |Chow, S. P.: Acute carpal tunnel syndrome caused by pseudogout. J. Hand Surg., 17A: 299-302, 1992.[Medline]

  22. Cohen, I: Calcareous deposit at the insertion of flexor carpi ulnaris tendon following trauma. Am. J. Surg., 38: 172-173, 1924.

  23. Cooper, P. H.; McAllister, H. A.; and |and |Helwig, E. B.: Intravenous pyogenic granuloma. A study of 18 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 3: 221-228, 1979.[Medline]

  24. Corrigan, A. B.; Robinson, R. G.; Terenty, T. R.; Dick-Smith, J. B.; and |and |Walters, D.: Benign rheumatoid arthritis of the aged. British Med. J., 1: 444-446, 1974.

  25. Cotran, R. S.; Kumar, V.; and Robbins, S. L.: Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease. Ed. 4, p. 63. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1989.

  26. Cracchiolo, A., III, and |and |Goldberg, L.: Local and systemic reactions to puncture injuries by the sea urchin spine and the date palm thorn. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 20: 1206-1212, 1977.

  27. David-Chaussé, J.; Ricard, A.-M.; and |and |Dehais, J.: 22 cas de monoarthrites rhumatismales de l'adulte (hanches exclues). Rev. rhumat., 39: 775-778, 1972.

  28. Deal, C. L.; Meenan, R. F.; Goldenberg, D. L.; Anderson, J. J.; Sack, B.; Pastan, R. S.; and |and |Cohen, A. S.: The clinical features of elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis. A comparison with younger-onset disease of similar duration. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 28: 987-994, 1985.

  29. DiFazio, F., and |and |Mogan, J.: Intravenous pyogenic granuloma of the hand. J. Hand Surg., 14A: 310-312, 1989.[Medline]

  30. Dilley, D. F., and |and |Tonkin, M. A.: Acute calcific tendinitis in the hand and wrist. J. Hand Surg., 16-B: 215-216, 1991.[Medline]

  31. Doig, S. G., and |and |Cole, W. G.: Plant thorn synovitis. Resolution following total synovectomy. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 72-B(3): 514-515, 1990.

  32. Drinker, H.; Knorr, N. J.; and |and |Edgerton, M. T., Jr.: Factitious wounds. A psychiatric and surgical dilemma. Plast. and Reconstr. Surg., 50: 458-461, 1972.

  33. Dromgoole, S. H.; Furst, D. E.; and |and |Paulus, H. E.: Rational approaches to the use of salicylates in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Sem. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 11: 257-283, 1981.

  34. Eichner, E. R: Spider bite hemolytic anemia: positive Coombs' test, erythrophagocytosis, and leukoerythroblastic smear. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 81: 683-687, 1984.[Medline]

  35. Emmerson, B. T.: The management of gout. New England J. Med., 334: 445-451, 1996.[Free Full Text]

  36. Esposito, P. W.; O'Malley, D.; and |and |Litaker, D.: Acute pseudogout mimicking septic arthritis following urologic manipulation. Orthop. Rev., 17: 295-299, 1988.[Medline]

  37. Ettelson, C. D., and |and |Weeks, P. M.: Thorn-induced tenosynovitis of the hand. Case report. Missouri Med., 81: 257-259, 1984.

  38. Evans, C. D., and |and |Warin, R. P.: Pyogenic granuloma with local recurrences (2 cases). British J. Dermatol., 69: 106-108, 1957.

  39. Fardon, D. W.; Wingo, C. W.; Robinson, D. W.; and |and |Masters, F. W.: The treatment of brown spider bite. Plast. and Reconstr. Surg., 40: 482-488, 1967.

  40. Fasano, F. J., Jr., and |and |Hansen, R. H.: Foreign body granuloma and synovitis of the finger: a hazard of ring removal by the sawing technique. J. Hand Surg., 12A: 621-623, 1987.[Medline]

  41. Ferlic, D. C.: Pyoderma gangrenosum presenting as an acute suppurative hand infection—a case report. J. Hand Surg., 8: 573-575, 1983.[Medline]

  42. Ferreiro-Seoane, J. L.: Foreign body synovitis. In Primer on the Rheumatic Diseases, edited by H. R. Schumacher, J. H. Klippel, and W. J. Koopman. Ed. 10, pp. 294-295. Atlanta, Arthritis Foundation, 1993.

