The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2008;90:765-771.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00293
© 2008 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activity for this article:
CME 2: April, May, June 2008 (publication date July 3, 2008; expiration dat...
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Catani, F.
Right arrow Articles by Giannini, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Catani, F.
Right arrow Articles by Giannini, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Knee
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Alignment Deviation Between Bone Resection and Final Implant Positioning in Computer-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty

Fabio Catani, MD1, Nicola Biasca, MD2, Andrea Ensini, MD1, Alberto Leardini, PhD1, Luca Bianchi, MD1, Vitantonio Digennaro, MD1 and Sandro Giannini, MD1

1 Movement Analysis Laboratory (F.C., A.E., A.L., and S.G.) and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (F.C., A.E., L.B., V.D., and S.G.), Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy. E-mail address for A. Ensini: andrea.ensini{at}ior.it
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spital Oberengandin, CH 7503 Samedan, Switzerland

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Movement Analysis Laboratory, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spital Oberengandin, Samedan, Switzerland

Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.


Background: Computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty is aimed at improving accuracy in the positioning of prosthetic components and realigning the lower limb. The optimal position and orientation of the bone resection planes are targeted by the navigation system, but, after these are obtained, additional manual surgical actions, which may considerably affect final component alignment, are necessary for implantation. The aim of this study was to measure the alignment deviation caused by standard impaction of the tibial and femoral components following bone resections with use of navigation control.

Methods: Ninety-one primary total knee arthroplasties were performed with an image-free knee navigation system. The alignment of the tibial and femoral bone resections was measured in three planes during surgery by the instrumented probe of the system. The alignment measure was repeated after final tibial and femoral component implantation with cement. The alignment deviations between the two measures were considered the positioning error associated with the final manual implantation of the components.

Results: The alignment deviations between the bone resections and the subsequent implant placement were >1° in the frontal plane of the femur and in the frontal and sagittal planes of the tibia in 20%, 11%, and 33% of the patients, respectively. The deviations were >2° in 4%, 3%, and 9% of the patients, respectively. Deviations as large as 3° were found at the tibia in the sagittal plane (the posterior slope).

Conclusions: Positioning of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty, which mainly involves cementation and impaction of the final components, can introduce a considerable error in alignment, regardless of how accurately the resection planes are made. After computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty, it would be useful therefore to check the alignment of the prosthetic component carefully before the cement hardens.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. D. Pearle, D. Kendoff, and V. Musahl
Perspectives on Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery: Movement Toward Quantitative Orthopaedic Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2009; 91(Supplement_1): 7 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. Holt, T. Nunn, and A. Gregori
Ethical Dilemmas in Orthopaedic Surgical Training
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2008; 90(12): 2798 - 2803.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Acknowledgement of prior publication
Jerzy M Sikorski
JBJS Online, 27 Aug 2008 [Full text]
Dr. Ensini and colleagues respond to Dr. Sikorski
ANDREA ENSINI, et al.
JBJS Online, 15 Sep 2008 [Full text]