The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2007;89:1454-1466.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.01214
© 2007 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Complex Posterior Fracture-Dislocation of the ShoulderEpidemiology, Injury Patterns, and Results of Operative Treatment
C. Michael Robinson, BMedSci, FRCSEd(Orth)1,
Adeel Akhtar, MRCSEd1,
Martin Mitchell, MRCSEd1 and
Cole Beavis, MD1
1 The New Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4SU,
United Kingdom. E-mail address for C.M. Robinson:
c.mike.robinson{at}ed.ac.uk
Investigation performed at The Shoulder Injury Clinic, Edinburgh
Orthopaedic Trauma Unit, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Disclosure: The authors did not receive any outside funding or
grants in support of their research for or preparation of this work. Neither
they nor a member of their immediate families received payments or other
benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, division, center,
clinical practice, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which
the authors, or a member of their immediate families, are affiliated or
associated.
Background: Complex posterior fracture-dislocations of the shoulder
are rare and often associated with poor long-term function regardless of the
choice of treatment. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the
epidemiology and pathological anatomy of posterior fracture-dislocations of
the shoulder and to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a
specific treatment protocol of open reduction and internal fixation.
Methods: We studied the demographic details of a consecutive series
of twenty-six patients (twenty-eight shoulders in nineteen men and seven women
with a mean age of fifty-three years) who sustained acute posterior
dislocation of the humeral head with an associated Neer two, three, or
four-part fracture. We used age and gender-specific local census data to
assess the incidence of injury in our local population. All patients were
treated by open relocation of the humeral head, bone-grafting of humeral head
defects if they were causing residual shoulder instability, and internal
fixation of the fracture. We recorded the prevalence of fracture complications
that were clinically and radiographically apparent and assessed the functional
outcome using three validated scoring systems (the Short Form-36 general
health measure, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and the
Constant score).
Results: The overall incidence of posterior fracture-dislocations
was 0.6 per 100,000 population per year. The peak incidence was in middle-aged
men, and most injuries were sustained during a seizure or a fall from a
height. In all patients, there was a displaced primary fracture of the
anatomic neck of the humerus, propagating from the area of an osteochondral
fracture of the anterior aspect of the humeral head (a reverse Hill-Sachs
lesion). We recognized three subtypes determined by the extent of the
secondary fracture lines. At two years after surgery, the median Constant
score was 83.5 points and the median Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and
Hand score was 17.5 points. The eight components of the Short Form-36 score
were not significantly different from those of age and sex-matched controls at
two years.
Conclusions: Acute complex posterior fracture-dislocations of the
shoulder are rare, but they occur in patients who are younger than the
majority of other patients who sustain a proximal humeral fracture. The use of
open reduction and internal fixation to treat these fractures is associated
with a relatively low risk of postoperative complications, and the functional
outcome is generally favorable.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|