The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2009;91:2144-2150.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00744
© 2009 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activities for this article:
 Shoulder/Elbow Test 28: Fall 2009 (publication date November 16, 2009; expi...
CME 3: July, August, September 2009 (publication date October 5, 2009; expi...
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jia, X.
Right arrow Articles by McFarland, E. G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jia, X.
Right arrow Articles by McFarland, E. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Shoulder
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Analysis of Shoulder Laxity in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Surgery

Xiaofeng Jia, MD, PhD1, Jong Hun Ji, MD1, Steve A. Petersen, MD1, Michael T. Freehill, MD1 and Edward G. McFarland, MD1

1 c/o Elaine P. Henze, BJ, ELS, Medical Editor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 4940 Eastern Avenue, #A665, Baltimore, MD 21224-2780. E-mail address for E.P. Henze: ehenze1{at}jhmi.edu

Investigation performed at the Division of Shoulder Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University/Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland

Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.

Background: It has been recognized that there is a distinction between shoulder laxity and shoulder instability and that there is a wide range of normal shoulder laxities. Our goals were (1) to evaluate if the ability to subluxate the shoulder over the glenoid rim in patients under anesthesia would be more prevalent than the inability to do so, (2) to determine if patients with a diagnosis of instability would have significantly more shoulder laxity in the operatively treated shoulder than in the contralateral shoulder, and (3) to evaluate the observation that higher grades of shoulder laxity would be related to a diagnosis of shoulder instability. We hypothesized that, on examination with the patient under anesthesia, most shoulders could be subluxated over the glenoid rim and that the degree of shoulder laxity would be related to diagnosis.

Methods: In the present study of 1206 patients undergoing shoulder surgery, we evaluated the symptomatic and contralateral shoulders with use of a modified anterior and posterior drawer test and a sulcus sign test, with the patients under anesthesia. The anterior and posterior translations were graded as no subluxation (Grade I), subluxation over the glenoid rim with spontaneous reduction (Grade II), or subluxation without spontaneous reduction (Grade III). The sulcus sign was graded as <1.0 cm (Grade I), 1.0 to 2.0 cm (Grade II), or >2.0 cm (Grade III).

Results: When the patients were evaluated while under anesthesia, the humeral head could be subluxated over the rim anteriorly in 81.6% (984 of 1206) of the patients and posteriorly in 57.5% (693 of 1206) of the patients. When the patients were evaluated while under anesthesia, there was an increase in the laxity grade anteriorly, posteriorly, and inferiorly in 50.8%, 36.3%, and 15.8% of the patients, respectively, as compared with the preoperative assessment. For all laxity testing, the higher the grade of laxity in an anterior, posterior, or inferior direction, the greater the chance that the patient had a diagnosis of instability. Compared with Grade-I laxity, Grade-III laxity increased the odds of a diagnosis of instability in the anterior (odds ratio, 170), posterior (odds ratio, 32), and inferior (odds ratio, 10.3) directions. Compared with Grade-I laxity, Grade-II laxity increased the odds of a diagnosis of instability in the anterior (odds ratio, 9.8), posterior (odds ratio, 4.6), and inferior (odds ratio, 4.4) directions.

Conclusions: The ability to subluxate the humeral head over the glenoid rim in the patient who is undergoing shoulder surgery under anesthesia is common regardless of the diagnosis. Higher grades of shoulder laxity are associated with shoulder instability.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
X. Jia, S. A. Petersen, A. H. Khosravi, V. Almareddi, V. Pannirselvam, and E. G. McFarland
Examination of the Shoulder: The Past, the Present, and the Future
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2009; 91(Supplement_6): 10 - 18.
[Full Text] [PDF]