  43. Foil, L. D., and |and |Norment, B. R.: Envenomation by Loxosceles reclusa. J. Med. Entomol., 16: 18-25, 1979.[Medline]

  44. Fragiadakis, E. G., and |and |Panayotopoulos, G.: Metastatic carcinoma of the hand. Hand, 4: 268-272, 1972.[Medline]

  45. Friedman, B.; Yaffe, B.; Blankstein, A.; Rubinstein, E.; and |and |Rieck, J.: Self-inflicted hand injuries: diagnostic challenge and treatment. Ann. Plast. Surg., 20: 345-350, 1988.[Medline]

  46. Furst, D. E.: Rational use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Drugs, 39: 19-37, 1990.[Medline]

  47. Genant, H. K.: Roentgenographic aspects of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease (pseudogout). Arthrit. and Rheumat., 19: 307-328, 1976.

  48. Glicenstein, J.; Ohana, J.; and Leclercq, C.: Tumours of the Hand, p. 216. Translated by D. Le Vay. New York, Springer, 1988.

  49. Goldberg, N. S.; Ottuso, P.; and |and |Petro, J.: Cyclosporine for pyoderma gangrenosum. Plast. and Reconstr. Surg., 91: 91-93, 1993.

  50. Goldenberg, D. L.: Infectious arthritis complicating rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic rheumatic disorders. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 32: 496-502, 1989.

  51. Goldstein, S. A., and |and |Imbriglia, J. E.: Erosion of the triquetrum and pisiform bones caused by a foreign body granuloma. J. Hand Surg., 11A: 899-901, 1986.[Medline]

  52. Goodwin, D. R., and |and |Arbel, R.: Pseudogout of the wrist presenting as acute median nerve compression. J. Hand Surg., 10-B: 261-262, 1985.[Medline]

  53. Goupille, P.; Fouquet, B.; Favard, L.; Burdin, P.; and |and |Valat, J. P.: Two cases of plant thorn synovitis. Difficulties in diagnosis and treatment. J. Rheumatol., 17: 252-254, 1990.[Medline]

  54. Graff, S. N.; Seiler, J. G., III; and |and |Jupiter, J. B.: Acute gout after carpal tunnel release. J. Hand Surg., 17A: 1031-1032, 1992.[Medline]

  55. Grahame, R., and |and |Scott, J. T.: Clinical survey of 354 patients with gout. Ann. Rheumat. Dis., 29: 461-468, 1970.[Free Full Text]

  56. Gray, R. G.; Tenenbaum, J.; and |and |Gottlieb, N. L.: Local corticosteroid injection treatment in rheumatic disorders. Sem. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 10: 231-254, 1981.

  57. Greene, T. L., and |and |Louis, D. S.: Calcifying tendinitis in the hand. Ann. Emerg. Med., 9: 438-440, 1980.[Medline]

  58. Gristina, A. G.; Kelsey, W. M.; Green, D. L.; and |and |Bashara, J. G.: Pauciarticular juvenile arthritis. Southern Med. J., 69: 440-441, 1976.[Medline]

  59. Grunert, B. K.; Sanger, J. R.; Matloub, H. S.; and |and |Yousif, N. J.: Classification system for factitious syndromes in the hand with implications for treatment. J. Hand Surg., 16A: 1027-1030, 1991.[Medline]

  60. Guerne, P. A., and |and |Weisman, M. H.: Palindromic rheumatism: part of or apart from the spectrum of rheumatoid arthritis. Am. J. Med., 93: 451-460, 1992.[Medline]

  61. Hadler, N. M.; Franck, W. A.; Bress, N. M.; and |and |Robinson, D. R.: Acute polyarticular gout. Am. J. Med., 56: 715-719, 1974.[Medline]

  62. Halla, J. T.; Fallahi, S.; and |and |Hardin, J. G.: Small joint involvement: a systematic roentgenographic study in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheumat. Dis., 45: 327-330, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  63. Hamblen, D. L.; Currey, H. L. F.; and |and |Key, J. J.: Pseudogout simulating acute suppurative arthritis. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 48-B(1): 51-55, 1966.

