This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'REILLY, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by O'REILLY, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1918;s2-16:433-443.
© 1918 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc


SOME NOTES ON THE DRAFT EXAMINATION

ARCHER O'REILLY M.D., F.A.C.S.

In 846 registrants examined there were strikingly few orthopedic lesions and deformities seen. Of these, the greatest number were static foot conditions—28% of all registrants examined. All these but two or three could be cured by adequate treatment.

From an orthopedic point of view, the examination of the feet is most important.

There is a great lack of unanimity in examining and recording foot conditions, and a tendency to laxness. The examination could be made more efficient if it were standardized.

There should be at least a consulting orthopedic surgeon attached to each Medical Examining Board, so that by their more careful examination of a comparatively few men, the work at the camps could be lessened, and the possibility of putting men with potentially bad feet into active service could be decreased, thereby saving the Government and the registrant loss of time and money.

By putting registrants in Group B, for the treatment of remediable lesions and deformities, many men may be secured for active service who previously would have been disqualified.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?