The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 83:1619-1621 (2001)
© 2001 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Volume versus Outcomes in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Proper Perspective is Paramount
Charles R. Clark, MD, Deputy Editor for Adult Reconstruction and
James D. Heckman, MD, Editor-in-Chief
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Volume versus outcomes. How should the orthopaedic
surgeon and the medical community at large react? This issue of The
Journal contains an important article by Katz et al. dealing
with the association between hospital and surgeon volume and outcomes
of total hip surgery in the United States Medicare population1. It appears logical to assume that
the more experience that a surgeon has with a particular procedure,
the better the result and that a so-called learning curve may be
associated with many surgical procedures. One can hardly argue with
the goal of improving our care of patients by providing the best
possible outcome. This is particularly true of high-volume procedures
such as total hip replacements, which are performed at the rate
of more than 200,000 per year2. The majority of both primary and
revision total hip arthroplasties in patients in the Medicare population
are performed by surgeons who carry out . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Restrepo, J. Parvizi, T. Dietrich, and T. A. Einhorn
Safety of Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Meta-Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
June 1, 2007;
89(6):
1220 - 1226.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B Kapoor, D J Clement, A Kirkley, and N Maffulli
Current practice in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the United Kingdom
Br. J. Sports Med.,
October 1, 2004;
38(5):
542 - 544.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|