The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 81:1454-60 (1999)
© 1999 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Current Concepts Review - Sample Size and Statistical Power in Clinical Orthopaedic Research*
KEVIN B. FREEDMAN, M.D., M.S.C.E. and
JOSEPH BERNSTEIN, M.D., M.S. , PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA
Investigation performed at the Sports Medicine Service, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and Veterans' Hospital, Philadelphia
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Classic principles of treatment in orthopaedic surgerythe immobilization of fractures or the draining of infected wounds, for examplewere not first established in prospective clinical trials or laboratory experiments. Rather, they were derived from perceptive observation: the methods were seen to work in practice, and they were retained. Observation has a noble history in medicine and science. Still, the modern reader is at least intuitively aware of the limitations of mere observation. Imagine if an investigator were to claim that prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis after hip replacement is not needed simply because only two thromboses were observed in ten patients who did not receive prophylaxis compared with three thromboses in ten patients who did. Such a study, were it to be published, would be the object of ridicule.
A single clinical observation is actually a sample of the entire set of possible observations, and methods of statistical inference are needed to . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Delucchi
Sample Size Estimation in Research With Dependent Measures and Dichotomous Outcomes
Am J Public Health,
March 1, 2004;
94(3):
372 - 377.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Bernstein
Evidence-Based Medicine Appendix: Ten Rules for Evaluating Evidence
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
March 1, 2004;
12(2):
e1 - e3.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Buckley, S. Tough, R. McCormack, G. Pate, R. Leighton, D. Petrie, and R. Galpin
Operative Compared with Nonoperative Treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures : A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 10, 2002;
84(10):
1733 - 1744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. D. Halpern, J. H. T. Karlawish, and J. A. Berlin
The Continuing Unethical Conduct of Underpowered Clinical Trials
JAMA,
July 17, 2002;
288(3):
358 - 362.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. Marx, E. C. Jones, A. A. Allen, D. W. Altchek, S. J. O'Brien, S. A. Rodeo, R. J. Williams, R. F. Warren, and T. L. Wickiewicz
Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Four Knee Outcome Scales for Athletic Patients
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2001;
83(10):
1459 - 1469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. T. Mehlman, W. M. Strub, D. R. Roy, E. J. Wall, and A. H. Crawford
The Effect of Surgical Timing on the Perioperative Complications of Treatment of Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2001;
83(3):
323 - 323.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Matsusaka, S. Yokoyama, T. Tsurusaki, S. Inokuchi, and M. Okita
Effect of Ankle Disk Training Combined with Tactile Stimulation to the Leg and Foot on Functional Instability of the Ankle
Am. J. Sports Med.,
January 1, 2001;
29(1):
25 - 30.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|