  64. Hansson, G.; Beebe, A. C.; Carroll, N. C.; and |and |Donaldson, J. S.: A piece of wood in the hand diagnosed by ultrasonography. Acta Orthop. Scandinavica, 59: 459-460, 1988.[Medline]

  65. Harris, E. D., Jr.: Rheumatoid arthritis: the clinical spectrum. In Textbook of Rheumatology, edited by W. N. Kelley, E. D. Harris, Jr., S. Ruddy, and C. B. Sledge. Ed. 2, vol. 1, pp. 915-950. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1985.

  66. Hemady, R. K.; Baer, J. C.; and |and |Foster, C. S.: Immunosuppressive drugs in the management of progressive, corticosteroid-resistant uveitis associated with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Internat. Opthalmol. Clin., 32: 241-252, 1992.

  67. Ho, G., Jr., and |and |DeNuccio, M.: Gout and pseudogout in hospitalized patients. Arch. Intern. Med., 153: 2787-2790, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  68. Holt, P. J.: The current status of pyoderma gangrenosum. Clin. and Exper. Dermatol., 4: 509-516, 1979.

  69. Howden, M. D.: Foreign bodies within finger tendon sheaths demonstrated by ultrasound: two cases. Clin. Radiol., 49: 419-420, 1994.[Medline]

  70. Howell, D. S.: Diseases due to the deposition of calcium pyrophosphate and hydroxyapatite. In Textbook of Rheumatology, edited by W. N. Kelley, E. D. Harris, Jr., S. Ruddy, and C. B. Sledge. Ed. 2, vol. 2, pp. 1398-1416. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1985.

  71. Jacob, J.; Sartoris, D.; Kursunoglu, S.; Pate, D.; Pineda, C. J.; Braun, R. M.; Resnick, D.; and |and |Weisman, M. H.: Distal interphalangeal joint involvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 29: 10-15, 1986.

  72. Jansen, G. T.; Morgan, P. N.; McQueen, N. N.; and |and |Bennett, W. E.: The brown recluse spider bite: controlled evaluation of treatment using the white rabbit as an animal model. Southern Med. J., 64: 1194-1202, 1971.[Medline]

  73. Kalia, K. K., and |and |Moossy, J. J.: Carpal tunnel release complicated by acute gout. Neurosurgery, 33: 1102-1103, 1993.[Medline]

  74. Kaplan, H. I., and Sadock, B. J.: Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences, Clinical Psychiatry. Ed. 6, p. 480. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1991.

  75. Kelley, W. N., and Fox, I. H.: Gout and related disorders of purine metabolism. In Textbook of Rheumatology, edited by W. N. Kelley, E. D. Harris, Jr., S. Ruddy, and C. B. Sledge. Ed. 2, vol. 2, pp. 1359-1398. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1985.

  76. Kerin, R.: Metastatic tumors of the hand. A review of the literature. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 65-A: 1331-1335, Dec. 1983.[Free Full Text]

  77. King, L. E., Jr., and |and |Rees, R. S.: Dapsone treatment of a brown recluse bite. J. Am. Med. Assn., 250: 648, 1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  78. Klippel, J. H.: Winning the battle, losing the war? Another editorial about rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol., 17: 1118-1122, 1990.[Medline]

  79. Kohn, N. N.; Hughes, R. E.; McCarty, D. J., Jr.; and |and |Faires, J. S.: The significance of calcium phosphate crystals in the synovial fluid of arthritic patients: the "pseudogout syndrome" II. Identification of crystals. Ann. Intern. Med., 56: 738-745, 1962.

  80. Kolba, K. S.: The approach to the acute joint and synovial fluid examination. Prim. Care, 11: 211-218, 1984.[Medline]

  81. Laurencin, C. T., and |and |Shoen, S. L.: Pyoderma gangrenosum affecting the hand. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 76-B(6): 985-986, 1994.

  82. Lejeune, A., and |and |Nizet, M.: Detection of foreign bodies in hand [letter]. J. Hand Surg., 18A: 166-168, 1993.

  83. Levine, W. N., and |and |Leslie, B. M.: The use of ultrasonography to detect a radiolucent foreign body in the hand: a case report. J. Hand Surg., 18A: 218-220, 1993.

