The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2006;88:1897-1907.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00346
© 2006 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
What's New in Spine Surgery
Keith H. Bridwell, MD1,
Paul A. Anderson, MD2,
Scott D. Boden, MD3,
Alexander R. Vaccaro, MD4 and
Jeffrey C. Wang, MD5
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine,
One Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, Suite 11300 West Pavilion, Campus Box 8233,
St. Louis, MO 63110. E-mail address:
bridwellk@wudosis.wustl.edu
2 Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin
Hospital, 600 Highland Avenue, Suite K4-738 CSC, Madison, WI 53792-0001.
E-mail address:
anderson@orthorehab.wisc.edu
3 The Emory Spine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, 2165 North
Decatur Road, Decatur, GA 30033. E-mail address:
Scott_boden@emoryhealthcare.org
4 Rothman Institute at Jefferson, 925 Chestnut Street, 5th Floor, Philadelphia,
PA 19107-4216. E-mail address:
alexvaccaro3@aol.com
5 University of California Los Angeles Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and
Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, 1250
16th Street, 7th Floor Tower, Room 715, Santa Monica, CA 90404. E-mail
address:
jwang@mednet.ucla.edu
Specialty Update has been developed in collaboration with the Council of
Musculoskeletal Specialty Societies (COMSS) of the American Academy of
Orthopaedic Surgeons.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
 |
What's New in the Treatment of the Cervical Spine
|
|---|
As is the case with other areas of the spine, advances in the treatment of
the cervical spine have been made in the development of new technology such as
disc arthroplasty, in the achievement of a better understanding of surgical
morbidity, and in attempts to document outcomes of neurologic recovery. These
issues were the focus of annual meetings of both the Cervical Spine Research
Society and its European counterpart in 2005.
Disc Arthroplasty
Additional evidence establishing the efficacy of cervical arthroplasty has
been reported. The short-term results associated with three different cervical
disc prostheses have demonstrated equivalency or slight improvement in
comparison with the results of fusion in randomized, controlled trials. The
indications for arthroplasty in the ongoing United States Food and Drug
Administration Investigational Device Exemption investigations are
single-level treatment for radiculopathy or myelopathy in patients with a
stable spine. Motion ranging from 7° to 12° has been maintained after
arthroplasty. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
|