This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sugano, N.
Right arrow Articles by Krackow, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sugano, N.
Right arrow Articles by Krackow, K. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 79:1589-90 (1997)
© 1997 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Correspondence

Correspondence

Nobuhiko Sugano, M.D., Ph.D., Michael A. Mont, M.D., David S. Hungerford, M.D., Adrian C. Fairbank, F.R.C.S. and Kenneth A. Krackow, M.D.

TO THE EDITOR:

I question the effectiveness of the osteotomy used and the conclusions drawn in "Corrective Osteotomy for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head. The Results of a Long-Term Follow-up Study" (78-A: 1032–1038, July 1996), by Mont et al.

It has been well recognized that the location and size of a necrotic lesion are related to the prognosis. The authors stated that the criteria for the operation included an arc of at least 20 degrees on the lateral aspect of the femoral head that was free of any underlying necrotic bone. This means that most of the necrotic lesions included in the study occupied less than the medial two-thirds of the weight-bearing portion (type-I-A or I-B osteonecrosis according to the radiographic classification of the Japanese Investigation Committee8,11 or type-A or B according to the magnetic resonance imaging classification10 or the classification of the Association Research Circulation Osseous3). Such a . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?