This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tamai, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tamai, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 84:800-803 (2002)
© 2002 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Case Report

Heavy Metal Injection Granulomas: A Source of Diagnostic Confusion

A Composite Case Report

Junichi Tamai, MD and James A. Shaw, MD

Investigation performed at The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.

Junichi Tamai, MD
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19034

James A. Shaw, MD
7817 Tomlinson Avenue, Cabin John, MD 20818

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


    Introduction
 
Prior to the introduction of penicillin in the 1940s, syphilis was treated primarily with heavy metal injections. Once commonplace, the characteristic gluteal injection deposits visible on radiographs are now seen only occasionally and, therefore, may result in a diagnostic enigma to younger orthopaedic surgeons. An informal survey of orthopaedic residents and younger faculty members at our institution who were asked to identify the radiopaque deposits seen in Figures 1-A , 1-B , 1-C , and 1-D ) revealed a 0% recognition rate. Since patients with a history of syphilis who were originally treated with heavy metal injections still are seen on occasion by an orthopaedic surgeon, it is important that younger orthopaedists become reacquainted with the characteristic radiographic appearance of these injection granulomas.


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1-A: Figs. 1-A through 1-D Recent radiographs of four patients who were between seventy and eighty years old, demonstrating heavy metal (bismuth) injection granulomas in the gluteal muscles. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?