The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 81:1652-3 (1999)
© 1999 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Correspondence
Kevin B. Freedman, M.D.,
Laura L. Tosi, M.D. and
Joseph M. Lane, M.D.
TO THE EDITOR:
I read "Editorial. Osteoporosis Prevention and the Orthopaedic Surgeon: When Fracture Care Is Not Enough" (80-A: 15671569, Nov. 1998), by Tosi and Lane, with great interest. These authors are to be commended for their excellent review of the role of the orthopaedic surgeon in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. In their review, the authors cited the recently approved "Standardization of Medicare Coverage of Bone Mass Measurement," which defines five diagnostic categories that meet approval for the use of bone-density technologies: (1) estrogen-deficient women who are at clinical risk for osteoporosis, (2) patients who have vertebral abnormalities, (3) patients who are receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy, (4) patients who have primary hyperparathyroidism, and (5) patients who are being monitored to assess the response to, or the efficacy of, an approved drug for osteoporosis. I am writing to suggest that a sixth category be established: postmenopausal women who have . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|