  84. Levinson, D. J.; and Becker, M. A.: Clinical gout and the pathogenesis of hyperuricemia. In Arthritis and Allied Conditions: a Textbook of Rheumatology, edited by D. J. McCarty and W. J. Koopman. Ed. 12, vol. 2, pp. 1773-1805. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1993.

  85. Lindsley, C. B.: Pharmacotherapy of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pediat. Clin. North America, 28: 161-177, 1981.

  86. Lockie, L. M.: Diagnosis of gouty arthritis. Am. J. Orthop., 2: 252-253, 1960.

  87. Louis, D. S.; Lamp, M. K.; and |and |Greene, T. L.: The upper extremity and psychiatric illness. J. Hand Surg., 10A: 687-693, 1985.[Medline]

  88. McCarty, D. J.: Treatment of rheumatoid joint inflammation with triamcinolone hexacetonide. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 15: 157-173, 1972.

  89. McCarty, D. J.: Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition disease—1975. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 19 (Supplement 3): 275-285, 1976.

  90. McCarty, D. J.: Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease. In Primer on the Rheumatic Diseases, edited by H. R. Schumacher, J. H. Klippel, and W. J. Koopman. Ed. 10, pp. 219-222. Atlanta, Arthritis Foundation, 1993.

  91. McCarty, D. J., and |and |Hollander, J. L.: Identification of urate crystals in gouty synovial fluid. Ann. Intern. Med., 54: 452-460, 1961.

  92. Macfarlane, D. G., and |and |Dieppe, P. A.: Diuretic-induced gout in elderly women. British J. Rheumatol., 24: 155-157, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  93. Mangini, U.: Tumors of the skeleton of the hand. Bull. Hosp. Joint Dis., 28: 61-103, 1967.

  94. Manus, D. A.; Sherbert, D.; and |and |Jackson, I. T.: Management considerations for the granuloma of pregnancy. Plast. and Reconstr. Surg., 95: 1045-1050, 1995.

  95. Marquis, G. P.: Radiolucent foreign bodies in the hand: case report. J. Trauma, 29: 403-404, 1989.[Medline]

  96. Masuda, I., and |and |Ishikawa, I. C.: Clinical features of pseudogout attack. A survey of 50 cases. Clin. Orthop., 229: 173-181, 1988.

  97. Millon, S. J.; Bush, D. C.; and |and |Harrington, T. M.: Acute calcific tendinitis in a child: a case report. J. Hand Surg., 18A: 592-593, 1993.[Medline]

  98. Monsivais, J. J.: Acute carpal tunnel syndrome due to pseudogout [letter]. J. Hand Surg., 18-B: 409, 1993.

  99. Moore, J. R., and |and |Weiland, A. J.: Gouty tenosynovitis in the hand. J. Hand Surg., 10A: 291-295, 1985.[Medline]

  100. Morgan, W. J.; Leopold, T.; and |and |Evans, R.: Foreign bodies in the hand. J. Hand Surg., 9-B: 194-196, 1984.[Medline]

  101. Morris, D. M., and |and |House, H. C.: The significance of metastasis to the bones and soft tissues of the hand. J. Surg. Oncol., 28: 146-150, 1985.[Medline]

  102. Moyer, R. A.; Bush, D. C.; and |and |Harrington, T. M.: Acute calcific tendinitis of the hand and wrist: a report of 12 cases and a review of the literature. J. Rheumatol., 16: 198-202, 1989.[Medline]

  103. Myers, A. R.: Septic arthritis caused by bacteria. In Textbook of Rheumatology, edited by W. N. Kelley, E. D. Harris, Jr., S. Ruddy, and C. B. Sledge. Ed. 2, vol. 2, pp. 1507-1527. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1985.

  104. Myers, A. R.; Miller, L. M.; and |and |Pinals, R. S.: Pyarthrosis complicating rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet, 2: 714-716, 1969.[Medline]

  105. Newman, J. H.: The differential diagnosis of septic arthritis in the elderly. Comp. Ther., 10: 29-34, 1984.

  106. O'Connor, C. R.; Reginato, A. J.; and |and |DeLong, W. G., Jr.: Foreign body reactions simulating acute septic arthritis. J. Rheumatol., 15: 1568-1571, 1988.[Medline]

  107. O'Duffy, J. D.: Clinical studies of acute pseudogout attacks: comments on prevalence, predispositions, and treatment. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 19 (Supplement 3): 344-352, 1976.

