The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2009;91:892-899.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.01075
© 2009 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Prediction of Midfoot Instability in the Subtle Lisfranc InjuryComparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Intraoperative Findings
Steven M. Raikin, MD1,
Ilan Elias, MD1,
Sachin Dheer, MD2,
Marcus P. Besser, PhD3,
William B. Morrison, MD2 and
Adam C. Zoga, MD2
1 Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 925 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. E-mail address for S.M. Raikin: Steven.raikin{at}rothmaninstitute.com
2 Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107
3 Human Performance and Gait Laboratory, Thomas Jefferson University, 130 South 9th Street, Suite 830, Philadelphia, PA 19107
Investigation performed at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.
Background: The objective of the present study was to assess the utility of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of an injury to the Lisfranc and adjacent ligaments and to determine whether conventional magnetic resonance imaging is a reliable diagnostic tool, with manual stress radiographic evaluation with the patient under anesthesia and surgical findings being used as a reference standard.
Methods: Magnetic resonance images of twenty-one feet in twenty patients (ten women and ten men with a mean age of 33.6 years [range, twenty to fifty-six years]) were evaluated with regard to the integrity of the dorsal and plantar bundles of the Lisfranc ligament, the plantar tarsal-metatarsal ligaments, and the medial-middle cuneiform ligament. Furthermore, the presence of fluid along the first metatarsal base and the presence of fractures also were evaluated. Radiographic observations were compared with intraoperative findings with respect to the stability of the Lisfranc joint, and logistic regression was used to find the best predictors of Lisfranc joint instability.
Results: Intraoperatively, seventeen unstable and four stable Lisfranc joints were identified. The strongest predictor of instability was disruption of the plantar ligament between the first cuneiform and the bases of the second and third metatarsals (the pC1-M2M3 ligament), with a sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of 94%, 75%, and 94%, respectively. Nineteen (90%) of the twenty-one Lisfranc joint complexes were correctly classified on magnetic resonance imaging; in one case an intraoperatively stable Lisfranc joint complex was interpreted as unstable on magnetic resonance imaging, and in another case an intraoperatively unstable Lisfranc joint complex was interpreted as stable on magnetic resonance imaging. The majority (eighteen) of the twenty-one feet demonstrated disruption of the second plantar tarsal-metatarsal ligament, which had little clinical correlation with instability.
Conclusions: Magnetic resonance imaging is accurate for detecting traumatic injury of the Lisfranc ligament and for predicting Lisfranc joint complex instability when the plantar Lisfranc ligament bundle is used as a predictor. Rupture or grade-2 sprain of the plantar ligament between the first cuneiform and the bases of the second and third metatarsals is highly suggestive of an unstable midfoot, for which surgical stabilization has been recommended. The appearance of a normal ligament is suggestive of a stable midfoot, and documentation of its integrity may obviate the need for a manual stress radiographic evaluation under anesthesia for a patient with equivocal clinical and radiographic examinations.
Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Marx and M. S. Mizel
What's New in Foot and Ankle Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2010;
92(2):
512 - 523.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Prediction of Midfoot Instability in Subtle Lisfranc Injury
- Ben J. Summerhays, DPM, et al.
- JBJS Online, 28 May 2009
[Full text]
- Dr. Raikin and colleagues respond to Dr. Summerhays and colleagues
- Steven M. Raikin, MD, et al.
- JBJS Online, 28 May 2009
[Full text]
|