This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hallab, N.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hallab, N.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 83:428 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Current Concepts Review

Metal Sensitivity in Patients with Orthopaedic Implants

Nadim Hallab, PhD, Katharine Merritt, PhD and Joshua J. Jacobs, MD

Nadim Hallab, PhD Joshua J. Jacobs, MD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center, 1653 West Congress Parkway, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail address for N. Hallab: nhallab@rush.edu
Katharine Merritt, PhD Food and Drug Administration, 12709 Twinbrook Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from the National Institutes of Health. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such ­benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or ­nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or ­associated.


    Introduction
 
All metals in contact with biological systems undergo corrosion. This electrochemical process leads to the formation of metal ions, which may activate the immune system by forming complexes with endogenous proteins.

Implant degradation products have been shown to be associated with dermatitis, urticaria, and vasculitis. If cutaneous signs of an allergic response appear after implantation of a metal device, metal sensitivity should be considered. Currently, there is no generally accepted test for the clinical determination of metal hypersensitivity to implanted devices.

The prevalence of dermal sensitivity in patients with a joint replacement device, particularly those with a failed implant, is substantially higher than that in the general population.

Until the roles of delayed hypersensitivity and humoral immune responses to metallic orthopaedic implants are more clearly defined, the risk to patients may be considered minimal.

It is currently unclear whether metal sensitivity is a contributing factor to implant failure.

Implant-related metal . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
K. B. Reed, M. D. P. Davis, K. Nakamura, L. Hanson, and D. M. Richardson
Retrospective Evaluation of Patch Testing Before or After Metal Device Implantation
Arch Dermatol, August 1, 2008; 144(8): 999 - 1007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
M. Bruze
Thoughts on Implants and Contact Allergy
Arch Dermatol, August 1, 2008; 144(8): 1042 - 1044.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. Antoniou, D. J. Zukor, F. Mwale, W. Minarik, A. Petit, and O. L. Huk
Metal Ion Levels in the Blood of Patients After Hip Resurfacing: A Comparison Between Twenty-eight and Thirty-six-Millimeter-Head Metal-on-Metal Prostheses
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_3): 142 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. J. Jacobs, P. A. Campbell, and Y. T. Konttinen
How has the biologic reaction to wear particles changed with newer bearing surfaces?
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., July 1, 2008; 16(suppl_1): S49 - S55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. Shimmin, P. E. Beaule, and P. Campbell
Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 637 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. G. Bitsch, M. Zamorano, T. Loidolt, C. Heisel, J. J. Jacobs, and T. P. Schmalzried
Ion Production and Excretion in a Patient with a Metal-on-Metal Bearing Hip Prosthesis. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2007; 89(12): 2758 - 2763.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Animal Hospital AssociationHome page
P. Denerolle, S. D. White, T. S. Taylor, and S. I.J. Vandenabeele
Organic Diseases Mimicking Acral Lick Dermatitis in Six Dogs
J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., July 1, 2007; 43(4): 215 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. J. Jacobs and N. J. Hallab
Loosening and Osteolysis Associated with Metal-on-Metal Bearings: A Local Effect of Metal Hypersensitivity?
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2006; 88(6): 1171 - 1172.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
I. Milosev, R. Trebse, S. Kovac, A. Cor, and V. Pisot
Survivorship and Retrieval Analysis of Sikomet Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacements at a Mean of Seven Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2006; 88(6): 1173 - 1182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. Korovessis, G. Petsinis, M. Repanti, and T. Repantis
Metallosis After Contemporary Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty. Five to Nine-Year Follow-up
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2006; 88(6): 1183 - 1191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
A. J. Hart, T. Hester, K. Sinclair, J. J. Powell, A. E. Goodship, L. Pele, N. L. Fersht, and J. Skinner
The association between metal ions from hip resurfacing and reduced T-cell counts
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2006; 88-B(4): 449 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. J. Jacobs, N. J. Hallab, R. M. Urban, and M. A. Wimmer
Wear Particles
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2006; 88(suppl_2): 99 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
M. L. Busam, R. J. Esther, and W. T. Obremskey
Hardware Removal: Indications and Expectations
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., February 1, 2006; 14(2): 113 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Y.-S. Park, Y.-W. Moon, S.-J. Lim, J.-M. Yang, G. Ahn, and Y.-L. Choi
Early Osteolysis Following Second-Generation Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2005; 87(7): 1515 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. Heisel, M. Silva, A. K. Skipor, J. J. Jacobs, and T. P. Schmalzried
The Relationship Between Activity and Ions in Patients with Metal-on-Metal Bearing Hip Prostheses
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2005; 87(4): 781 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
H.-G. Willert, G. H. Buchhorn, A. Fayyazi, R. Flury, M. Windler, G. Koster, and C. H. Lohmann
Metal-on-Metal Bearings and Hypersensitivity in Patients with Artificial Hip Joints. A Clinical and Histomorphological Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2005; 87(1): 28 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. Heisel, M. Silva, and T. P. Schmalzried
Bearing Surface Options for Total Hip Replacement in Young Patients
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 3, 2003; 85(7): 1366 - 1379.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. H. Huo and S. M. Cook
What's New in Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2001; 83(10): 1598 - 1610.
[Full Text] [PDF]