The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:1794-1801.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00603
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Patient Survival After Surgery for Osseous Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma*
Patrick P. Lin, MD1,
Attiqa N. Mirza, MD1,
Valerae O. Lewis, MD1,
Christopher P. Cannon, MD1,
Shi-Ming Tu, MD2,
Nizar M. Tannir, MD2 and
Alan W. Yasko, MD, MBA3
1 Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson
Cancer Center, Unit 408, P.O. Box 301402, Houston, TX 77230. E-mail address
for P.P. Lin:
plin{at}mdanderson.org
2 Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1374, P.O. Box 301439, Houston, TX 77230
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of
Medicine, 645 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 910, Chicago, IL 60611
Investigation performed at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, Texas
Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or
grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither
they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other
benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center,
clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which
the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or
associated.
* Read at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons,
Chicago, Illinois, March 22-26, 2006.
Background: Skeletal metastases from renal cell carcinoma are highly
destructive vascular lesions. They pose unique surgical challenges due to the
risk of life-threatening hemorrhage and resistance to other treatments. The
goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate factors that may affect
survival after surgical treatment of metastases of renal cell carcinoma.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a series of 295
consecutive patients who had been treated for metastatic renal cell carcinoma
at one institution between 1974 and 2004. There were 226 men and sixty-nine
women. A total of 368 metastases of renal cell tumors to the extremities and
pelvis were treated. The surgical procedures included curettage with cementing
and/or internal fixation (214 tumors), en bloc resection (117), closed nailing
(twenty-seven), amputation (four), and other measures (six). Overall survival
was calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. The log-rank test was used to
evaluate the effect of different variables on overall survival.
Results: The overall patient survival rates at one and five years
were 47% and 11%, respectively. The metastatic pattern had a significant
effect on the survival rate (p < 0.0001): patients with a solitary bone
metastasis had the most favorable overall survival rate. Patients with
multiple bone-only metastases had a better survival rate than patients with
pulmonary metastases (p = 0.009). A clear-cell histological subtype was also
associated with better survival (p < 0.0001). The tumor grade did not
predict survival (p = 0.17). Fifteen patients (5%) died within four weeks
after surgery. The causes included acute pulmonary failure (seven patients),
multiorgan failure (six), cerebrovascular accident (one), and hypercalcemia
(one). There were no deaths attributable to intraoperative hemorrhage.
Discussion: Survival beyond twelve months is possible for a
substantial proportion of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Patients with a clear-cell histological subtype, bone-only metastases, and a
solitary metastasis have superior survival rates. The presence of pulmonary
metastases does not predict early death in a reliable manner, and some
patients may survive for years with pulmonary and systemic disease. The data
are important for surgeons to consider when choosing treatment for these
patients. For example, local control of disease and implant stability are
important issues for patients with a potential for a long duration of
survival.
Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|