This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Heckman, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Heckman, J. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:1619-1621 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Editorial

Volume versus Outcomes in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Proper Perspective is Paramount

Charles R. Clark, MD, Deputy Editor for Adult Reconstruction and James D. Heckman, MD, Editor-in-Chief

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Volume versus outcomes. How should the orthopaedic surgeon and the medical community at large react? This issue of The Journal contains an important article by Katz et al. dealing with the association between hospital and surgeon volume and outcomes of total hip surgery in the United States Medicare population1. It appears logical to assume that the more experience that a surgeon has with a particular procedure, the better the result and that a so-called learning curve may be associated with many surgical procedures. One can hardly argue with the goal of improving our care of patients by providing the best possible outcome. This is particularly true of high-volume procedures such as total hip replacements, which are performed at the rate of more than 200,000 per year2. The majority of both primary and revision total hip arthroplasties in patients in the Medicare population are performed by surgeons who carry out . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. Restrepo, J. Parvizi, T. Dietrich, and T. A. Einhorn
Safety of Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Meta-Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2007; 89(6): 1220 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
B Kapoor, D J Clement, A Kirkley, and N Maffulli
Current practice in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the United Kingdom
Br. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2004; 38(5): 542 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]