The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:2084-2088.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00567
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Follow-up on Misrepresentation of Research Activity by Orthopaedic Residency Applicants: Has Anything Changed?
Emmanuel K. Konstantakos, MD1,
Richard T. Laughlin, MD1,
Ronald J. Markert, PhD1 and
Lynn A. Crosby, MD1
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Wright State University
Boonshoft School of Medicine, 30 East Apple Street, Suite 2200, Dayton, OH
45409. E-mail address for L.A. Crosby:
lynn.crosby{at}wright.edu
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio
Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or
grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither
they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other
benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center,
clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which
the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or
associated.
Background: In our previous study, published in 1999, we showed that
18% of research citations listed as published by orthopaedic residency
applicants were misrepresented. Since our last report, we sought to determine
whether there had been any change in the behavior of applicants wishing to
pursue the field of orthopaedic surgery.
Methods: We evaluated the research citations that were identified
after a review of the Publications section of the Common Application Form from
the Electronic Residency Application Service for all applicants to our
orthopaedic residency program for 2005 and 2006. Inclusion and exclusion
criteria were established for citations listed on candidate applications.
Citations were required to be from journals listed in Ulrich's Periodicals
Directory. The PubMed-MEDLINE database engine was used to search for
citations. If searching failed to yield the cited publication, a review of the
journal of alleged publication was undertaken and an interlibrary search was
conducted with the use of several research databases. When no match was found,
the citation was labeled as misrepresented. Misrepresentation was defined as
either (1) nonauthorship of an existing article or (2) claimed authorship of a
nonexistent article.
Results: One hundred and forty-two (35.9%) of 396 applicants during
the 2005 and 2006 application periods listed publications. A total of 304
citations were claimed from these 142 applicants. Listings included articles
that were in press or in print (thirty-four citations), articles in journals
not found in Ulrich's Periodicals Directory (twenty-eight citations),
book chapters (twenty-three citations), and articles recorded as having been
submitted (eighty-eight citations). These 173 works were excluded from our
analysis. One hundred and thirty-one citations were referenced as appearing in
journals per our search criteria, and all were verified. Twenty-seven or 20.6%
(95% confidence interval, 14.2% to 28.7%) of 131 citations were
misrepresented.
Conclusions: The prevalence of misrepresented research publications
from orthopaedic surgery residency applicants increased modestly to 20.6%
compared with that found in our original report (18%). As we recommended in
our last report, we strongly urge residency programs to require applicants to
submit reprints of their publications with their residency applications.
Perhaps standardized guidelines should be developed to help to prevent
misrepresentation through the Electronic Residency Application Service.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|