The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:1671-1672.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00554
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Related Article]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JBJS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zarins, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zarins, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Editorial
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Editorial

Are Validated Questionnaires Valid?

Bertram Zarins, MD, Consulting Editor for Sports Medicine

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

There was once a time when outcome studies involving only subjective data were not published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. Objective data, such as physical examination findings, were required when reporting on the efficacy of an operation. This issue of The Journal features an article on the outcome of surgery as determined on the basis of retrospective questions only. What has led to this change in attitude? "Outcome measures" are now in vogue. Questionnaires have now been "validated." It is possible to fall into the trap that if an author uses a validated questionnaire, then the result will be valid.

In the article entitled "Clinical Outcome at a Minimum of Five Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction," answers to five questionnaires that were sent to patients more than five years after surgery were compared with information gathered before and at the time of surgery. The . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JBJS:

Are Validated Questionnaires Valid?
James D. Heckman
JBJS 2006 88: 446. [Extract] [Full Text]  

Allen F. Anderson and James J. Irrgang
JBJS 2006 88: 446-447. [Extract] [Full Text]  

Bruce D. Beynnon, Ewa Roos, Stefan Lohmander, and Robert J. Johnson
JBJS 2006 88: 448. [Extract] [Full Text]  

James G. Wright
JBJS 2006 88: 448. [Extract] [Full Text]  

Frederick A. Matsen, III and Edward V. Fehringer
JBJS 2006 88: 448-450. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. L. Martin, N. G. Mohtadi, M. R. Safran, M. Leunig, H. D. Martin, J. McCarthy, C. A. Guanche, B. T. Kelly, J. W. Thomas Byrd, J. C. Clohisy, et al.
Differences in Physician and Patient Ratings of Items Used to Assess Hip Disorders
Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2009; 37(8): 1508 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. W. Poolman, M. F. Swiontkowski, J. C.T. Fairbank, E. H. Schemitsch, S. Sprague, and H. C.W. de Vet
Outcome Instruments: Rationale for Their Use
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2009; 91(Supplement_3): 41 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
R. W. Wright
Knee Injury Outcomes Measures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2009; 17(1): 31 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. W. Poolman, P. A.A. Struijs, R. Krips, I. N. Sierevelt, R. K. Marti, F. Farrokhyar, and M. Bhandari
Reporting of Outcomes in Orthopaedic Randomized Trials: Does Blinding of Outcome Assessors Matter?
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2007; 89(3): 550 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D.P. Forward, A.K. Singh, T.M. Lawrence, J.S. Sithole, T.R.C. Davis, and J.A. Oni
Preservation of the Ulnar Bursa Within the Carpal Tunnel: Does It Improve the Outcome of Carpal Tunnel Surgery? A Randomized, Controlled Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2006; 88(11): 2432 - 2438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. P. Grelsamer and D. A. Stein
Patellofemoral Arthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2006; 88(8): 1849 - 1860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Are Validated Questionnaires Valid?
James G. Wright, M.D.
JBJS Online, 21 Sep 2005 [Full text]
Are Validated Questionnaires Valid?
Allen F. Anderson, M.D., et al.
JBJS Online, 25 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Are Validated Questionnaires Valid?
Bruce D. Beynnon, et al.
JBJS Online, 29 Sep 2005 [Full text]
Counterpoint to “Are Validated Questionnaires Valid?”
Frederick A. Matsen, M.D., et al.
JBJS Online, 25 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Dr.Zarins responds to Drs. Anderson and Irrgang
Bertram Zarins, M.D., et al.
JBJS Online, 25 Oct 2005 [Full text]
Perspective Bias
John E. Kuhn
JBJS Online, 21 Nov 2005 [Full text]