This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Günal, I.
Right arrow Articles by Patzer, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Günal, I.
Right arrow Articles by Patzer, G. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 80:1553 (1998)
© 1998 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Correspondence

Correspondence

Izge Günal, M.D., Harold B. Kitaoka, M.D. and Gary L. Patzer, R.N.

TO THE EDITOR:

In "Arthrodesis for the Treatment of Arthrosis of the Ankle and Osteonecrosis of the Talus" (80-A: 370–379, March 1998), Kitaoka and Patzer reported that they performed arthrodesis of the ankle for the patients in Group I, who had arthrosis of the ankle but not of the subtalar joint. Their rationale for this type of treatment was the fair results following talectomy as reported in the literature.

According to . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?