The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2008;90:47-62.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01135
© 2008 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahara, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ogino, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Takahara, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ogino, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Classification, Treatment, and Outcome of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Humeral Capitellum

Surgical Technique

Masatoshi Takahara, MD, PhD1, Nariyuki Mura, MD, PhD1, Junya Sasaki, MD1, Mikio Harada, MD, PhD1 and Toshihiko Ogino, MD, PhD1

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Iida-Nish 2-2-2, Yamagata City, 990-9585, Japan. E-mail address for M. Takahara: mtakahar{at}med.id.yamagata-u.ac.jp

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata City, Japan

The original scientific article in which the surgical technique was presented was published in JBJS Vol. 89-A, pp. 1205-14, June 2007

DISCLOSURE: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.

The line drawings in this article are the work of Joanne Haderer Müller of Haderer & Müller (biomedart{at}haderermuller.com).

BACKGROUND: Indications for the treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum have remained unclear. The aims of this study were to analyze the outcomes and to determine the most useful classification for the choice of treatment.

METHODS: The cases of 106 patients with osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum were studied retrospectively. At the time of the initial presentation, the mean age of the patients was 15.3 years. The capitellar growth plate was open in eighteen patients and closed in eighty-eight. Thirty-six patients were treated nonoperatively. Fifty-five patients underwent fragment removal alone, twelve underwent fragment fixation with a bone graft, and three underwent reconstruction of the articular surface with use of osteochondral plug grafts from the lateral femoral condyle. The mean follow-up period was 7.2 years. The outcomes in terms of pain in the elbow, return to sports, and radiographic findings were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS: An osteochondritis dissecans lesion with an open capitellar physis and a good range of elbow motion resulted in a good outcome. Continued elbow stress resulted in the worst outcome in terms of pain and radiographic findings. In patients with a closed capitellar physis, surgery provided significantly better results than elbow rest (p < 0.01). Fragment fixation or reconstruction provided significantly better results than fragment removal alone (p < 0.05). The results of removal alone were dependent on the size of the defect in the capitellum. The outcome in terms of pain was closely associated with sports activity and radiographic findings.

CONCLUSIONS: We believe that osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum can be classified as stable or unstable. Stable lesions that healed completely with elbow rest had all of the following findings at the time of the initial presentation: an open capitellar growth plate, localized flattening or radiolucency of the subchondral bone, and good elbow motion. Unstable lesions, for which surgery provided significantly better results, had one of the following findings: a capitellum with a closed growth plate, fragmentation, or restriction of elbow motion of ≥20°. For large unstable lesions, fragment fixation or reconstruction of the articular surface leads to better results than simple excision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

ORIGINAL ABSTRACT CITATION: "Classification, Treatment, and Outcome of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Humeral Capitellum" (2007;89:1205-14).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?