The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2008;90:1171.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.9005.ebo1
© 2008 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Evidence-Based Orthopaedics |
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Did Not Reduce Arthroscopy Rates or Improve Outcomes for Patients Waiting for Knee Surgery
Bridgman S, Richards PJ, Walley G, MacKenzie G, Clement D, McCall I, Griffiths D, Maffulli N. The Effect of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans on Knee Arthroscopy: Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy. 2007 Nov;23:1167-73.e1.[Medline]
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Question: In patients waiting for knee surgery, does the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans reduce arthroscopy rates and improve clinical outcomes?
Design: Randomized (unclear allocation concealment), blinded (patients, physiotherapists, and radiologists) controlled trial with 6 months of follow-up after surgery or scheduled surgery date.
Setting: A teaching hospital with a core catchment population of approximately 500,000 persons in the United Kingdom.
Patients: 252 patients (mean age 43 y, 68% men) who were on a waiting list for knee arthroscopy (mean duration of symptoms, 46 wk). Exclusion criteria were age <18 years; primary synovial disease, knee infection, or tumor; arthroscopy or MRI of the affected knee in the previous 12 months; contraindication to MRI scanning; or multiple . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Patrick A. Ruwe, MD1
1 New Haven, CT

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|