The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2004;86:2571
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Proximal Tibial Osteotomy
S. Robert Rozbruch, MD1
1 The Hospital for Special Surgery 535 East 70th Street New York, NY
10021 rozbruchsr@hss.edu
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
To The Editor:
I read with interest "Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Proximal
Tibial Osteotomy: Risk Factors for Failure"
(2004;86:474-9) by Parvizi et
al. The authors reviewed the results of 166 cemented condylar knee
replacements done in 118 patients who had previously had a proximal tibial
osteotomy. These knee replacements had relatively inferior results, and the
authors identified risk factors for early failure.
The problems cited by the authors were malalignment, patella baja,
instability, periarticular scarring, proximal tibial bone deficiency, and
retained hardware. The great detail about the knee arthroplasty, the long
follow-up, and the meticulous study design are all severely compromised by the
absence of any detail regarding the technique of osteotomy. Were these opening
or closing . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Javad Parvizi, MD,
Arlen D. Hanssen, MD and
Mark J. Spangehl, MD
Corresponding author: Mark J. Spangehl, MD Mayo Clinic 13400 East
Shea Boulevard Scottsdale, AZ 85259

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
Related articles in JBJS:
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Proximal Tibial Osteotomy: Risk Factors for Failure
- Javad Parvizi, Arlen D. Hanssen, and Mark J. Spangehl
JBJS 2004 86: 474-479.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|