  108. Orozco-Alcala, J J., and |and |Baum, J.: Treatment of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis—a world survey. J. Rheumatol., 1: 187-189, 1974.[Medline]

  109. Palmieri, T. J.: Vascular tumors of the hand and forearm. Hand Clin., 3: 225-240, 1987.[Medline]

  110. Palmieri, T. J.: Common tumors of the hand. Orthop. Rev., 16: 367-378, 1987.[Medline]

  111. Papilion, J. D., and |and |Bergfield, T. G.: Pyoderma gangrenosum complicating infection of the hand. A case report and review of the literature. Clin. Orthop., 254: 144-146, 1990.

  112. Perry, H. O.: Pyoderma gangrenosum. Australian J. Dermatol., 23: 53-61, 1982.

  113. Petty, R. E.; Cassidy, J. T.; and |and |Sullivan, D. B.: Clinical correlates of antinuclear antibodies in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J. Pediat., 83: 386-389, 1973.[Medline]

  114. Phalen, G. S.: Calcification adjacent to the pisiform bone. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 34-A: 579-583, July 1952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  115. Phalen, G. S.: Stenosing tenosynovitis: trigger fingers, trigger thumb, and de Quervain's disease. Acute calcification in wrist and hand. In Flynn's Hand Surgery, edited by J. B. Jupiter. Ed. 4, pp. 444-447. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1991.

  116. Phelps, D. B.; Buchler, U.; and |and |Boswick, J. A., Jr.: The diagnosis of factitious ulcer of the hand: a case report. J. Hand Surg., 2: 105-108, 1977.[Medline]

  117. Piard, F.; Levillain, P.; Michiels, R.; Justrabo, R.; Regnard, P. J.; and |and |Kwasek, P.: Les tenosynovites a piquant vegetal. Arch. Anat. Cytol. Pathol., 33: 257-260, 1985.[Medline]

  118. Popkin, G. L.: Tumors of the skin: a dermatologist's viewpoint. In Plastic Surgery, edited by J. G. McCarthy, J. W. May, Jr., and J. W. Littler. Vol. 5, pp. 3561-3585. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1990.

  119. Preslar, A. J., III, and |and |Heckman, J. D.: Emergency department evaluation of the swollen joint. Emerg. Med. Clin. North America, 2: 425-440, 1984.[Medline]

  120. Raddatz, D. A.; Mahowald, M. L.; and |and |Bilka, P. J.: Acute polyarticular gout. Ann. Rheumat. Dis., 42: 117-122, 1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  121. Ramanathan, E. B. S., and |and |Luiz, C. P. J.: Date palm thorn synovitis. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 72-B(3): 512-513, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  122. Rand, R. P.; Brown, G. L.; and |and |Bostwick, J., III: Pyoderma gangrenosum and progressive cutaneous ulceration. Ann. Plast. Surg., 20: 280-284, 1988.[Medline]

  123. Rate, A. J.; Parkinson, R. W.; Meadows, T. H.; and |and |Freemont, A. J.: Acute carpal tunnel syndrome due to pseudogout. J. Hand Surg., 17-B: 217-218, 1992.

  124. Reading, G.: Secretan's syndrome: hard edema of the dorsum of the hand. Plast. and Reconstr. Surg., 65: 182-187, 1980.

  125. Rees, R. S.; Altenbern, D. P.; Lynch, J. B.; and |and |King, L. E., Jr.: Brown recluse spider bites. A comparison of early surgical excision versus dapsone and delayed surgical excision. Ann. Surg., 202: 659-663, 1985.[Medline]

  126. Rees, R.; Campbell, D.; Rieger, E.; and |and |King, L. E.: The diagnosis and treatment of brown recluse spider bites. Ann. Emerg. Med., 16: 945-949, 1987.[Medline]

  127. Reginato, A. J.; Ferreiro, J. L.; O'Connor, C. R.; Barbasan, C.; Arasa, J.; Bednar, J.; and |and |Soler, J.: Clinical and pathologic studies of twenty-six patients with penetrating foreign body injury to the joints, bursae, and tendon sheaths. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 33: 1753-1762, 1990.

