The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:953-954 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Autologous Blood and Allogeneic Transfusion
Steven T. Woolson, MD,
David Grosvenor, MPH and
Stuart Goodman, MD, PhD
1220 University Drive, Suite 204
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Corresponding author: Stuart Goodman, MD, PhD
Department of Functional Restoration
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery
Stanford University Medical Center
300 Pasteur Drive, Room R-144
Stanford, CA 94305-5341
To The Editor:
As one of the ten surgeons who "participated in the
study" entitled "Efficacy of Postoperative Blood
Salvage Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with and without
Deposited Autologous Units" (82-A: 951-954, July 2000),
by Grosvenor et al., I have several comments regarding this manuscript.
I have serious reservations regarding the validity of the authors results.
The authors used the end point of the transfusion of allogeneic
blood as the determinant of the efficacy of postoperative blood
salvage. However, they studied a consecutive series of patients
who had been treated by ten different surgeons who ordered allogeneic blood
for their individual patients. In the Materials and Methods section
of the manuscript, the authors state: "The decision to
perform a transfusion was made by each surgeon and patient without
a formal protocol." Therefore, the authors statement
in the Abstract that patients who had postoperative salvage "required" allogeneic blood
one-tenth . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|