The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2009;91:2287-2295.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01762
© 2009 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Insel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mazzocca, A. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Insel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mazzocca, A. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Topics in Training
Right arrow Adult Knee
Right arrow Shoulder
Right arrow Education and Training
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Development of an Objective Model to Assess Arthroscopic Performance

Aaron Insel, MD1, Bradley Carofino, MD1, Robin Leger, RN, PhD1, Robert Arciero, MD1 and Augustus D. Mazzocca, MS, MD1

1 University of Connecticut Health Center, Medical Arts and Research Building, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06034-4037. E-mail address for A. Mazzocca: mazzocca{at}uchc.edu

Disclosure: In support of their research for or preparation of this work, one or more of the authors received, in any one year, outside funding or grants of less than $10,000 from the University of Connecticut Medical Student Summer Research Program and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Connecticut. One or more of the authors, or a member of his or her immediate family, received, in any one year, payments or other benefits of more than $10,000 or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida). No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.


Background: Many residency and fellowship programs have cadaver laboratories to teach and practice arthroscopic skills. However, there is currently no validated method of evaluating arthroscopic skill in this setting. The purpose of the present study was to develop and validate an objective model for evaluating basic arthroscopic proficiency on a cadaver knee in a bioskills laboratory.

Methods: Two measures from the educational literature were adapted for use specifically for arthroscopy: a task-specific checklist and a global rating scale were combined to create the Basic Arthroscopic Knee Skill Scoring System. Fifty-nine residents, three sports medicine fellows, and six sports medicine fellowship-trained attending surgeons were recruited. After completing a demographic survey, including the postgraduate year and number of knee and shoulder arthroscopies performed, each subject performed a diagnostic knee arthroscopy and a partial meniscectomy on a cadaver knee while being assessed by a single evaluator using the Basic Arthroscopic Knee Skill Scoring System.

Results: There was a strong positive correlation between global rating scale scores and both the postgraduate year (r = 0.93, p < 0.01) and the ranked number of knee arthroscopies performed (r = 0.88, p < 0.01). These scores detected significant differences between postgraduate years 1 and 2, and years 4 and 5 at the p ≤ 0.01 level and between years 2 and 3 at the p ≤ 0.05 level. Task-specific checklist scores were moderately correlated with both postgraduate year (r = 0.73, p < 0.01) and ranked number of knee arthroscopies performed (r = 0.64, p < 0.01). These scores detected significant differences only between postgraduate year-1 and year-2 residents at the p ≤ 0.01 level, indicating that these skills are acquired early in training.

Conclusion: The Basic Arthroscopic Knee Skill Scoring System can capture and differentiate levels of arthroscopic skill and was validated to objectively evaluate basic arthroscopic proficiency in a bioskills laboratory. This model will allow benchmarks of surgical skill to be created for each level of residency training and individual progress to be monitored over time.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?