  128. Resnick, D., and Niwayama, G.: Gouty arthritis. In Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Disorders, pp. 1115-1155. Edited by D. Resnick. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1985.

  129. Riordan, D. C.: The hands in gout. Am. J. Orthop., 2: 256-259, 1960.

  130. Rogachefsky, R. A.; Carneiro, R.; Altman, R. D.; and |and |Burkhalter, W. E.: Gout presenting as infectious arthritis. Two case reports. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 76-A: 269-273, Feb 1994.[Free Full Text]

  131. Rose, B. A., and |and |Wood, F. M.: Metastatic bronchogenic carcinoma masquerading as a felon. J. Hand Surg., 8: 325-328, 1983.[Medline]

  132. Russell, F. E.; Waldron, W. G.; and |and |Madon, M. B.: Bites by the brown spiders Loxosceles unicolor and Loxosceles arizonica in California and Arizona. Toxicon, 7: 109-117, 1969.[Medline]

  133. Russell, R. C.; Williamson, D. A.; Sullivan, J. W.; Suchy, H.; and |and |Suliman, O.: Detection of foreign bodies in the hand. J. Hand Surg., 16A: 2-11, 1991.

  134. Schaller, J., and |and |Wedgwood, R. J.: Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: a review. Pediatrics, 50: 940-953, 1972.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  135. Schaller, J. G.; Johnson, G. D.; Holborow, E. J.; Ansell, B. M.; and |and |Smiley, W. K.: The association of antinuclear antibodies with the chronic iridocyclitis of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (Still's disease). Arthrit. and Rheumat., 17: 409-416, 1974.

  136. Schumacher, H. R.: Palindromic onset of rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical, synovial fluid, and biopsy studies. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 25: 361-369, 1982.

  137. Schumacher, H. R.: Synovial fluid analysis. In Textbook of Rheumatology, edited by W. N. Kelley, E. D. Harris, Jr., S. Ruddy, and C. B. Sledge. Ed. 2, vol. 1, pp. 561-568. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1985.

  138. Schwaitzberg, S. D.; Bradshaw, M. W.; and |and |Williams, T. W., Jr.: Pyoderma gangrenosum. A possible cause of wound necrosis. Arch. Surg., 117: 363-367, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  139. Scutellari, P. N.; Orzincolo, C.; and |and |Droghetti, M.: La malattia da depositi cristallini di pirofosfato diidrato di calcio. Radiol. Med. (Torino), 71: 129-134, 1985.[Medline]

  140. Selby, C. L.: Acute calcific tendinitis of the hand: an infrequently recognized and frequently misdiagnosed form of periarthritis. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 27: 337-340, 1984.

  141. Shall, L.; Stevens, A.; and |and |Saihan, E. M.: Recurrent erythematous nodule on the sole of the foot. Recurrent pyogenic granuloma. Arch. Dermatol., 127: 1219-1220, 1222-1223, 1991.

  142. Shands, J. W., Jr.; Flowers, F. P.; Hill, H. M.; and |and |Smith, J. O.: Pyoderma gangrenosum in a kindred. Precipitation by surgery or mild physical trauma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 16: 931-934, 1987.[Medline]

  143. Shaw, J. A.: Acute calcific tendonitis in the hand. Orthop. Rev., 15: 482-485, 1986.[Medline]

  144. Shore, R. N.: New look at pyoderma gangrenosum. Cutis, 20: 209-213, 1977.[Medline]

  145. Singer, J. M., and |and |Plotz, C. M.: The latex fixation test. I. Application to the serologic diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Am. J. Med., 21: 888-892, 1956.[Medline]

  146. Singsen, B. H.: Nonarticular rheumatism, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile spondylarthropathies. In Primer on the Rheumatic Diseases, edited by H. R. Schumacher, J. H. Klippel, and W. J. Koopman. Ed. 10, pp. 171-175. Atlanta, Arthritis Foundation, 1993.

  147. Smith, J. W.: Infectious arthritis. In Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, edited by G. L. Mandell, R. G. Douglas, Jr., and J. E. Bennett. Ed. 3, pp. 911-913. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1990.

