The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2009;91:429-434.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01261
© 2009 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Good, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Good, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, R. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effect of Radiofrequency Energy on Glenohumeral Fluid Temperature During Shoulder Arthroscopy

Christopher R. Good, MD1, Michael K. Shindle, MD2, Matthew H. Griffith, MD2, Tony Wanich, MD2 and Russell F. Warren, MD2

1 Virginia Spine Institute, 1831 Wiehle Avenue, Reston, VA 20190
2 The Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address for M.K. Shindle: shindlem{at}hss.edu

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service, The Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.

Background: Reports of glenohumeral chondrolysis following arthroscopy have raised concern about the deleterious effects that thermal devices may have on articular cartilage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of flow and duration of treatment with a thermal device on temperatures within cadaveric glenohumeral joint specimens. It was hypothesized that the use of a thermal device during surgery increases the temperature of fluid within the joint to >45°C, which has been shown to cause chondrocyte death.

Methods: Temperature was measured at four locations within ten cadaver shoulder joints. Eight heating trials were performed on each cadaver shoulder to test three variables: the method of heating (continuous or intermittent), the fluid-pump flow rate (no flow, 50% flow, or 100% flow), and the location of the radiofrequency probe (the radiofrequency energy was either applied directly to anterior capsular tissue in a paintbrush pattern or held adjacent to the glenoid without tissue contact).

Results: Temperatures of >45°C occurred in every trial. The average maximum temperatures in all no-flow conditions were significantly higher than those in the trials with flow. Higher temperatures were measured by the anterior probe in all trials. When the heating had been applied adjacent to the glenoid, without tissue contact, the time needed to cool to a safe temperature was significantly longer in the no-flow states (average, 140.5 seconds) than it was in the 50% flow states (average, 12.5 seconds) or the 100% flow states (average, 8.5 seconds).

Conclusions: Use of a thermal probe during arthroscopy may cause joint fluid temperatures to reach levels high enough to cause chondrocyte death. Maintaining adequate fluid-pump flow rates may help to lower joint fluid temperatures and protect articular cartilage.

Clinical Relevance: The use of radiofrequency devices according to the manufacturer's recommendations in situations similar to clinical scenarios can result in exposure of chondrocytes to temperatures high enough to cause their death (>45°C). While this complication is rare, this study emphasizes that care must be taken when using these devices; precautions include minimization of direct chondrocyte exposure and maintenance of adequate flow rates.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. D. Nelson, M. V. Hogan, and M. D. Miller
What's New in Sports Medicine
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2010; 92(1): 250 - 263.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
B. B. Zoric, N. Horn, S. Braun, and P. J. Millett
Factors Influencing Intra-Articular Fluid Temperature Profiles with Radiofrequency Ablation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2009; 91(10): 2448 - 2454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]