The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:S98-103 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Bone-Graft Substitutes: Facts, Fictions, and Applications
A. Seth Greenwald, DPhil(Oxon),
Scott D. Boden, MD,
Victor M. Goldberg, MD,
Yusuf Khan, MS,
Cato T. Laurencin, MDPhD and
Randy N. Rosier, MD for the Committee on Biological Implants
A. Seth Greenwald, DPhil(Oxon)
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Lutheran Hospital, Cleveland
Clinic Health System, 1730 West 25th Street, Cleveland, OH 44113.
E-mail address: seth@orl-inc.com
Scott D. Boden, MD
Emory Spine Center, 2165 North Decatur Road, Decatur, GA 30033
Victor M. Goldberg, MD
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid
Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106
Yusuf Khan, MS
Cato T. Laurencin, MD, PhD
Center for Advanced Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, 3141
Chestnut Street, Philadelphia PA 19104
Randy N. Rosier, MD
University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 665, Rochester,
NY 14642
Acknowledgments: GenSci OrthoBiologics, Incorporated; Interpore
Cross International; Osteotech, Incorporated; Wright Medical Technology,
Incorporated; and Zimmer, Incorporated.
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support
of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not
receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement
to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial
entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits
to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other
charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated
or associated.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
 |
The Emergence of Bone-Grafting
|
|---|
It is estimated that more than 500,000 bone-grafting procedures
are performed annually in the United States, with approximately
half of these procedures related to spine fusion. These numbers
easily double on a global basis and indicate a shortage in the availability
of musculoskeletal donor tissue traditionally used in these reconstructions
(Fig. 1).
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1: United
States trends in musculoskeletal tissue donors. Source: United Network
for Organ Sharing and the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation.
|
|
This reality has stimulated a proliferation of corporate interest
in supplying what is seen as a growing market in bone-substitute
materials (Fig. 2).
These graft alternatives are subjected to varying degrees of regulatory
scrutiny, and thus their true safety and effectiveness in patients
may not be known prior to their use by orthopaedic surgeons. It is
thus important to gain insight into this emerging class of bone-substitute
alternatives.
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2: United
States sales of bone graft and bone . . . [Full Text of this Article] |
|

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. T. Obremskey, J. S. Marotta, M. J. Yaszemski, L. R. Churchill, S. D. Boden, and D. R. Dirschl
Symposium. The Introduction of Biologics in Orthopaedics: Issues of Cost, Commercialism, and Ethics
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2007;
89(7):
1641 - 1649.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|