  148. Smith, R. J.: Factitious lymphedema of the hand. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 57-A: 89-94, Jan. 1975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  149. Snyder, C. C., and Leonard, L. G.: Bites and stings of the hand. In The Hand, edited by R. Tubiana. Vol. 3, pp. 894-895. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1988.

  150. Stolman, L. P.; Rosenthal, D.; Yaworskly, R.; and |and |Horan, F.: Pyoderma gangrenosum and rheumatoid arthritis. Arch. Dermatol., 111: 1020-1023, 1975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  151. Straub, L. R.; Smith, J. W.; Carpenter, G. K.; and |and |Dietz, G. H.: The surgery of gout in the upper extremity. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 43-A: 731-752, 774, July 1961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  152. Talbott, J. H.: Diagnosis of gout. Clin. Orthop., 71: 23-27, 1970.[Medline]

  153. Tate, G. A., and Schumacher, H. R.: Gout clinical and laboratory features. In Primer on the Rheumatic Diseases, edited by H. R. Schumacher, J. H. Klippel, and W. J. Koopman. Ed. 10, p. 213. Atlanta, Arthritis Foundation, 1993.

  154. Terkeltaub, R.: Gout epidemiology, pathology, and pathogenesis. In Primer on the Rheumatic Diseases, edited by H. R. Schumacher, J. H. Klippel, and W. J. Koopman. Ed. 10, pp. 209-213. Atlanta, Arthritis Foundation, 1993.

  155. Villiaumey, J.; Strauss, J.; Di Menza, C.; Larget-Piet, B.; and |and |Rotterdam, M.: Les monoarthrites rhumatoïdes. Rev. rhum., 40: 627-634, 1973.[Medline]

  156. Vukmir, R. B.; Weiss, L.; and |and |Verdile, V. P.: Polyarticular symmetric tophaceous joint inflammation as the initial presentation of gout. Am. J. Emerg. Med., 8: 43-45, 1990.[Medline]

  157. Wallace, S. L., and |and |Singer, J. Z.: Therapy in gout. Rheumat. Dis. Clin. North America, 14: 441-457, 1988.[Medline]

  158. Wallace, S. L.; Robinson, H.; Masi, A. T.; Decker, J. L.; McCarty, D. J.; and |and |Yu, T. F.: Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 20: 895-900, 1977.

  159. Warner, J., and |and |Jones, E. W.: Pyogenic granuloma recurring with multiple satellites. A report of 11 cases. British J. Dermatol., 80: 218-227, 1968.[Medline]

  160. Wendt, J. R., and |and |Ackley, S. M.: Vascular complications of a foreign body in the hand of an asymptomatic patient. Ann. Plast. Surg., 34: 92-94, 1995.[Medline]

  161. Witthaut, J.; Steffens, K.; and |and |Koob, E.: Reliable treatment of pyogenic granuloma of the hand. J. Hand Surg., 19-B: 791-793, 1994.[Medline]

  162. Wong, R. C.; Hughes, S. E.; and |and |Voorhees, J. J.: Spider bites. Arch. Dermatol., 123: 98-104, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  163. Wu, K. K., and |and |Guise, E. R.: Metastatic tumors of the hand: a report of six cases. J. Hand Surg., 3: 271-276, 1978.[Medline]

  164. Wustrack, K. O., and |and |Zarem, H. A.: Pyoderma gangrenosum: recognition and management. Plast. and Reconstr. Surg., 62: 423-428, 1978.

  165. Yosipovitch, G., and |and |Yosipovitch, Z.: Acute calcific periarthritis of the hand and elbows in women. A study and review of the literature. J. Rheumatol., 20: 1533-1538, 1993.[Medline]

  166. Young, V. L., and |and |Pin, P.: The brown recluse spider bite. Ann. Plast. Surg., 20: 447-452, 1988.[Medline]

  167. Young, V. L.; Fernando, B.; Tabas, M.; Wells, S. A., Jr.; and |and |Nouhan, R.: A case study of pyoderma gangrenosum. J. Hand Surg., 13A: 259-262, 1988.[Medline]

  168. Yu, T. F.: Some unusual features of gouty arthritis in females. Sem. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 6: 247-255, 1977.

  169. Yu, T., and |and |Yu, T. F.: Milestones in the treatment of gout. Am. J. Med., 56: 676-685, 1974.[Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KANN, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by STERN, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by KANN, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by STERN, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?