The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2009;91:2461-2468.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.I.00015
© 2009 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sabharwal, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sabharwal, S.
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pediatrics
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle in Children: Reference Values Based on a Full-Length Standing Radiograph

Sanjeev Sabharwal, MD1 and Caixia Zhao, MD1

1 Department of Orthopedics, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, 90 Bergen Street, Doctor's Office Center, Suite 7300, Newark, NJ 07103. E-mail address for S. Sabharwal: sabharsa{at}umdnj.edu

Investigation performed at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey

Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity.

Background: It is well recognized that the alignment of the lower limb changes during early childhood. The hip-knee-ankle angle is often referred to as the mechanical femoral-tibial angle and is measured on a full-length radiograph of the lower extremity. While several authors have independently reported consistent reference values for the hip-knee-ankle angle in adults, such values have not been well documented for children. The purpose of our study was to establish reference values for the hip-knee-ankle angle and assess the relationship between it and the anatomic femoral-tibial angle in children.

Methods: A database at a single institution was searched for patients who were between one and less than eighteen years old at the time that a standing full-length radiograph of the lower extremities was made. Radiographs of the uninvolved extremity (the limb without any radiographic abnormalities or documented clinical concerns) were analyzed. The angle between a line connecting the center of the ossified femoral head and the center of the distal femoral epiphysis and another line connecting the center of the distal femoral epiphysis and the center of the talar dome was measured. Simple regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between this angle and the anatomic femoral-tibial angle.

Results: A total of 354 unaffected lower extremities of 253 children were analyzed. The mean hip-knee-ankle angle was +3.6° (varus) in children between one and two years old and –2.5° (valgus) in those between two and three years old. After the age of seven years, the mean value was +0.3° (varus), which was within 1° of the reference values available for the adult population (mean, +1.2° [varus]). There was a linear relationship between the hip-knee-ankle and anatomic femoral-tibial angles in the children (r = 0.87, p < 0.0001). Despite varying hip-knee-ankle angles at different ages, the mean absolute difference between that angle and the anatomic femoral-tibial angle remained relatively constant (mean, 6.7°) and was not associated with changing age (r = –0.09).

Conclusions: In our study sample, reference values for the hip-knee-ankle angle in children older than seven years of age approached those reported for adults in North America. Although this angle and the anatomic femoral-tibial angle in children younger than seven were distinct from those reported for the adult population, the difference between the two angular measurements remained essentially unaffected. The use of age-specific reference values for both the hip-knee-ankle and the anatomic femoral-tibial angle is recommended for children younger than seven years old.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?