The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2008;90:233-240.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.01351
© 2008 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Displacement/Screw Cutout After Open Reduction and Locked Plate Fixation of Humeral Fractures
Kevin C. Owsley, MD1 and
John T. Gorczyca, MD1
1 University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 665, Rochester, NY 14642. E-mail address for J.T. Gorczyca: john_gorczyca{at}urmc.rochester.edu
Investigation performed at the University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. One or more of the authors, or a member of his or her immediate family, received, in any one year, payments or other benefits of less than $10,000 or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (Zimmer). No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center, clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or associated.
A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).
Background: Fixation of proximal humeral fractures is challenging. Locking plate technology offers mechanical advantages for treating unstable fractures in weak bone. In this study, we assessed the radiographic and clinical results of a single surgeon's experience treating proximal humeral fractures with a locked proximal humeral plate.
Methods: Fifty-three adult patients with a displaced proximal humeral fracture were treated with a proximal humeral locking plate over a forty-five-month period. A standard postoperative rehabilitation regimen was followed. Radiographs were made at two weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, and one year and were examined for fracture alignment, fracture displacement, hardware position, and healing. Postoperative outcomes were collected with questionnaires.
Results: Fifty-two (98%) of the fifty-three fractures healed by six months. Nineteen patients (36%) had radiographic signs of a complication, including screw cutout with intra-articular displacement in twelve (23%), substantial (>10°) varus displacement in thirteen (25%), and osteonecrosis in two (4%). These radiographic signs of a complication occurred in twelve (57%) of twenty-one patients older than sixty years of age and in seven (22%) of thirty-two patients under sixty years of age (p = 0.0015). Screw cutout occurred in nine (43%) of the twenty-one patients older than sixty years. Patients with a complication had worse functional outcomes as measured with the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (p < 0.05) and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (p < 0.001) questionnaires. We were unable to demonstrate a relationship between fracture type and complications. Revision surgery was performed in seven (13%) of the fifty-three patients. There were no cases of infection, nerve injury, or hardware failure.
Conclusions: The use of locking plates in the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures is associated with an unexpectedly high rate of screw cutout and revision surgery, especially in patients older than sixty years who have a three or four-part fracture. The indications for open reduction and internal fixation in these patients require continued analysis.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Gardner, J. M. Evans, and R. P. Dunbar
Failure of Fracture Plate Fixation
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
October 1, 2009;
17(10):
647 - 657.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Anglen, R. F. Kyle, J. L. Marsh, W. W. Virkus, W. C. Watters III, M. W. Keith, C. M. Turkelson, J. L. Wies, and K. M. Boyer
Locking Plates for Extremity Fractures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
July 1, 2009;
17(7):
465 - 472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. D. Solberg, C. N. Moon, D. P. Franco, and G. D. Paiement
Surgical Treatment of Three and Four-Part Proximal Humeral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2009;
91(7):
1689 - 1697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Ramsey, C. L. Getz, and B. O. Parsons
What's New in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2009;
91(5):
1283 - 1293.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Cole, T. Miclau III, T. V. Ly, J. A. Switzer, M. Li, R. A. Morgan, and M. Bhandari
What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2008;
90(12):
2804 - 2822.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. L. Badman and M. Mighell
Fixed-angle Locked Plating of Two-, Three-, and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
May 1, 2008;
16(5):
294 - 302.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Some Technical Points Regarding Use of Locked Plate Fixation of Humeral Fractures
- Brian L. Badman, M.D., et al.
- JBJS Online, 17 Mar 2008
[Full text]
- Re: Some Technical Points Regarding Use of Locked Plate Fixation of Humeral Fractures
- John T. Gorczyca, M.D., et al.
- JBJS Online, 10 Apr 2008
[Full text]
- More technical tips for locking compression plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures
- Werner Kolb, M.D., et al.
- JBJS Online, 29 Apr 2008
[Full text]
- Dr. Gorczyca, et al. respond to Dr. Kolb, et al.
- John T Gorczyca, M.D., et al.
- JBJS Online, 10 Jun 2008
[Full text]
|