The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:S87-91 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Optimizing Acetabular Component Position to Minimize Impingement and Reduce Contact Stress
Darryl D. D'Lima, MD,
Peter C. Chen, PhD and
Clifford W. Colwell, Jr., MD
Darryl D. DLima, MD
Peter C. Chen, PhD
Clifford W. Colwell Jr., MD
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, MS126, 11025
North Torrey Pines Road, Suite 140, La Jolla, CA 92037. E-mail address
for D.D. DLima: ddlima@scripps.edu. E-mail address
for C.W. Colwell Jr.: colwell@scripps.edu
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support
of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not
receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement
to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial
entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits
to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other
charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated
or associated.
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Component impingement due to poor positioning can limit range
of motion after total hip arthroplasty. Contact stresses on ultra-high
molecular weight polyethylene are also dependent on the orientation
of the acetabular component. In this study, a computer kinematic
model was used to determine the effects of component position and
variation of head:neck ratios on prosthetic impingement and hip range
of motion, and a finite element model was employed to calculate
polyethylene stresses at different cup positions.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Kinematic Analysis
A three-dimensional total hip prosthesis with a hemispherical
acetabular cup, femoral neck diameters ranging from 10 to 12 mm,
and head sizes ranging from 22 to 32 mm was generated (Fig. 1). The maximum
range of motion of the hip was measured, before impingement of the
neck on the cup liner, for acetabular component abduction angles
ranging from 35° to 55° and for acetabular component anteversion
angles ranging from 0° to 30°. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|