The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:952-953 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Arthroscopic Repair Versus Open Surgery for Shoulder Instability
Ioannis A. Karnezis, FRCS(Ed), FRCS(Glas),
Partha P. Sarangi, FRCS(Ed), FRCS(Orth),
Brian J. Cole, MD, MBA,
John LInsalata, MD,
Jay Irrgang, PTATC and
Jon J.P. Warner, MD
Corresponding author: Ioannis A.
Karnezis, FRCS(Ed), FRCS(Glas)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Level 3, Bristol Royal Infirmary
Bristol BS2 8HW
United Kingdom
E-mail address: iakarnezis@bristol.ac.uk
Corresponding author: Brian J. Cole, MD, MBA
Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush
1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 1063
Chicago, IL 60612
To The Editor:
We took great interest in the article "Comparison of
Arthroscopic and Open Anterior Shoulder Stabilization. A Two to
Six-Year Follow-up Study" (82-A: 1108-1114, August 2000),
by Cole et al. We agree with the authors about the importance of
comparing the outcomes of arthroscopic repair and open surgery for shoulder
stabilization. However, we would like to comment on some of the
issues that the authors have attempted to address.
The title of this article implies that the authors have compared the
effectiveness of open procedures with that of arthroscopic methods
in the treatment of recurrent shoulder instability. However, it
is clear that patients with isolated Bankart lesions were treated
arthroscopically while patients with evidence of anteroinferior
capsular laxity were treated with an open procedure alone. The study
groups were obviously different and were not randomized; therefore, direct
comparison of the two methods cannot be made without the risk . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|