The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:76-81.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00606
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Evaluation of Complications Associated with Six Hundred Mini-Subvastus Total Knee Arthroplasties
William C. Schroer, MD,
Paul J. Diesfeld, PA-C,
Mary E. Reedy, RN and
Angela R. LeMarr, RN
Corresponding author: William C. Schroer, MD St. Louis Joint
Replacement Institute, 12266 DePaul Drive, Suite 220, St. Louis, MO 63044.
E-mail address:
drschroer@yahoo.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Minimally invasive surgical techniques have been developed in an effort to
improve functional recovery following total knee
arthroplasty1-13.
A primary concern about minimally invasive surgical techniques is a possible
increase in the rate of complications compared with that associated with
so-called traditional total knee arthroplasty techniques involving a medial
parapatellar arthrotomy. These concerns are well outlined in the physician
advisory statement from the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons:
"Minimally Invasive and Small Incision Joint Replacement Surgery:
What Surgeons Should
Consider."14
This pamphlet outlines several features of minimally invasive total knee
arthroplasty that may be associated with an increased rate of
complications:
- Increased complexity of minimally invasive surgical techniques may be
associated with increased operative time, which may lead to increased rates of
infection, blood loss, or thromboembolic events.
- Decreased visualization inherent to minimally invasive surgical techniques
may lead to increased rates of intraoperative fracture, ligament damage, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|